Wednesday, March 14, 2012

A Little Political Humor Courtesey of The Patriot Post

"President Obama compared himself to Gandhi and Nelson Mandela in the struggle to bring about change. The comparison is flawed. They spent years in jail before taking political power, while politicians from Chicago do it the other way around." --comedian Argus Hamilton

"One of Warren Buffet's companies owes the government $300 million in unpaid taxes. So that's why Buffet doesn't mind higher taxes on the rich: He's not gonna pay 'em anyway." --NewsBusted's Jodi Miller

"The Air Force is pulling nine cargo aircraft from military operations to support President Obama's stepped-up visits to campaign events. Good. Now he can carry his entire ego with him on the trail." --Fred Thompson

"They say gasoline could be $6 a gallon. But the good news is the White House says President Obama is aware of the problem, and will continue to talk about it between fundraisers." --comedian Jay Leno

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Fred Does Video For Hoffman

Take note party line Republicans. The grassroots are running this show, not you. The Republican Party machine is slowly grinding to a halt from all the BS accumulating in the gears, but don't worry, most of us are very adept at cleaning and re-building machinery.

H/T FreeRepublic
Fred Thompson: 'Send Washington A Message' By Voting Hoffman
NY Daily News ^ 10/27/2009 Elizabeth Benjamin

Former US senator, 2008 presidential contender and "Law & Order" star Fred Thompson stars in a new TV ad for NY-23 candidate Doug Hoffman in which he urges voters to "send a message to Washington" by voting for the Conservative nominee.

Thompson, who was among the first national pols to endorse Hoffman, has a history with the New York Conservative Party.

In January 2008, state Conservative Party Chairman Mike Long called Thompson his "favorite candidate" and hinted at an early endorsement. This was a snub to the hometown GOP contender, Rudy Giuliani, which isn't so surprising, since Long and the former mayor have never had a great relationship.

Thompson was the guest of honor at the party's annual fall reception last year, too.

In this ad, which is paid for by Hoffman's campaign as opposed to the Club for Growth or NRCC, Thompson calls the candidate "a principled conservative" (he's an enrolled Republican who decided to run after losing out on the nomination from the 11 local county chairs to Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava).

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...

Labels: , , ,

|

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Follow Up To Other DeDe Scozzafava Post

We have friends in New York right now, lending a hand.

As you may have heard, the race is really heating up in New York's 23rd Congressional District, with the Republican establishment doubling down for Dede Scozzafava, the 'movement conservatives' largely weighing in for Doug Hoffman and the Democrats licking their chops at the thought of taking control of this seat for the first time since the 19th Century. It's a free-for-all, and it's anybody's race at this point.

In this clip, Newt Gingrich makes the case for Dede Scozzafava:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FETumfkPqwQ

In this one, Fred Thompson makes the case for Doug Hoffman:
http://www.fredpac.com/2009/10/clip-of-the-day-102009/

Finally, Bill Owens makes the case for Bill Owens:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPdKYT9zIZ8

I'll have some phone numbers later on to help Doug Hoffman.

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Monday, March 02, 2009

Pajamas TV - The new media gains ground

Here's a chance to catch your favorites from CPAC!

Excellent show at Pajamas TV from CPAC. Here's just some of the people on the show.

You can pick which part of the show you want to watch on their menu.

Bill Whittle - Essayist of Eject, Eject, Eject! and host of the show

Michelle Malkin - Blogger babe, , Web/TV pundit

Deroy Murdock - Conservative columnist

Fred Thompson - Former, well, everything...and now, Talk Radio host!
Listen on the web!

Robert Davi - Actor and Film maker

Alphonzo Rachel - MACHO SAUCE IS AT CPAC!

Glenn Reynolds - Instapundit

Stephen Green - Vodka Pundit

Joe Wurzelbacher - Plumber, journalist,

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

So we have to bailout the Big 3? How's that first bailout working for you?

|

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Car Keys and Learners' Permits

As usual, Senator Thompson nails it:

.....international terrorism; powerful nation states on a quest for hegemony, whether close to home or further afield and with a willingness to squelch freedom anytime the opportunity arises; less stable and no less dangerous countries with nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities; an alliance of democratic nations of questionable resolve and a debate at home over our future role in the world with a political party happy to create the impression of diminished resolve with little concern for the long term damage such an impression may cause.

