Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Israel is at war. We need to shut up.

I just heard on the radio that President Olmert, of the sovereign nation of Israel, had to reassure President Bush that Israel is taking "all appropriate steps" to reduce civilian deaths.

Last I looked, we were doing the SAME FREAKING THING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN!

I don't remember hearing President Bush answering to President Olmert.

HAMAS hides like cowards among the civilians. If the civilians don't want to be collateral damage, then THEY NEED TO STOP SUPPORTING HAMAS AND SHOOT THEM THE NEXT TIME THE TERRORISTS PUT A ROCKET LAUNCHER NEXT TO A SCHOOL!!!!!

It is a tragedy that Palestinians civilians are dying. But by THEIR OWN LOGIC, which describes ALL Israelis as combatants, they put themselves in harm's way. They ELECTED HAMAS. HAMAS targets civilians. Where is the outrage? Why is there no international pressure on HAMAS? 8 FREAKING YEARS OF MISSILES AND ROCKETS!
If Mexico had fired rockets into the US for 8 years, we would have probably done much worse than Israel's response.

Why did HAMAS start a new war now? Their main sponsor is Iran. Iran needs an enemy now, so that the populace rallies to the government. With the drop in oil prices, Iran's economy has tanked. Now, patriotic Iranians have decided that they want to be suicide bombers against Israel.

Sounds like a tail wagging a dog, to me.....

Labels: , ,

|

The Marines get the last laugh

Click the link. Trust me.


http://www.codepinkforpeace.com/

If you put this into the browser, you get the same result.

OOORAH!

Labels:

|

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Thank God for Men Like These - SEMPER FI!

No greater love hath a man than to lay down his own life for his brothers.

This is what SEMPER FIDELIS means.

These two heroes exemplify the military tradition of STANDING YOUR POST.
They did that and saved dozens of fellow Marines and Iraqi police.

Fallen Marines to be awarded the Navy Cross.

Cpl. Jonathan Yale, 21, grew up poor in rural Virginia. He had joined the Marine Corps to put structure in his life and to help support his mother and sister. He was within a few days of heading home.

Lance Cpl. Jordan Haerter, 19, was from a comfortably middle-class suburb on Long Island. As a boy, he had worn military garb, and he had felt the pull of adventure and patriotism. He had just arrived in Iraq.

Maj. Gen. John Kelly, the top Marine in Iraq, wanted to know how the attack happened.
He went to Ramadi to interview Iraqi witnesses -- a task generals usually delegate to subordinates.

Some Iraqis told him they were incredulous that the two Marines had not fled.

When Marine technicians restored a damaged security camera, the images were undeniable.

While Iraqi police fled, Haerter and Yale had never flinched and never stopped firing as the Mercedes truck -- the same model used in the Beirut bombing -- sped directly toward them.

Without their steadfastness, the truck would probably have penetrated the compound before it exploded, and 50 or more Marines and Iraqis would have been killed. The incident happened in just six seconds.

"No time to talk it over; no time to call the lieutenant; no time to think about their own lives or even the American and Iraqi lives they were protecting," Kelly said. "More than enough time, however, to do their duty. They never hesitated or tried to escape."

h/t Neptunus Lex

Labels: , ,

|

Support Israel in New York City

Support Israel against the terrorists!

Rally:
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
5:00pm - 6:30pm
Outside of Israeli Consulate in NYC
Corner of E42nd & 2nd Ave.
New York, NY

h/t Gateway Pundit

Labels: , ,

|

Monday, December 29, 2008

We Told You So

but all of you global warming religious fanatics kept covering your ears, shouting "lalalalalalala!"

2008 was the year man made global warming was disproved.

Promoting anthropogenic warming

But? What about the poles!!!????

Hey, what's that big glowing thing in the sky?



Check the above links for scientific goodness....
h/t QandO

Labels: , ,

|

Time For True Virginians To Step Up

and stop this insanity. Unless you enjoy the idea of a sleazeball political hack holding the same office once held by Patrick Henry, Thoms Jefferson, James Monroe, and Henry Lee.

The Washington Post is running this story:

McAuliffe's Prowess As Fundraiser Grabs Spotlight in Va. Race

Already, McAuliffe is showing what's possible. Consider the courtship of Randal J. Kirk, a billionaire who has long been one of the biggest political donors in the state.
Brian J. Moran of Alexandria and Sen. R. Creigh Deeds of Bath, two Virginia Democrats running for governor, spent years wooing Kirk. But in mid-October, a newcomer to the Virginia political scene, McAuliffe, stopped by Kirk's Radford home to chat up his own potential bid.
Kirk, who has given Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) $660,000 since January 2006, had not met McAuliffe before. Yet they got along so well during their three-hour lunch that Kirk broke out the moonshine. "I wanted him to know where he was," Kirk
recalled.
During their meeting, McAuliffe did not ask Kirk for a campaign contribution. But McAuliffe made such an impression that Kirk did something a few weeks later that he said he had not done before: He called McAuliffe and pledged his support in advance of a contested primary.

Pardon me while I throw up.

Labels: , , ,

|

This Link Is A Wealth of Information

Code Pink for Peace

Thanks Yankeemom for the heads up, ChuckZ and Code Monkey for the hard work and Uncle Jimbo for just being Uncle Jimbo.

Labels: , , ,

|

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Who Gets To Decide?

When we've won, I mean. Who gets to say it? Who needs to say it to make it true, or believable, or justified?
My guess would be the people who actually did the heavy-lifting. The men and women who got their boots muddy, their hands dirty. The ones who sacrificed everything to get where we are today.
This past November, Zombietime came up with an idea that took off like wildfire. A Declaration of Victory in Iraq, and named 22 November as V-I Day.

If you haven't bothered to read the whole post, you should; because at the bottom of that post are excerpts from some people who did the heavy lifting, who got their hands dirty and their boots bloody fighting to free 27 million people from a monster and then spent 3 more years eradicating any and all of the idiots who decided to show up and be targets.

You see, I know some of those people personally. I count them among my friends, and they in turn consider me one. That in itself is an honor I would never have expected but because they consider me a friend, and because friends help each other, I'm going to do whatever it takes to give them what they earned, what they DESERVE.

A Victory Party A Victory Celebration A Victory Parade.
An acknowledgement of their sacrifices, their efforts, their hard work.

I can do it. I've done things like this in the past. They know that and they have offered words of encouragement and support.

We have big plans. We have some great ideas and we need your help and your support.
As zombietime says though, if you don't think we've won; if you're one of those that won't admit victory no matter what, fine. Ignore us.

But if you think we have finally crossed that line; if you think our military has done what the democrats and the VLWM said could not and would not happen, then jump on board.
It's time, people. The time is now, and the place is Washington DC.
Lets thank our military for a job well done and stick it in the faces of the naysayers.

Blogs that have linked to this post:
Army Wife:Rants from Ft Livingroom (I love that title)
A Soldiers Perspective

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

|

2000!

2000th Blog post for this blog!

On behalf of all of the bloggers of United Conservatives of Virginia,
those that have left,
and those that have had to go into hiding,
and those that continue to post,

Thank you all for reading and supporting this blog.


Please stop by often. Pull up a chair. Read the older posts. And argue with us if you don't agree with us. Or just say hi! in the comments.

Thanks, again. Merry Christmas, Happy Hannukah, and Happy New Year!

|

Or we can just drop it on Al Queada.....



I'm sure that this probably could qualify as a weapon against muslim extremists.....

Let the heart disease begin! Hat tips to my favorite Cajun and to Neatorama for this amazing recipe which can be found at the BBQ Addicts.

I present the Bacon Explosion.
Any recipe that starts off with:

2 pounds thick cut bacon
2 pounds Italian sausage

1 jar of your favorite barbeque sauce
1 jar of your favorite barbeque rub


HAS TO BE GREAT!





OMG! Cold beer and this on a nice cold evening around a fire........

On toasted French bread, perhaps with a garlic spread.....

I'm gonna cook two of 'em!

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Friday, December 26, 2008

USMC Iraq Christmas

Merry Christmas from the Marine Corps!

Labels:

|

Thursday, December 25, 2008

A Soldier's Christmas



Merry Christmas to all of our defenders. May God Bless you, every one.....

Thank you for Standing the Watch.

|

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Meaning of Christmas




Merry Christmas!

Labels: , ,

|

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Happy Hanukkah


Squidette demanded that we get up and let her light the menorah. So we did.

Happy Hanukkah!


Here is a great explanation of this festival, including a quote by George Washington.

Labels: ,

|

Saturday, December 20, 2008

National Geographic drinking the Gun Control Kool-Aid

I watched this show when it aired and had the exact same thought. I just couldn't critique the show with any justice. The only reasonable example of the average gun owner presented was that of a local woman that lives in Chesterfield. I present the letter to National Geographic from Gun Owners of America.

National Geographic TV Takes Aim At Your Guns

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

National Geographic Channel ran a show last night entitled, "Guns In America." According to the program, there are millions of misguided gun owners across the nation. Why? Because your guns are supposedly more likely to harm you than to help you in an emergency.

"As a society, we're totally out of control with weapons," said one Philadelphia cop who was interviewed during the show. "You need to limit access that people have to these type of firearms."

That was the basic thrust of the program. National Geographic recited the usual worn-out factoids that are peddled by the Brady Campaign. It only cited anti-gun cops. And for every person who was filmed stating he or she believed in a right to own firearms for self-defense, the program would cite "facts" to prove that such a hope was misplaced.

Gun owners should let the President and CEO of National Geographic know that the channel should stick to showing pictures of kangaroos and foliage -- images that we normally attribute to National Geographic's magazine -- and keep his personal, anti-gun views to his private conversations around the Christmas dinner table.

The National Geographic Channel presents itself as an educational, unbiased alternative. But "Guns in America" was hardly unbiased, as can be seen by the following agenda items that were pushed during the program:

1. "Guns in America" would have you believe that the guns in your home are 22 times more likely to kill a family member than to protect you. This statistic can (surprise, surprise!) be found on the Brady Campaign website, but its source has been highly discredited. The factoid originates with Arthur Kellerman, who has generated multiple studies claiming that guns are a net liability.1 But Kellerman has been found guilty of fudging his data, and even the National Academy of Sciences has stated that his "conclusions do not seem to follow" from his data.2

The truth of the matter is actually quite encouraging for gun owners. Anti-gun researchers for the Clinton Justice Department found that guns are used 1.5 million times annually for self-defense, which means that each year, firearms are used more than 50 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.3

Isn't that strange? You would think anti-gunners wouldn't mind citing a study that was commissioned by the Clinton Justice Department! Apparently, the results of the study didn't fit their agenda.

2. "Guns in America" overstates the number of children who die by unintentional gunfire. The program would have viewers believe that a child dies by accidental gunfire, once every two days. But you can only reach that figure if you count violent-prone teens as "children."

In fact, when you look at the statistics involving younger children (ages 0-14), you see that kids have a greater chance of dying from choking on things like the peanut butter and jelly sandwiches that you feed them.4 Hmm, why doesn't National Geographic want to report on those killer peanuts?

3. "Guns in America" portrays twelve times as many negative uses of guns as positive uses -- even though in the real world, the truth is quite the opposite (as guns are used at least 50 times more often to save life than take life). The program does start with a dramatization of a legitimate self-defense story with an actual 911 call playing in the background. But after that, every dramatization is about drive-by-shootings or cops being shot or gang-related warfare.

The lesson for the viewer is: Guns are bad.

4. "Guns in America" only quotes anti-gun "authorities," thus leaving the impression that all law-enforcement support gun control. Never mind the fact that when one looks at polls of the police community, they overwhelmingly hold pro-gun attitudes:

* Should any law-abiding citizen be able to purchase a firearm for sport or self defense? -- 93% of law-enforcement said yes.5

* Do you believe law-abiding citizens should be limited to the purchase of no more than one firearm per month? -- 70.1% of law-enforcement said no.6

* Do you agree that a national concealed handgun permit would reduce rates of violent crime as recent studies in some states have already reflected? -- 68.2% of law-enforcement said yes.7

It's bad enough that a liberal teacher's union controls the education of our kids in the public schools, and that many of them are being brainwashed with politically correct thinking. We don't need supposedly neutral programs like National Geographic peddling the Brady Campaign's favorite factoids to an unsuspecting public.

ACTION: Please contact Tim T. Kelly, the President and CEO of National Geographic Ventures (which includes their television division), and urge him to steer the NatGeo channel away from politics. If the National Geographic Channel can't run a balanced program -- where they use real statistics -- then they just need to stick to filming those cute little animals that helped make their magazine so famous.

You can go to http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/contact to cut-and-paste the sample letter below into their webform. Since you will need to select a Topic, please choose "I have a complaint." And for "Department," we would suggest selecting "Factual Questions" or "General."


---- Pre-written letter ----

Dear Mr. Kelly:

I will think twice before ordering the National Geographic magazine, because I don't want to help you fund any more anti-gun propaganda. Your Explorer show entitled "Guns In America" -- which has run several times this month -- was heavily slanted to the gun control position. The show used fallacious statistics without rebutting them, all in an effort to demonize firearms.

For example, "Guns in America" falsely claimed that guns in the home are 22 times more likely to kill a family member than to serve as protection. That is simply not true. The author of this study, Arthur Kellerman, has been discredited many times (by groups such as the National Academy of Sciences), so it's shameful that your channel would even cite his work.

Second, "Guns in America" overstates the number of children who die by unintentional gunfire. In fact, when you look at the statistics involving younger children (ages 0-14), you see that kids have a greater chance of dying from choking on things like the peanut butter and jelly sandwiches that you feed them. Can I expect to see a show in the near future highlighting the danger of feeding children?

Third, "Guns in America" portrays twelve times as many negative uses of guns as positive uses -- even though in the real world, the truth is quite the opposite. According to statistics from the Clinton Justice Department in 1997, guns are used at least 50 times more often to save life than take life.

Finally, "Guns in America" only quotes anti-gun "authorities," thus leaving the impression that all law-enforcement support gun control. Never mind the fact that when one looks at polls of the police community, they overwhelmingly hold pro-gun attitudes. (Please see the poll results on the website for the National Association of Chiefs of Police.) Why were none of these authorities ever cited?

The National Geographic Society's purpose is "to increase and diffuse geographic knowledge while promoting the conservation of the world's cultural, historical, and natural resources." I would submit to you that pushing gun control is far afield from your stated purpose.

Sincerely,


--------------------------------

ENDNOTES:

1 Arthur Kellerman has generated multiple studies that claim gun owners are more likely to be injured by their guns than to use those guns in self-defense. His results range from 3 to 22 to 43 times more likely to be injured by a gun in the home. His methodology has been debunked, however, many times over. (See endnote 2.)

2 See http://www.gunowners.org/sk0701.htm . Also, see Charles F. Wellford, John Pepper, Carol Petrie, Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review (National Research Council of the National Academies, 2004), p. 118.