Under these circumstances the old title “leader of the free world” takes on renewed meaning. He will have to guide the body politic at home toward resolution and in all likelihood engender resolve in a new alliance of democratic nations to deal with this broad array of challenges. In short it will require someone with experience and the courage to put his nation’s long term interest above his own.

I suppose it’s obvious where I’m going with this. This is no time to elect a president whose international experience is limited to speaking to adoring European crowds who want to see the United States retreat from the world … until they require our help in the next crisis that threatens them.

It has been instructive for the country to see the candidates’ reaction to the equivalent of Hillary Clinton’s 3 a.m. phone call.

While he was vacationing in Hawaii, Barack Obama’s advisors scrambled into action and initially came up with the expected liberal bromides which equated the actions of Russia and Georgia and only ratcheted up the rhetoric when they began to actually understand what was happening.

It wasn’t that difficult for John McCain. For him Georgia was another little-known part of the world, whose leaders and history he is familiar with. And long before this Georgian crisis, he’s had the correct read on Russia, just as he’s had the right read on what we needed to do in Iraq.

This crisis half a world away confirms what I’ve been saying for a while: This election cycle, the traffic in the world is very heavy …and dangerous; it’s no time to give a kid with barely a learner’s permit the keys to the car.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Fred needs to fit actions to his words.

Fred is back!

But, I don't care.

I understand that he is friends with John McCain. I understand that he believes, as many do, that we must unite behind the GOP candidate for the good of the country because the Democratic Party candidates are so horrible. His endorsement of John McCain was, admittedly, weak:

"This is no longer about past preferences or differences. It is about what is best for our country and for me that means that Republican should close ranks behind John McCain," Thompson said in a statement reported by the Associated Press.

He did NOT say that McCain was the best candidate of the the race....

That said, having endorsed McCain, the Republican candidate most despised by the GOP, how can he say this(emphasis mine):

"Our nation has some serious issues to work through for today … and for the next generation. Now isn’t the time for conservatives to be looking for a tailored message or a politically expedient route to victory if the end result is going to be the inevitable slide toward the liberalization and secularization of America, and the growth of government and loss of freedom that inevitably ensues. For us conservatives it must be about principles and policies that are grounded in freedom, free markets and the rule of law."

If McCain is not the embodiment of a tailored, expedient politician, then, who is? (Other than the Dems)
If Fred truly believes his own statement, he needs to get busy, get involved with the campaign, and use whatever influence his supposed friendship gives him to attempt to rein in John McCain.

Labels: ,

|

Sunday, January 27, 2008

The Failure of the Conservative Wing

FredHeads around the nation all have their beliefs about why the Thompson campaign failed.

Andrew Ferguson has a very interesting take in the Weekly Standard.

The traditional restraint of old-time presidential candidates wasn't arrogance or sanctimoniousness, the twin accusations that wised-up politicos made against Thompson during the campaign. There was a philosophical component to it too: By not seeming overeager--no matter how eager they were--candidates paid tribute to the democratic idea that political power is best sought, taken on, and used reluctantly. It was also a matter of seemliness, and Thompson, alone among recent candidates, felt its pull. In his stump speech he often mentioned George Washington, once a staple of political rhetoric for his willingness to walk away from the power that was thrust upon him. Today Washington's restraint seems nothing more than an archaism. And by extolling it Thompson sounded merely odd.

"If people really want in their president a super type-A personality," Thompson said at that Iowa town hall meeting, "someone who has gotten up every morning and gone to bed every night thinking for years about how they could achieve the presidency of the United States, someone who could look you straight in the eye and say they enjoy every minute of campaigning--I ain't that guy."