3 See http://www.gunowners.org/sk0802.htm

4 See "Children Accidental Death Rates (Ages 0-14)," Gun Control Fact Sheet (2004) at http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm

5 National Association of Chiefs of Police, 20th Annual Survey Results (Survey questions sent to Chiefs of Police and Sheriffs in the United States: 2008).

6 National Association of Chiefs of Police, 15th Annual Survey Results (Survey questions sent to Chiefs of Police and Sheriffs in the United States).

7 Ibid.

Labels: , , ,

|

They Can't Blame Republicans For This

What if there was corruption and there were no Republicans to blame for it?

Illinois and Chicago.... Who runs it?
Senators:Barack Obama & Dick Durbin
Representative:Jesse Jackson, Jr.
Illinois Governor:Rod Blogo jevich (arrested)
Illinois House leader:Mike Madigan
Illinois Attorney General: Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike)
Chicago Mayor:Richard M.Daley (son of Mayor Richard J. Daley) 1968 Chicago

The leadership in Illinois? .....all Democrats.
Thank you for the combat zone in Chicago.
Body count in the last six months 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago
221 killed in Iraq.
State pension fund - $44 Billion in debt, worst in the country.
Cook County (Chicago) sales tax - 10.25% highest in the country. (Look it up).
Chicago school system- rated one of the worst in the country.
Of course, they're all blaming each other. They can't blame Republicans because there aren't any.
This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois.
And he's going to fix"Washington politics for us?
Good luck and may God help us

Labels: , , , ,

|

Friday, December 19, 2008

Test yourself

Test your Civics Literacy! Inquiring minds want to know.

You answered 33 out of 33 correctly — 100.00 %

Average score for this quiz during December: 74.7%
Average score: 74.7%


WoooHoooo! I'm Number One!

Ahemm.....,
Sorry

Labels: ,

|

Why can't we get good small cars in the USA?

Ford has just announced that it DOES NOT want Congress to bail it out. Apparently Ford has realized that the strings that come with that money are actually hangman's nooses. Ford realized that the only business blowing through cash faster than they are is Congress.....

In its collective infinite wisdom, Congress demands that the Big Three sell small, high mpg vehicles. BUT, they can't sell the same cars that sell like hot cakes overseas. You know, over in small car land, Europe. Or more specifically, England.

The Ford Fiesta gets 65 mpg. Its sporty. It carries five adults. Its diesel.

And that last is why it can't be sold here. The USA is addicted to the diesel tax aimed at big trucks. The cars are built in Great Britain. Ford realizes that they would not be able to sell enough cars here to make it feasible to either import the car or build a local factory.

Just think how many cars Ford could sell if they had marketing like this:


Labels: , ,

|

The New Bob Hope


Deployed in 2003, I had the chance to see Gary Sinise on a USO tour. All he did was walk on stage, without his band, but he got a rock star's welcome. Hardened combat vets were screaming like groupies: "Lt. Dan! Lt. Dan!" You could see the tears in his eyes at the welcome.

Here's the story about the "new Bob Hope."

Michael Yon, a Special Forces vet and the pre-eminent war journalist of our time, communicated his admiration in a dispatch from Bahrain: "Gary is a true friend of the American soldier. He does not hesitate to travel into war zones to express his admiration and personal support for those who defend us. He visits wounded soldiers, some of whom I personally know. All love him.

"Soldiers from privates to generals admire Gary for his dedication to a cause greater than any of us. Gary's dedication went much further. He personally supported sending millions of dollars worth of school and clothing supplies to Iraqi children. I saw this effort with my own eyes. Gary Sinise is a Great American."

Labels: , ,

|

Links for Veterans

Castle Argghhh! has put up a tremendous resource for veterans.

Please pass this information on to every Veteran you know.

Nearly 100% of this information is free and available for all veterans, the only catch is: you have to ask for it, because they won’t tell you about a specific benefit unless you ask for it. It's just how the bureaucracy works. You need to know what questions to ask so the right doors open for you - and then be ready to have an advocate who is willing to work with and for you, stay in the process, and press for your rights and your best interests. Those advocates are the VSOs.

Labels: , ,

|

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Warriors The Movie

|

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

When Is A Hate Crime Not A Hate Crime?

Silly, when the target is predominately Christian and patriotic of course. Then it's just arson by a gang of maniacal fairies.

Doug Patton has some thoughts.

So let me see if I have this straight. The media fell all over itself during the Obama campaign avoiding an in-depth look at the vitriol flowing like a river of vomit out of Wright's Chicago church. Yet, when Sarah Palin was named as John McCain's choice for vice president, every major news outlet in the country put reporters on planes to Alaska to "investigate" this woman's strange church. And now that this same church has been burned -- an act that would surely be hailed as a "hate crime" had it happened at Obama's church -- we are told that a ministry to help homosexuals who want to leave their deviant lifestyle may be the reason for the attack.
Meanwhile, the loving, forgiving members of the Wasilla Bible Church are turning the other cheek after their church has just been burned to the ground. Can you imagine Jeremiah Wright and his ilk having such a reaction had it been the Trinity United Church of Christ that was attacked?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Monday, December 15, 2008

The Messiah Has No Clothes

Once again, America is being conned.
65,000,000 people voted for a fraud because they bought the fable.

Why The Media Blackout On Obama’s Citizenship?
By JR Dieckmann
Tuesday, December 9, 2008

It seems that everyone today is asking why there is no media coverage of the many legal challenges to Obama’s eligibility to become president, based upon many valid questions regarding his citizenship. Instead of simply answering these challenges with documented proof of his citizenship, he has chosen instead to conceal from public view, every single legal document he has, and spend a half million dollars in lawyer fees to fight the cases in hopes of getting them dismissed or delayed indefinitely.
The documents he has had sealed that would answer this looming question are his original birth certificate, his passport, his college records from both Columbia and Harvard universities, his health records, and his original Selective Service registration - if it exists at all. Many inconsistencies in the Selective Service registration form, which has appeared on the web indicate it has been forged or altered. Obama seems determined to hide his true identity. Some investigators are even questioning the identity of his paternal father, based on his stronger resemblance to Frank Marshal Davis and Malcolm X than to Barack Obama Sr.
The electronic copy of the document posted on Obama’s website, authenticated by the Hawaii Department of Health and FactCheck.org, and being called his birth certificate is not a birth certificate. The Hawaiian “Certification Of Live Birth” is a document available to any child in Hawaii over one year of age, regardless of where the child was born. The Hawaiian “Certificate Of Live Birth” is a Hawaiian birth certificate showing that the child was born in Hawaii, and Obama doesn‘t seem to have one. At least, not one he is willing to show us.
How could 44 million Americans vote for a man they really know nothing about other than what he has told them? Has any president ever before in history been elected without revealing the most basic of documents like a birth certificate and academic records? Remember how Bush’s and Kerry’s college and military records were highly scrutinized during their campaigns? For all we really know about Obama, he could be a space alien sent to Earth as a small child. Yet 44 million people voted for him based on nothing more than his campaign rhetoric of undefined “hope“ and “change,” and anti-American redistribution of wealth.
Two of the cases challenging Obama’s citizenship have just been dismissed by the Supreme Court, but several more have already been filed for review. Citizens across the country are signing petitions, blogging, and posting on the Internet. They are demanding that this issue be resolved before Obama is elected by the Electoral College on Dec. 15, or at the latest by Jan. 20 when he is scheduled to be sworn into office. Yet in spite of this nationwide outrage, the media refuses even to mention what is likely to be a major news story of the century - people want to know why.
I suspect that the media aren’t covering the story because they are convinced that Obama will become our next president, and they’ve decided to be safe, rather than sorry. We have all seen what happens to people who publicly challenge Obama or disagree with him - reporters tossed off his campaign plane; investigation of Joe the Plumber, challengers smeared, etc. Obama and his surrogates attempt either to shut them up or shut them down. Any mention of his citizenship status is dismissed as a conspiracy theory or a hoax. Yet we have only his word that he is an American citizen, and that seems to be all the evidence that his supporters have as well on which to base their cynical and arrogant assumptions about his citizenship and our grounds to question it.
Any media outlet that covers this issue will likely be denied a seat in the White House press room as well as any other access to White House staff and the presumed president. They would also be concerned about their broadcast license being threatened by an Obama administration. I suspect what has happened is that media outlet executives have given strict orders to their news directors and editors that this story is not to be mentioned for fear of repercussions by the proposed future administration should it actually become a reality.
MSNBC and perhaps NBC doesn’t seem to share this fear, and for good reason. They have been deep into the tank for Obama all along and have been one of his best propaganda outlets. MSNBC is the only news channel that has actually giving any coverage to the controversy but always paints it as nothing more than a right wing conspiracy theory and laughs it off. We’ll see who has the last laugh.
Fox News, which we would expect to take some interest in this story has been consistently and conspicuously silent on the issue. My suspicions mentioned above were reinforced yesterday during the Fox News Watch program when Eric Shawn was talking with Liz Trotta about some conservative writers on the Internet who “praised” Obama for some of his “centrist” appointments. As Trotta discussed the various articles, Shawn interjected that blogs were widely talking about Obama’s citizenship. Trotta quickly and disdainfully dismissed it and changed the subject which was not referred to again. It was almost as though she was reminding him that the subject is not to be brought up.
Even talk radio commentators are afraid to talk about it. Rush Limbaugh stated that he is not sure if it “passes the smell test,” and Sean Hannity has not even mentioned it as far as I know except when a caller brought it up. Hannity remarked that he didn’t know enough about it and moved to another topic.
Hannity may be restricted by his bosses, but Rush is the CEO of his own broadcasting network and has nothing to fear except the possible loss of some of his franchise radio stations across the country which carry his show. Rush is known for facing down any amount of political pressure or politician so he must have his own reasons for not giving it credibility on the air. Privately, I suspect Limbaugh takes this matter very seriously but he has two relatives on the bench; Stephen N. Limbaugh, Sr., Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. and other friends who may have advised him to avoid the subject until the issue is officially in the hands of the courts.
Obama, or as Dr. Jack Wheeler calls him “Zero,” has campaigned on transparency and uniting the country - a statement many of us laughed at from the start. It’s time “Zero” showed some transparency of his own by disclosing his original birth certificate; his college records; his health records; his unaltered draft registration; his campaign contributors; his true connections, citizenship, and allegiance to Indonesia and Kenya; and show the American people that he is willing to come clean and be honest with us. In his brief political career so far, “Zero” has hidden more secrets from the American people than George W. Bush has in his entire 8 years as President of the United States.
On his To The Point News website, Jack Wheeler has divulged that he knows “the true story” about Obama’s birth situation, and it is “wild,” but he - and the contact person who also runs a major news site and told him the facts - are apparently not yet prepared to reveal this shocker to the public. Wheeler said he will let the source of the information reveal it in his own time. ”...The details of what he told me is for him to reveal when he chooses, not me. I can tell you it is OMG wild.”
Any hopes of uniting the country will depend heavily on Mr. Obama’s willingness to disclose the personal documents he has been hiding under lock and key, thereby erasing all doubts about his eligibility to become our president. Until he does that, he will be considered an illegitimate usurper of the presidency by at least half of the American people and will be given none of the respect and allegiance afforded to other presidents.
He will be viewed as a traitor to this country from the day he takes the oath of office and America will be considered a country without a president. Furthermore if the military has any patriotism for America, they will consider themselves to be armed forces without a Commander in Chief. There will be no uniting of the country, only further division and animosity toward the president and the government.
The consequences of not resolving this problem before inauguration day will be catastrophic for the country. Should “Zero” be found not to be a natural born citizen of this country after he takes office, it will be the duty of Congress to impeach him and the duty of the Justice Department to take him into custody on charges of treason and fraud. Those charges should also extend to Howard Dean and other leaders of the Democrat party as well as the state of Illinois Democrat party officials and the person who placed the usurper’s name into the nomination for president. All of these entities should have vetted the candidate for eligibility before his name was ever placed on the ballot.
But there’s more. It would mean that every directive, every Executive Order, every piece of legislation, every “signing statement” and 100% of his Cabinet plus thousands of other appointments would be unlawful. Any judicial appointees would have to resign. All of the above personnel would have to be immediately replaced as would his V.P. who would - under these tumultuous circumstances - NOT assume the office of the presidency.
Should this become the case, the Constitution does provide a procedure for resolving it by placing the Vice President in the position of acting president. The 25th Amendment states in Section 1:
“In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.”
But there is problem with this. It assumes that the vice president was legally appointed by a legitimate presidential candidate or president. If the president is illegitimate, then any selections to his cabinet would be invalid including the vice president.
The 20th Amendment provides for the case of a president elect and vice president elect being found unqualified for the office, but this applies to the candidate prior to being sworn in. Section 3 of Amendment XX states in part:
“… or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
These may be helpful in determining a procedure for replacing the president and vice president, but neither one was intended to apply to the situation we face today, or may face after “Zero” is sworn in. But neither amendment applies to both president and vice president being removed from office. From other language in these Amendments, it would appear that it would be up to the House of Representatives to select an acting president until such time as a qualified president can be elected. God only knows whom this House would select.
Clearly such a turn of events would be cataclysmic for America, because it would lay us wide open for terror attacks everywhere in the nation, due to a temporarily leaderless country in utter turmoil - all due to the hubris and thirst for power by one man and his disgraceful minions.
We must also consider the very real possibility that “Zero‘s” citizenship issue will be ignored and the courts will permit him to serve as president in spite of his lack of proper natural born citizenship status. A precedent will have been set for any foreigner from anywhere in the world to assume control of the United States of America. Imagine President Soros - President Mugabe - President Assad - or perhaps even President Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
This issue must be pursued to it’s legal conclusion. The public must not fall prey to the liberal media propaganda that attempts to paint conservatives, who believe and trust in the Constitution as the law of the land, as nutcase right wing conspirators. If Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States of America, then show us the proof. Release the critical documents. We will accept nothing less.
In 1959, Nikita Khrushchev said “We will bury you.” He also said “We will take you over from within.” Of course, he was talking about communism. Obama could very well be the final nail in America’s coffin as a student of Marxism and a usurper of the presidency of the Untied States of America. His citizenship status must be verified and this issue resolved without delay or America may be facing a revolt like never before seen in the history of the country.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Reality UPDATE

Here's an idea for all you tree-hugging wackjobs who think we have too much CO2 in the air.
If you're really serious about reducing CO2 emissions, I have a plan that will reduce CO2 levels by 50% in no time at all. It won't cost anyone any money, it is fool-proof, and it will go a long way towards showing all of us that you're serious about the state of the environment....

STOP BREATHING FOR 5 MINUTES!!!
The resulting brain damage would be negligible, since you're already brain-dead.


Last night on TV, I saw a commercial that really pissed me off. The premise of the commercial is that clean coal technology is not real. A guy is wandering around a desolate landscape, yelling into the microphone, telling us all about clean coal.

I help build clean coal facilities. I've helped build one, and we're working on another one. The technology is real and it works.