The man or woman who seeks out such a life and enjoys its discomforts is not normal. Not crazy necessarily, but not normal, and probably, when the chips are down, not to be trusted, especially when the purpose of it all is to acquire power over other people (also called, in the delicate language of contemporary politics, "public service" or "getting things done on behalf of the American people"). The case is made, in defense of the contemporary campaign, that this is an efficient if unlovely way to choose leaders: It winnows out those who lack the stamina and discipline necessary to lead a rich, large, powerful, and complicated country. By this argument, Thompson failed because he deserved to.

But the opposite case is easier to make--that the modern campaign excludes anyone who lacks the narcissism, cold-bloodedness, and unreflective nature that the process requires and rewards. In his memoir -Greenspan remarks that of the seven presidents he has known well, the only one who was "close to normal" was Jerry Ford. And, as Greenspan points out, Ford was never elected.

Fred Thompson probably feels terrible at the moment, but he should be honored to be in Ford's company.




Labels: , ,

|

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Thompson Strategy

If I was in charge....how many times have you said that?

Well, If I was in charge of Thompson's campaign,

First, I would fire whoever is in charge of the PR and the volunteer handling. They need a clear chain of command.

Two, I would charge after Huckabee. He is an easy target and Thompson is already carving away some of Huckabee's conservatives.

Three, McCain. Bring up his record. That's all you have to do. Get him mad. He'll do the rest.

Four, Piss off the media. Make them mention him in any way, shape, or form. Thompson is the invisible man. They don't support him, so use them in any way you can.

Five, get Thompson speaking about the issues that get the media's attention. Don't stroll through a gun show. Bring a frickin rifle to the speech! If he's legally allowed to carry, put one on his hip. Play up to his reputation.

Six, STOP BEING SO DAMNED POLITE. ATTACK DAMMIT!

Too little, maybe too late. Since the republicans have decided to support liberals, what's he got to lose?

Labels: , , ,

|

What if.....you'll be asking that in 2009

UPDATE: FRED THOMPSON TIED FOR 3RD IN SOUTH CAROLINA.

With Romney? Huckabee, that fraud and McCain, that fascist liberal, are winning? WTF?!
How is McCain or Huckacarter going to be any different from Clinton and Obama other than the GWOT?

Romney SKIPPED SOUTH CAROLINA! I repeat, WTF?
All you "republicans" wanted a "conservative." Well you got two. Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. Hunter has resigned. Thompson might.

The other candidates are winning because you are voting for them. Yes, Fred could have run a more "exciting" race, but, you knew that he wouldn't pander to the crowd when he started. If you wanted a conservative, why do you have to be convinced? Just vote for the CONSERVATIVE. Who cares about the "campaign?"

The Reagan Revolution is dead. Long live the liberals. When you get a liberal president, don't blame the Fred Heads.

Fred Thompson misjudged the electorate. He listened to the GOP and thought that there was support for him. His qualities match EVERY SINGLE THING we've asked for in the last 20 years. And you turned it down. Because you couldn't get excited....

Small government? Federalism? Repeal McCain-Feingold? Immigration? 2nd Amendment?
Abortion? Non-activist judges? AND fighting the GWOT?

What if......

Too late now. Should've voted for the conservative when you had the chance.

Labels: , ,

|

Real conservatives vote for Fred Thompson. Don't blame us if a liberal gets elected.

Apparently,voters don't read blogs. This (the Internet) appears to be nothing more than an echo chamber. I read blogs from all across the country.

95% of the bloggers and/or commenters are Fred fans. I think we are the only ones voting for him because his numbers SUCK! The populace are uniformed boobs apparently.

Conservatives have cried for a non-pandering, principled, issue- oriented candidate for decades.
NOW they support liberals?! Conservatives voting for McCain? Huckabee is seen as a conservative because he’s evangelical? So was Carter! When Romney! is the best of a bad deal on second choices AND comes out second on the conservative meter, things are bad. Romney may be a business man, but, he’s no conservative. If any of the above get primary votes, its because these “conservatives” are either hypocrites or lazy.

What happened to all of the “conservatives” that applauded Fred’s entry into the race? Oh, it didn’t happen when
THEY wanted it.

Well, now is the time. Conservatives need to step up.


Labels: , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

The Conservative Speech

From Kim du Toit, a speech for the conservative candidate. And we all know who that is....