This commercial is blatantly false and very offensive to me, and I am seriously considering a lawsuit against the perpetrators.

I shoulda figured. Alliance for Climate Change. AlBore and his minions. They would prefer we live in caves and cook over campfires; then they'd bitch about the wood smoke.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

|

Friday, December 12, 2008

Do we understand our enemy?

We are still at war. With the upcoming inauguration and the lessening of hostile action in Iraq, we seem to have forgotten that. We seem to think that if we only a) kill/capture Bin Laden b) free the oppressed muslims from tyranny c) kill all of the "radical" muslims that we will have peace.

We don't seem to realize that, like any faithful, the "typical" muslim takes the words and tenets of their religion to heart. Their worldview does not seem strange or dangerous to themselves. While the majority of muslims don't take up arms, they also won't try to stop "militants" from attacking non-muslims. Islam is both a religion and a political system. While western Christians may apply the teachings of Christ to their daily lives, their religion does not have the rule of law.
Islam IS THE LAW. If one breaks the tenets of the Quran, that person is penalized by the society.

We will not be able to "change the minds" of the majority of the 1 billion or so muslims in the world. We can only hope that they do not wish to take up arms.

The alternative is horrible.


WorldNetDaily - Benjamin Shapiro gets it. Tell me why he's wrong.

Enough with the pseudonyms. Western civilization isn't at war with terrorism any more than it is at war with grenades.

Enough with the psychoanalysis. They don't hate us because of Israel.

Enough with the niceties. We don't lose our souls when we treat our enemies as enemies.

Enough with the words. Talking with Iran without wielding the threat of force, either economic or military, won't help.

Enough with the faux allies. We don't gain anything by pretending that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are true allies.

Enough with the myths. Not everyone on earth is crying out for freedom.

Enough with the lies. Stop telling us that Islam is a religion of peace. If it is, prove it through action.

Enough. After the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the plane downed in Pennsylvania, the endless suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks in Israel, the Bali bombings, the synagogue bombing in Tunisia, the LAX shootings, the Kenyan hotel bombing, the Casablanca attacks, the Turkey synagogue attacks, the Madrid bombings, the London bombings, and the repeated attacks in India culminating in the Mumbai massacres – among literally thousands of others – it's about time that the West got the point: We're in a war. Our enemies are determined. They will not quit just because we offer them Big Macs, Christina Aguilera CDs, or even the freedom to vote. They will not quit just because we ensure that they have Qurans in their Guantanamo cells, or because we offer to ban "The Satanic Verses" (as India did). They will only quit when they are dead. It is our job to make them so, and to eliminate every obstacle to their destruction.

So enough. No more empty talk. No more idle promises. No more happy ignorance, half measures, or appeasement-minded platitudes. The time for hard-nosed, uncompromising action hasn't merely come – it's been overdue by seven years. The voice of our brothers' blood cries out from the ground.


And the writer at Mere Rhetoric have a very interesting take on the Isreal-Palestine conflict:

And of course - as left-leaning peace process diplomats now admit openly - it's actually Palestinian political instability that suffocates the peace process. Abbas can't make peace and Hamas won't make peace. But somehow that turns out to be Israel's fault. Because if it wasn't then Israeli concessions wouldn't translate into a peace deal. And then it wouldn't be possible to diplomatically stabilize the Middle East. And then where would the State Department be? So Rice is angling to have UN call for a new Arab state. Because why not?

And because I've now gotten two obnoxious emails on this question in two days: the problem with misguided US foreign policy toward Israel isn't just that it screws a major US ally. It's that diplomats who focus obsessively on Israel do it as a result of willful denial about political Islam. If you believe that political Islam is a global threat driven by a pathological ideology expressed through asymmetric and urban warfare - then Israel is incidental. But if you really need terrorism to be an misguided response to underlying political problems - which is to say, if you're the State Department - then Israel becomes the central issue.


And in a more immediate example: Why does Khalid Sheik Mohammed want to be executed? Who cares? by Andrew McCarthy at National Review Online.

We don’t understand our enemies any better than we did when they first strode out on that great American stage, the federal courtroom, 15 years ago.

What we don’t yet seem to grasp, even after all that’s gone on these last two decades, is that our politics and our law are of interest only to us. They matter nothing to jihadists. It’s a fatuous exercise in self-absorption to suppose otherwise — and a foolish one since it demonstrates for all to see that we still don’t get it. The delusion that we can change our enemies by changing ourselves is what makes the useful idiots useful.

KSM doesn’t see Bush or Obama. He sees an American president. He sees a symbol — the embodiment of a people and culture that are his mortal enemy.

Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal, cowboy or solon — these distinctions matter to us. KSM couldn’t care less.

For radical Islam, it’s not about us; it’s about them. KSM isn’t about us. He’s about KSM. There is no system we can devise, nothing we can do or not do, no one we can elect or anoint, that will alter how we are perceived by the millions who share the jihadist worldview, if not jihadist methods.


We don't seem to understand our enemy. From SaneWorks.

What explains the fact that Sunni Wahhabi Salafi followers of Saudi Arabia (9/11) and Deobandis in Pakistan (Mumbai) embrace the same essential doctrine of Jihad against the infidels? Or, the fact that also the Shia Muslims of Iran and of course the Shia Hizbullah in Lebanon adhere to this shared theo-political-military doctrine? And, to these we can add the Jihadis of Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Chechen, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Gaza, London, Europe and the United States.

The narrative we most often hear is that somehow--usually due to poverty, oppression, colonialism, or imperialism--this eclectic group of mujahideen have somehow taken a noble and peaceable religion and applied incredibly the same "toxic ideology" to a love-peace-mercy theology and that it has metastasized into global jihad. The problem with this "toxicity" narrative is the rather stubborn fact that such disparate groups sharing no common national interests, racial affinities, cultural ties, and language have each come down on all fours on the almost identical legal doctrine of Jihad and they all rely explicitly on traditional, authoritative, and pedigreed Shariah in their respective understandings of this law of Jihad.


Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Thursday, December 11, 2008

OBAMA HAS SAVED US!

Remember when THE ONE said this: "...this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal..."?

Well, ITS TRUE!!

We're saved! Global warming is OVER! Do you hear me? OVER!!!!!!!!!

IT'S SNOWING IN NEW ORLEANS!

Ski scenic Monkey Hill at the zoo!


Labels: ,

|

Remember, Idle hands are the Devil's workshop...

Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt.




Throw Something - Amazing videos are here


h/t by Some guy that likes to Hit Metal with a Hammer and build really cool stuff.
(and he has interesting things to say on his blog, too.)

Labels: ,

|

Helicopter Gun Ship - .45 Cal., that is....



I, for one, welcome our robot overlords.....

Hail Skynet!



I REALLY want Santa to bring me one of these....

h/t Theo

Labels: ,

|

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

So we have to bailout the Big 3? How's that first bailout working for you?

|

Interesting Facts

Some unreported stats about the 2008 election
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008 Presidential election:

-Number of States won by: Democrats: 20; Republicans: 30
-Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000; Republicans: 2,427,000
-Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million; Republicans: 143 million
-Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2; Republicans: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in rented or government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.


The original posting with this information is below at this link: http://www.newsweek.com/id/163337.

Labels: , ,

|

Putting It In Perspective

The Democratic Culture Of Corruption
By Michelle Malkin
December 10, 2008

Editor's Note: The following column contains language that may be offensive.

Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi can stop clucking now. For the last three years, Democratic leaders cheered GOP ethics woes. Dean accused Republicans of making "their culture of corruption the norm." Pelosi touted cleanliness as a liberal virtue. But with the eye-popping pay-for-play and bribery case against Democratic Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich topping a year of nationwide Democratic scandals, the corruption chickens are coming home to roost.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald called the breadth and depth of charges against Blagojevich and his Democratic Chief of Staff John Harris "staggering." That's an understatement. Anything that breathed was a potential shakedown target. It's the Chicago way. Democrat Blago's so dirty he'd hit up a children's hospital for money. Oh, wait. He's accused of doing that, too.

Democrat Blago allegedly conspired to use his power to appoint President-elect Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat as a bargaining chip for financial payment. He explored trading on that authority for an appointment as Health and Human Services secretary or as an ambassador or for installment in a cushy union position. (He discussed his trading scheme with an unnamed "SEIU (Service Employees International Union) official" and unnamed "various consultants" in Washington.)

According to the criminal complaint released yesterday, he also tried to leverage his influence over the sale of Wrigley Field (owned by Tribune media company) in an attempt to get Chicago Tribune editorial writers who called for his impeachment fired -- which illustrates the very perils of media/government entanglements I warned about in my newspaper bailout column last week. His wife, Patricia Blagojevich, was apparently in on the thuggery, too. Taking a break from her first lady duties advocating "on behalf of women and children," she is heard in taped discussions about the Chicago Tribune/Wrigley Field deal telling a governor's aide "to hold up that f**king Cubs sh*t. ... F**k them."

Pelosi, champion of women as political cleaner-uppers, was unavailable for comment.
Fitzgerald says President-elect Obama was not implicated in the plethora of charges against Democrats Blago and Harris. The national media went out of their way to absolve him, too. But declaring Team Obama's hands clean -- especially with Blago crony and indicted Obama donor Tony Rezko in the middle of it all -- is premature.

(And if you're wondering why I keep putting "Democrat" in front of the accused corruptocrats, it's because the mainstream newspapers can't seem to remember to identify their party prominently the way they do when Republicans are nabbed.)

Chicago's Fox affiliate reports that Obama Chief of Staff and Chicago hometown heavy Rahm Emanuel was the catalyst for the Blago takedown and suggests Rahm-bo tipped off the feds. If so, this raises more questions than it answers about who on the transition team may have talked to Blago and his shakedown artists about what and when. Needless to say, if it were the Republican Bush administration tied to the Blago bust, the White House press corps would be frothing like a pack of Michael Vick's pit bulls.

Democrats and the media can no longer rest on the old rationalization that Blago is an exception to the "we're cleaner than thou" rule. 2008 was the year of Democratic Reps. William "Cold Cash" Jefferson, Charlie "Sweetheart Deals" Rangel, and former Detroit Mayor Kwame "Text Me" Kilpatrick.

It was the year Democratic Massachusetts State Senator Dianne Wilkerson got caught stuffing bribes from an FBI informant down her shirt. It was the year 12 Democratic leaders and staffers in Pennsylvania's state Capitol were stung in a massive corruption scandal involving cash, sex and abuse of public office. And it was the year of multimillion-dollar embezzlement scandals at Democratic satellite offices of ACORN and the SEIU.


The Democrats have met the culture of corruption, and it looks like it ain't just elephants among the jackasses soiling public office.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Unaware and Ignorant

The president elect was unaware that the 'reverand" who he considered his spiritual mentor, conducted the weekly sermons at his church, married him and his wife and baptized his children was an anti-American, prejudice nut who preaches racist, black liberation theology.

Obama was completely ignorant of the fact Bill Ayers was a notorious domestic terrorist, and it actually made no matter, as obama really had no realtionship with Ayers, which Ayers now refutes as an inaccurate statement.

Barry hussein obama claims he never knew that ACORN was corrupt and that he had no affiliation with them even though he used to work for them and he gave them thousands of dollars. ACORN's ballot-stuffing & voter registration fraud are the main reasons obama won the electorate.

Despite his well-known muslim sympathies, obama denies having any ties with anti-American, anti-Semetic, nation of islam leader louis farakhan--even though he calls obama, "The Messiah."

Obama claims he is an American citizen born in Hawaii even though his African family positively says he was born in Kenya in the village of the muslim guy who got his mother pregnant. He won't address the public's questions/concerns regarding this matter and won't produce a valid birth certificate to prove his American citizenship and most importantly his eligibilty to become president per the US Constitution.

Obama denies having significant dealings with Tony Rezko, the notorious Chicago political bagman/crimminal gangster, now convicted felon, and real estate entrepaneur who curiously sold obama his home and an ajoining piece of real state for an astonishingly paltry sum.

Now, obama denies having any conversation with the Governor of Illinois regarding obama's vacated U.S. Senate seat, a fact refuted by obama's campaign director, Mr. Axelrod. Now it seems that Mr. Axelrod has a faulty memory as to exactly what the post election conversations were that Obama had with Blagojevich.

This is the man, this is the president elect, a man who surrounded himself with men of questionable sanity, ethical standards, integrity, and plain old common sense and was unaware of anything untoward, saw nothing, and heard nothing. A man who conceivably wil have his hand on America's nuclear trigger.

Is this what the American electorate really wanted to put in the White House?

There is no doubt that Blagojevich will tell the FBI everything they want to know to keep from spending the remainder opf his life in prison. Will Obama have the shortest term as chief executive in American History? We shall soon see. President Joe Biden----? Hillary must be apoplectic.

A lot of folks must be laughing, even more must be praying . . .

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Governor Blagojevich-arrested by the FBI

Chicago politics has long been a synonym for corruption. Say "Mayor Daley", and no other example is needed.

Now, we have another two word example. Governor Blagojevich.

The Illinois Governor has been arrested by the FBI on federal corruption charges. Apparently, he and his aide are suspected of wanting to sell the President-elect's former Senate seat to the highest bidder.

I wonder just how closely Obama is entwined in the Chicago/Illinois political machine?

Just askin', is all.....








"the usual suspects"

Labels: , ,

|

Monday, December 08, 2008

Can We Afford N0bama's Infrastructure Program?

This story was originally posted with the title "Can Obama Afford His Infrastructure Program?"
It's not his money, it's ours. I work in construction; I've seen the prices rise over the last 6 months. This ain't gonna happen unless they raise taxes. The price of concrete is at an all time high. Asphalt is through the roof.

On Saturday, President-elect Obama pledged the biggest road and bridge construction program since the 1950s. But has anyone in Washington asked Wilson County, Tennessee road superintendent Steve Armistead about the price of asphalt
these days? For that matter, has anyone thought about how much more cement is likely to cost when that industry has to pass through costs associated with its carbon dioxide emissions?

Bottom line: the two most essential materials of an infrastructure rebuilding program – asphalt and cement – could be so expensive that Obama won’t be able to fix nearly as many roads, bridges and buildings as he wants to, and thus fewer jobs will be created.

Armistead told The Tennessean newspaper earlier this month that, notwithstanding crude oil’s precipitous price decline, in November the price of asphalt, which is made from crude, was more than double what it was last January. Rodney Carmichael, head of the Tennessee County Highways Officials Association, told the newspaper asphalt prices will remain high because, when crude prices shot up, oil refiners tweaked their equipment to refine more gasoline, leaving less feedstock available to make asphalt. “The newer technology has backfired,” Carmichael said.

Speaking of backfires, the Obama administration’s plan to force CO2-emitting manufacturers to have to pay for their emissions appears likely to cause cement prices to surge.

The cement industry is one of the world’s worst CO2 emitters. To exempt cement manufacturers from CO2 emissions reductions would make the entire program Obama wants to impose a joke. And yet, if Canada is any example, forcing cement manufacturers to have to pay extra to offset the CO2 emissions they generate could cause cement prices to skyrocket.