Tell me if you agree that THIS speech would win the hearts and minds of the conservatives out there. Now if we can only get Fred Thompson to give it.

My fellow Americans:

I know that after the Iowa polls, everyone was talking about ‘change’ as though this was some kind of magic word which, at a single stroke, will cure us as a nation of all our ills.

Well, let me outline the specific areas where I would like to see this ‘change’ , and let me tell you how I’ll make those changes happen.

1. Low taxes. There seems to be a vague drifting of sentiment towards allowing a tax increase to happen. When I am elected President, I will push for lower, and still lower taxes for the hard-working Americans on whose backs this bloated government rests. I should point out that had any of the Founding Fathers foreseen a tax system which confiscates nearly one third of a man’s hard-earned wages, they might have given up at the start. So let me take that one step further: not only will I push for lower taxes, but I will veto each and every bill which comes my desk which contains even the slightest hint of a tax increase. That is my solemn promise to you.

2. Health care. Everyone, Republicans included, believes that we are entitled to health care in this country. What they really mean is that everyone should be able to afford health care insurance—and we should. Perhaps if the government took less money away from people in the first place, people would be able to pay for health insurance. We all know that a nationalized health care system is doomed to fail, because that’s happening in every country which has created it. It doesn’t matter whether it’s called a National Health Service or a single-payer system, or universal health care; what it really is, is Government giving out medical treatment—and, in case anyone hasn’t been reading the news from overseas, when Government finds out that it can no longer afford to give out medical treatment to everyone who asks for it, Government then turns around and says, “You can have it, but you’ll have to wait in line” or even worse, “You can’t have it at all, because you belong to a group which we have decided is not worthy to get it.” This has happened, I repeat, in every country where socialized medicine is practiced, and it would be an act of supreme folly to imagine that it would turn out any differently in our country. And speaking of people unworthy to get free medical treatment, let me move to my next point.

3. Illegal immigration. I will work to reduce federal funding to any state which offers free health care, or free education, to illegal immigrants and their children. I am sick of people crying about the children of illegal immigrants. Let me make myself perfectly clear about this: if a couple gets arrested for robbing a convenience store to feed their family, we do not let them off a prison sentence because their children will lose their parents. It’s a crying shame that children should have to suffer as a result of their parents’ actions, but it is ultimately their parents who caused their woes, by breaking the law. One last thing: A lot of people have talked about how it would be impossible to deport twelve million illegal immigrants. That’s a red herring, because we don’t have to deport twelve million immigrants. What we can do is deport a million a year—and we can certainly do that— while at the same time shoring up our immigration- and border controls to ensure that having been deported, these criminals find it increasingly more difficult to re-cross the border and break the law again. Once illegal immigrants realize that we are serious about expelling them from this country, their desire to try will again be reduced. This has happened in the past, and I will work to make sure that it happens again.

4. The size of government. The federal government of this country has become too large, too powerful, and too big for its own britches. It has been able to get this way because it collects too much of our money in taxes, and because people have become accustomed to rely on the government to provide for their comfort. Well, as we look around the world today and over the past fifty or so years, the biggest lesson we can learn is that the bigger the government and the more intrusive it is on the business of its citizens, the less successful the country will be, and the more unhappy its citizens. I spoke earlier of my desire to lower our taxes; well, let me spell it out for you. My goal will be to lower the top income tax rate to 20%—that’s right, twenty percent. There are people who will say that the government cannot survive by taking only one out of every five dollars we earn. Allow me to say two things about that. The first is that every single American knows how to balance what we want, with what we can afford. We would like to buy jewelery, but we know we can’t afford it. Do we therefore buy the diamond necklace anyway, and stop buying groceries for our children? No, we do not: we make do with less—but that’s not the way the federal government works. Perhaps it’s time for the Federal government to start making the same difficult choices that ordinary Americans are forced to make every day—in no small part because the government takes away too much of our money to begin with. The second thing I have to say is that if some government departments find themselves short of money and have to stop working because of no funding, that is one of my goals, too. Which leads me to my fifth point.

5. Constitutional principles. When our Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they were extremely careful to limit the power of the Federal government by saying that the government could only do a few specific activities, and no more. Somehow, those few specific activities have grown to encompass government programs that the Founders would never have imagined, in their wildest and most imprudent dreams. So I will work first to curb and then end those expensive and unsustainable programs, to the fullest power with which the Constitution grants the President. It has been said that one of the reasons that the Constitution was so well written was because the authors had the glowering presence of George Washington looking over their shoulders. Let me tell you, I feel that same presence today—and every President should feel that same presence, and govern accordingly.

6. National security. I spoke earlier of government departments running out of money to function, and of things the Federal government may or may not do. Let me remind everyone of one thing: one of the primary functions of the federal government, not only specified but directed by the Constitution, is to provide for the security of our nation. So do not think that I will allow our Armed Forces to be denied the proper funding to function. Far from it. Our opponents talk about our overwhelming military strength in the world as though it is a bad thing. When they say that, what they are saying is that we, the American people, cannot be trusted to manage that responsibility. Allow me to differ. When a tsunami strikes Southeast Asia, the most welcome sight is not a United Nations fact-finding mission, it is a U.S. Marine Corps helicopter. When one tribe is busy slaughtering another in some forgotten part of the world, the tribesmen would prefer to see American soldiers, rather than Bob Geldof. We are not a totalitarian country; we are not Hitler or Stalin, trying to conquer the world. We are Americans, trying to ensure that this fragile flame of freedom does not flicker and go out. And let me remind everyone that our enemies, especially the Islamic terrorists and the governments which support them, are blowing as hard as they can. My promise to you is that they will never succeed, even slightly, under my watch. We are going to listen to their phone calls and read their emails as they plan to blow up our cities or kill our soldiers; we are going to interrupt their flow of funding, no matter what the source may be. And we are going to pursue them to the ends of the Earth and kill them for the murderers and tyrants that they are, just as we have pursued and punished Nazi killers, and still do to this day.

In closing, let me say this to you all: our Founding Fathers were rightfully afraid of tyrannical governments, both those from outside our borders and those which may spring from our own population. This is why they limited the power of government, and provided for Americans to change matters when they wanted to, whether through the soap box, the mail box, the ballot box, and, in the final extreme and with extreme reluctance, the cartridge box, just as those few brave souls did at Concord and Lexington, Massachusetts.

Well, I speak to you now as a candidate for change—the best change, the change which our Constitution demands, and a change back to our Constitution’s original intent: less government in your lives and affairs; lower taxes; the freedom to bear arms, and all the other freedoms as enumerated in our Bill of Rights, which is still the greatest social and political document ever written.

I will work tirelessly towards that end, because if I do not, I will have betrayed the trust which our Founding Fathers and you, the American people, will have bestowed upon me.

Thank you, and good night.

Labels: ,

|

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Senator Thompson sets the story straight

Two weeks ago, I wrote about how the idea that conservative voters were not backing FDT because "they were waiting to be excited by him" was so much crap. I found the reality repugnant that conservatives were buying into the media misrepresentations because he wasn't matching their idea of a campaign, even though those "conservatives" professed to want a conservative candidate. WELL, HERE YOU GO. IF YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE VOTER THAT DOES NOT WANT A CANDIDATE THAT WANTS TO RUN EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE, THAT BELIEVES THAT PRESIDENTS ARE NOT THE ANSWER TO LIFE'S EVERY PROBLEM, HERE IS YOUR CANDIDATE. IF YOU ARE STILL WAITING TO GET EXCITED....GO SURF THE INTERNET. YOU'LL FIND SOMETHING.

Getting the Story Straight

By Fred Thompson

Every once in a while I am more thankful than ever for today’s technology which allows me to talk to you directly instead of having to go through the filter of the main stream media.

Some of them are intent on making the outcome of the campaign dependent upon their pre-conceived notions. Every once in a while their incomplete and slanted coverage makes this clear.

Today I had this story written about me regarding what I said at a Town Hall event in Burlington, Iowa by a reporter who wasn’t even at the event. Incidentally, I declined to be interviewed by this particular reporter yesterday for reasons which will soon be apparent.