Facing a carbon tax, British Columbia cement manufacturers recently told government officials in Ottawa that such a tax would eliminate their profit margins for years to come. The officials made it sound as if, even if they raise prices, they may still have to cut back manufacturing.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Use it or lose it. The 2nd Amendment, that is....

Ride Fast and Shoot Straight nails it in a great essay. Excerpt:

...if terrorism continues to rear it's ugly head here, the targets will be carefully chosen to be unarmed. Such as airliners on 9/11/2001. Or shopping malls in some states. Some states like not Texas, nor Nevada. You know who you are.

Where ever trouble strikes in this world, the good gun culture knows what to do. Guns alone are never enough, you have to know guns to know peace.



Go read the rest: The Superiority of the American Gun Culture.

Labels: , ,

|

If you own it, learn to carry it.

So True.

h/t: A Keyboard and a .45

From Breda:
Carry your gun - it's a lighter burden than regret.

Labels: , , ,

|

Plaxico on gun safety



What not to do....

|

Sunday, December 07, 2008

From the WTF Are They Thinking File

I'm not sure this is for real, but it's so stupid, it probably is real.
If I lived in New Mexico, I'd be thinking about re-locating as far away as possible, just in case God doesn't have a sense of humor.

A gay version of the Bible, in which God says it is better to be gay than straight, is to be published by an American film producer.
New Mexico-based Revision Studios will publish The Princess Diana Bible – so named because of Diana's "many good works", it says – online at princessdianabible.com in spring 2009. A preview of Genesis is already available, in which instead of creating Adam and Eve, God creates Aida and Eve.
"And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Aida, and she slept: and he took one of her ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib, which the Lord God had taken from woman, made he another woman, and brought her unto the first.
And Aida said, 'This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of me. Therefore shall a woman leave her mother, and shall cleave unto her wife: and they shall be one flesh.'
And they were both naked, the woman and her wife, and were not ashamed."

The film studio said it would also adapt and direct the revised Bible as a two-part mini-series, The Gay Old Testament and The Gay New Testament, once it is completed.

"There are many different versions of the Bible; I don't see why we can't have one," said Max Mitchell, who directed the science fiction comedy Horror in the Wind, in which an airborne formula invented by two biogeneticists reverses the world's sexual orientation.

"I got the idea for the Princess Diana Bible from Horror In The Wind," he added. "After the world becomes gay, religious people create The Princess Diana Bible, which says that gay is right and straight is a sin. Then they burn all the King James Bibles."

The move has already provoked upset among Christians, with the blogger Douglas Howe at the Idol Chatter site describing it as "inspired by a political agenda and one person's desire to contort not only the text but the very context of it to suit his own perspective".

There was also criticism on Mitchell's Princess Diana Bible site, where one commentator said the choice of title was "very disrespectful to the late Princess Diana … It's just one more thing to link her to what many people believe is immoral. Sad, very sad indeed."

But Mitchell said: "There are 116 versions of the Bible, why is any of them better than ours?"

Uh, maybe because you left out the part where God instructs them to be fruitful and multiply?
The evolutionists are going to be really upset with this one.

Labels: , , , ,

|

More Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case Info

Press Release:
Lightfoot v Bowen...Mission Viejo, Ca. (NS/OrlyTaitz) -
On December 2nd a Petition for an extraordinary Writ of Mandamus was filed in the Supreme Court of California.

This petition (as seen in the attachment) states that Mr. Obama has not proven his "natural born citizen" status and cannot be sworn as a president of the United States and the commander in Chief.

There are 7 plaintiffs in this case and they include Vice Presidential candidate for Ron Paul, on the ballot in CA, Ms Gail Lightfoot, 4 electors and two registered voters...A number of plaintiffs in this action are veterans and former servicemen, that are concerned about a prospect of Mr Obama becoming the Commander in Chief of the US army, without providing any information, as to his citizenship at birth and currently, particularly citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain (Kenya was a British colony in 1961, at the time of Mr. Obama's birth) without providing his immigration records, passports or even as much as the original birth certificate from Hawaii, that is supposed to show the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, that can be verified against the vital records from the hospital.

Within two days of filing on Friday 12.05.08. at 9:45 PM, the Supreme court of California has issued a denial, that will allow the attorney on the case, Ms. Orly Taitz, an Application for Emergency Stay in the Supreme Court of the United States as early as Monday, the 8th of December. The case will be reviewed by the Supreme Court JudgeAnthony Kennedy...

PDF file of the petition can be found on:http://drorly.blogspot.com...

More information on the case will be provided at the press conferenceat the National Press Club in the Washington DC, to be held on 12.08.08. at 1:30 Eastern time...

Ms. Taitz is also one of two attorneys, representing Ambassador Alan Keyes et all against Ms. Bowen, CA Secretary of State et all. This case will be heard in CA Superior court prior to the Certification of votes...(pdf file of Keyes v Bowen is also on the drorly.blogspot.com)...
Orly Taitz, Esq...26302 La Paz ste 211Mission Viejo, Ca 92691--~--~---------~--~----~

The Lawyers involved in the Obama birth certificate case have asked for any concerned Veterans who are interested to show up Monday Dec. 8th at 1:30 PM ET in Washington, DC at the National Press Club for the Press Conference...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Friday, December 05, 2008

Why Hasn't This Been Published in America?

Barack, The Amazing Mr. Obama
02.12.2008
Source: Pravda.Ru
By Mark S. McGrew

Barack Obama is truly an amazing man, with many amazing friends. He has succeeded where countless others have failed. And he has also succeeded where many before him have succeeded with the same time honored methods.
He has managed to create an illusion of a Public Office that does not exist, The Office of the President Elect.

Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen.

But the man with no visible past, was blessed by a light shining from above on a Federal Judge, by having the lawsuit against him dismissed, three weeks after his non-response was proof that he is not a US citizen.

That lawsuit has since been taken to the US Supreme Court, where Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have until December 1, 2008 to answer the complaint made against them.

Another lawsuit by another attorney against him to prove he is a US citizen has been scheduled for a conference of Justices of the US Supreme Court on December 5, 2008.
Full documentation of the Philip Berg lawsuit can be seen here at ObamaCrimes.com and a copy of a full page ad regarding this in the Washington Times can be seen here.

A full page ad in the Chicago Tribune, asking Obama to prove his citizenship can be seen here.
Other lawsuits landed in the Supreme Court of The United States can be seen here.

Alan Keyes, a Presidential candidate has also filed a lawsuit in California Supreme Court to not certify the California Electors of the US Electoral College until Obama can prove that he is a US citizen. It is those Electors who decide who shall be President of the United States of America on December 15, 2008. That lawsuit can be seen here.

Barack Obama promised people what they wanted: Hope and Change, without ever saying what that hope and change were going to be. One of Obama’s much praised abilities is his way of being very articulate in his speeches.

Every con man walking free or in jail is an articulate speaker. Who would give their trust to a man who could not use the right words to convince his targets to trust him? Articulate speaking is no way to judge or rate the integrity of a person.

Every con game uses three ingredients against the target: Sell the dream. Push the greed button. Stress urgency.

Obama sold the dream of hope and change so desperately wanted by the American voters. He pushed the greed button by promising to take from the rich to give to the poor. And he stressed urgency by himself and his wife telling voters to vote early. Another final nail in the coffin a con man uses against his targets is “The Jack Call”. After your sucker has committed himself to buying your offer, but has not sent the check, the con man calls him with “Good news!!!” and constantly re-sells his target until the check has cleared and the funds are in the con man’s bank account.