In referring to me, she reported “he doesn’t like modern campaigning, isn’t interested in running for President, and will not be devastated” if he doesn’t win.

Below is a transcript of what I actually said in response to a question by a local Burlington resident which was the basis of the reporter’s story.

It is clear that there are those in the media who will exact a high price for candor and from those whom they consider to be insufficiently ambitious. But it is with increasing amazement that we see that those who are willing to slant or leave out important parts of a story to make their point.

If a candidate succumbs to this he will be reduced to nothing more than a sound bite machine.

As for me I am going to continue to say exactly what is in my heart and is on my mind and give straight and honest answers to those who ask straight and honest questions.

Incidentally, the audience in Burlington broke into applause in the middle of my answer. The reporter wouldn’t know that because she wasn’t even there.

Q: (Courtesy ABC News) My only problem with you and why I haven’t thrown all my support behind you is that I don’t know if you have the desire to be President. If I caucus for you next week, are you still going to be there two months from now?

That is a very good question, not because it’s difficult to answer, but I’m gonna answer it in a little different way than what you might expect.

In the first place, I got into the race about the time people normally get into get into it. The fact of the matter is people get into it a lot earlier than they used to. For some of them, they were juniors in high school.

The first place, I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t. I wouldn’t be doing this. I grew up in very modest circumstances. I left government and I and my family have made sacrifices to be sitting here today. I haven’t had any income for a long time because I figured to be clean, you’ve got to cut everything off. I was doing speaking engagements and I had a contract to do a tv show. I had a contract with abc radio…and so forth. A man would have to be a total fool to do all those things and to be leaving his family which is not a joyful thing if he didn’’t want to do it.

I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have.

When this talk first originated from people around the country both directly and through polls, liked the idea of me stepping up and of course, you always look better form a distance.

But most of those people are still there. I approached it from the standpoint of a deal. A kind of a marriage. If one side of a marriage really has to be talked into the marriage, it probably ain’t going to be a good deal. But if you mutually decide it’s going to be a good thing. In this case, if you think this is a good thing for the country, then we have an opportunity to do some wonderful things together.

I’m offering myself up. I’m saying that I have the background, the capability and concern to do this and do it for the right reasons. I’m not particularly interested in running for president, but I think I’d make a good president.

Nowadays, the process has become much more important than it used to be.

I don’t know that they ever asked George Washington a question like this. I don’t know that they ever asked Dwight D. Eisenhower a question like this. But nowadays, it’s all about fire in the belly. I’m not sure in the world we live in today it’s a good thing if a president has too much fire in the belly. I approach life differently than a lot of people. People, I guess, wonder how I’ve been as successful as I’ve been in everything that I’ve done. I won two races in TN by 20 point margins in a state that bill Clinton carried twice. I’ve never had an acting lesson. I guess that’s obvious by people who’ve watched me…

When I did it, I did it. Wasn’t just a lark. Anything that’s worth doing is worth doing well. But I’ve always been a little more laid back than most. I’m only consumed by very, very few things. Politics is not one of them. The welfare of our country and our kids and grandkids is one of them.

If people really want in their president super type-a personality, someone who has gotten up every morning and gone to bed every night and been thinking about for years how they win the presidency of the united states, someone who can look you straight in the eye and say they enjoy every minute of campaigning, I ain’t that guy. So I hope I’ve discussed that and didn’t talk you out of anything. I honestly want – I can’t imagine a worse set of circumstances [than] achieving the Presidency of the United States under false pretenses. I go out of my way to be myself... (continues at update)


via REDSTATE

Update: more from this speech at NRO: (emphasis mine)

because I don't want anybody to think they're getting something they're not getting. I'm not consumed by this process, I'm not consumed with the notion of being president. I'm simply saying I'm willing to do what's necessary to achieve it if I'm in sync with the people. And if the people want me, or somebody like me, I will do what I've always done with everything else in my life. I will take it on and do a good job. You'll have the disadvantage of having someone who probably can't jump up and click their heels three times, but will tell you the truth. And you'll know where the president stands at all times."

Labels: , ,

|

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Christmas Holiday Message from Mr. Thompson

This is nice. No politics. Just what's important. Merry Christmas.

Labels: , , ,

|

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Tancredo drops out. Loses mind in process......

Rep. Tancredo finally accepted reality and dropped out of the race. I'm sorry to see him go, as he brought important issues to the forefront. But WTF? He endorsed ROMNEY? What was he thinking? I thought that Tancredo would endorse a fellow conservative. Politics makes strange bedfellows......

Hopefully this will turn into more support for Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Fred wants you to buy guns.

I don’t know if this is true. Probably isn’t. But this sounds like it could be Fred. Gotta love Scrappleface.

Republican Presidential candidate Fred Thompson today, upon hearing that rival Ron Paul’s supporters had raised $6 million in 24 hours to commemorate the Boston Tea Party, called on his supporters to match that figure in gun purchases before Christmas to mark George Washington’s victory at the Battle of Trenton.

“I’m tired of running around the country raising money that I just have to hand over to the same mainstream media companies that ignore my campaign,” said the former senator from Tennessee. “We’ve done enough this year to support the so-called free press of the first amendment. Let’s give a boost to our friends who make it possible for us to exercise our second amendment right to keep and bear arms.”

Labels: , , ,

|

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Fred Thompson: Kill, Protect, Punch

Kill the terrorists. Protect the borders. Punch the hippies.

Any blogger supporting Fred HAS to put this video on.

via RightWingNews and IMAO.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Just Sayin'......Fred Facts

Chuck Norris wears Fred Thompson pajamas.......

Fred Thompson not only doesn't add cream or sugar to his coffee, he doesn't add water.
Fred Thompson kills at least one terrorist every day after his first cup of coffee. You don't want to be the terrorist he kills before he gets his first cup of coffee.
Fred Thompson's preferred way to kill a bill in the Senate is the shotgun.

See more fun Fred Facts at IMAO.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Fred does not pander

The good fellows over at Society for Independent Thinking put out a good description of Fred Thompson and why he's not getting any press:

And, of course, there’s the AP dog-and-pony show, wherein they ask the candidates stupid yearbook questions, instead of dealing with substance. Thompson’s responses, while certainly not pleasing to the AP (that is, they wouldn’t have been had the AP gotten the joke) were sure-fire crowd-pleasers to those of us who understood where Thompson was coming from:
What’s your favorite joke? Presidential debates.
What’s your favorite keepsake? Trophy wife.
What’s your favorite nickname? Mr. President.
And, of course, there’s my new favorite poke in the eye: What do you like to do on a ‘lazy day’? Campaigning.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Friday, December 14, 2007

"I'm waiting for Thompson to get me excited...." BULLS#&T!

I am so sick and tired of supposedly conservative voters saying in some form or another: " I want to vote for Thompson, but, I'm waiting for HIM to get me excited....He just hasn't excited me.....I'm waiting for him to get exciting...."

What the hell is this? A freaking porno? This is the PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!

IF YOU HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT THE ISSUES WITH EACH CANDIDATE BY NOW, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU WAITING FOR?!

Its not a candidates job to "excite" you. His job is to present his response to the issues of the day. Its your job to make a LOGICAL, NON-EMOTIONAL choice, to the best of your ability. Pick a candidate for his character, his skill in diplomacy, his knowledge of the issues that are important to you, etc....But don't wait FOR THE CANDIDATE to excite you. If you wait that long, the democrats will win. THEY PICK THEIR CANDIDATES BY EMOTIONAL APPEAL. Do you want to be like a democrat? I like Fred Thompson. I like Duncan Hunter. Between the two, I like Fred's presentation of the issues and his responses to the campaign situations the best. If you do not support the candidate that you like best, but pick the most "electable" because they seem to be more exciting or have more momentum, well, GIVE YOUR CANDIDATE MOMENTUM! SUPPORT HIM! But stop with all this crap about excitability being your criteria. It makes you look stupid.

Or worse, like a democrat.

Labels: , , ,

|