The non-existent Office of the President Elect is the Jack Call. The constant news shots of his “involvement and concern” in national and world issues are the repeated Jack Calls.
It remains to be seen if Barry Sotero, Barack Obama or whatever his name is, is appointed President by the Electoral College.

The only “Certificate of Birth” that he has produced is not a Birth Certificate. It is a Certificate of Live Birth, which any foreign citizen can obtain by simply showing up at the Vital Records department of the State of Hawaii and showing the original Birth Certificate from the original birth place, regardless of what country the birth took place in. Forensic records experts have stated that the document Obama produced on his web site is a forgery.

The only comment made by the Hawaii Department of Vital Records is that they “Have seen the original Birth Certificate”. They never once have said he was born in Hawaii.
None of these lawsuits and suspicions mean as much as the fact that Obama can easily dispel all the legal actions and mistrust by simply producing a valid Birth Certificate. It matters not in the least that he has not proven his attendance at Harvard and Columbia University. It does not matter that any number of claims about his past and his experience have not been validated.

The only thing that matters is that he refuses to produce a valid Birth Certificate and instead spends thousands of dollars on attorneys and defies Federal lawsuits and State lawsuits asking him to produce one single piece of paper that most every citizen of every nation of the world has easy and rapid access to.

But beyond all of that controversy, there is one subject in this man’s activities that is truly astounding: There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that his beloved grandmother actually died on the day before the election as his campaign said she did. He said he would attend her funeral “In a few days”. He never did. Then he said he would have a funeral for her around the end of the year. What kind of person keeps their grandmother’s body on ice for two months? What kind of a person would play on the death of his grandmother to win “the sympathy vote”? Where is the proof that she died when she said she did? Normally, we could simply learn from the local coroner of a well known person’s death. But the only public comment made by the Honolulu Medical Examiner, who acts as coroner in Honolulu, Hawaii was, “We didn’t work that case.”

Barack Obama may just win his place in history as the greatest con man of all time. A hundred million people believed him and spent 600 million dollars to get him “elected” to the highest office in America, without ever knowing if he is or is not eligible to even run as an American citizen. It is either amazing that he will pull it off or it is amazing that so many millions of people believed him.

If the Electoral College appoints him as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country. The Courts, our police, our military will have no duty to obey anything he signs. It is also possible that certain people, who were part of and promoted the con, may be charged with Treason.

And if he does prove that he is a US citizen the questions remain: Why did he fight so long and so hard to not show that simple, single piece of paper when asked? Why would a man subject so many citizens of his country and leaders of other nations to such mistrust?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

|

Pelosi's Congress. The unreported facts.

Congress: Before and After the Democratic wins under Pelosi.

Labels: , ,

|

Fatwa on Santa

Remember, Santa know who's been naughty...and he has a list.



h/t: Our friend Theo

|

Thursday, December 04, 2008

Schlock Mercenary: Lessons for the noncom








Background: Schlock is a mercenary. He's the green alien. The bald man is a superior officer. The situation is that Schlock has to go on a mission where one wrong shot "dooms them all."

This is a perfect example of what a sergeant does....Educating officers.
Good noncoms, however, except for Marines, do NOT eat their firearms.
Then again, Schlock is the right shade of green.....

Go read the whole comic. Yeah, yeah. I know. Its a lot of reading.....Heck, you're surfing the web anyway. Read it from the beginning.

Labels:

|

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Someone Has to Say It

|

Just Because.....

I've seen this on numerous, nay, countless blogs and finally gave into the temptation....
It's a list of things that one should do....your mileage may vary.
Things I've done are in bold.

1. Started your own blog (if joining this one counts).
2. Slept under the stars.
3. Played in a band.
4. Visited Hawaii.
5. Watched a meteor shower. (Overcast EVERY damn time!)
6. Given more than you can afford to charity.
7. Been to Disneyland. And DisneyWorld.
8. Climbed a mountain.
9. Held a praying mantis.
10. Sang a solo.
11. Bungee jumped.
12. Visited Paris.
13. Watched a lightning storm at sea.
14. Taught yourself an art from scratch.
15. Adopted a child. (Does a stray dog named Doofus count?)
16. Had food poisoning.
17. Walked to the top of the Statue of Liberty.
18. Grown your own vegetables.
19. Seen the Mona Lisa in France.
20. Slept on an overnight train.
21. Had a pillow fight.
22. Hitch hiked.
23. Taken a sick day when you’re not ill.
24. Built a snow fort.
25. Held a lamb. (Petting zoos rock.)
26. Gone skinny dipping.
27. Run a Marathon. (LOL!)
28. Ridden in a gondola in Venice.
29. Seen a total eclipse.
30. Watched a sunrise or sunset.
31. Hit a home run.
32. Been on a cruise. Does a Navy Med Cruise count?
33. Seen Niagara Falls in person.
34. Visited the birthplace of your ancestors.
35. Seen an Amish community.
36. Taught yourself a new language.
37. Had enough money to be truly satisfied.
38. Seen the Leaning Tower of Pisa in person.
39. Gone rock climbing.
40. Seen Michelangelo's David.
41. Sung karaoke.
42. Seen Old Faithful geyser erupt.
43. Bought a stranger a meal at a restaurant.
44. Visited Africa. * Does being offshore within 1 mile of a Tunisian beach count?
45. Walked on a beach by moonlight.
46. Been transported in an ambulance.
47. Had your portrait painted.
48. Gone deep sea fishing.
49. Seen the Sistine Chapel in person.
50. Been to the top of the Eiffel Tower in Paris. ( Been to the bottom of it... Closed before we got there.
51. Gone scuba diving or snorkeling.
52. Kissed in the rain.
53. Played in the mud.
54. Gone to a drive-in theater.
55. Been in a movie.
56. Visited the Great Wall of China.
57. Started a business.
58. Taken a martial arts class.
59. Visited Russia. (Does visiting a Soviet warship count?)
60. Served at a soup kitchen.
61. Sold Girl Scout Cookies.
62. Gone whale watching.
63. Got flowers for no reason.
64. Donated blood, platelets or plasma.
65. Gone sky diving.
66. Visited a Nazi Concentration Camp.
67. Bounced a check. (Not my fault!)
68. Flown in a helicopter.
69. Saved a favorite childhood toy.
70. Visited the Lincoln Memorial.
71. Eaten Caviar.
72. Pieced a quilt.
73. Stood in Times Square.
74. Toured the Everglades.
75. Been fired from a job.
76. Seen the Changing of the Guards in London.
77. Broken a bone.
78. Been on a speeding motorcycle. (Couldn't see any speed limit signs from behind the driver.)
79. Seen the Grand Canyon in person.
80. Published a book.
81. Visited the Vatican.
82. Bought a brand new car.
83. Walked in Jerusalem.
84. Had your picture in the newspaper.
85. Read the entire Bible.
86. Visited the White House.
87. Killed and prepared an animal for eating.
88. Had chickenpox.
89. Saved someone’s life.
90. Sat on a jury.
91. Met someone famous.
92. Joined a book club.
93. Lost a loved one.
94. Had a baby. Hope being the Dad counts....
95. Seen the Alamo in person.
96. Swam in the Great Salt Lake.
97. Been involved in a law suit.
98. Owned a cell phone.
99. Been stung by a bee.
100. Read an entire book in one day.

Also explored Mayan and Aztec ruins, traveled the Panama Canal, saw both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans at the same time in El Salvador.

Anything else I've done.....I was at lunch. That's my story and I'm sticking to it...

Anybody else?

Labels:

|