Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Warrior Legacy Foundation Southeast Region and Military Ballots












About 30 dedicated Virginia patriots showed up tonight to tell the VA State Board of Elections we don't appreciate the dissing of Warriors.

Without knowing it, these hearty souls were upholding the first tenet of Warrior Legacy Foundation:
Defend the Defenders

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

Monday, October 19, 2009

Get Rid of Nancy Rodrigues

Time for an anti-Tim Kaine Surge!

Don't wait til after we've won...start the clean-up now.

We need every Virginia Delegate and Senator on this ASAP!!!

Write or call and DEMAND that Timmy fire Nancy Rodrigues, who he appointed as Secretary of the State Board of Elections in 2007.

She intentionally disenfranchised the military overseas in the 2008 election, stating that there was no 'deadline' to mail those ballots. The judge ruled that she was out of line. She's a Democrat partisan operative overseeing our electoral process.

She's also the one who had the public hissy fit about not enough ballots in Chesterfield last year.

This deliberate action to exclude the military from voting is so reprehensible I'm at a loss for words. Call! Write! Demand accountability and her removal PRIOR to Nov. 3rd!

Should we mount a protest against her? I'm game.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Dirty Deeds, Dirt Cheap

Vouchers do not take away from public education funding. The VA Lottery brags about putting 4 billion, yes, thats a 4 with 9 zeros behind it, into the Literary Fund.
Where is that money?

All candidates for public office have a decision to make this year and next year.
Republican candidates for office must decide if they are Republican politicians, or conservative Americans who made a choice to serve the community. We will be watching.

Deeds Accumulates a Record 9 Editorials Commenting on His Lack of Vision and False Advertising

ARLINGTON - Over the last month, the Deeds campaign has accumulated a total of nine editorials from papers across the state commenting on both Creigh Deeds' lack of vision and false campaign ads. The popular topic among editorial boards has earned the Deeds campaign and its advertising such sterling appellations as "dishonest," "outright lie," "false," "being wrong by being nothing," "dirtiest campaign," "below-the-belt," "crossing the line" and "deceptive."

Below is a rundown of all the editorials and highlights from each:

"One of the pernicious successes of right-wing showmen is to convince the more weak-minded of their fans to scorn their local newspapers--appendages, allegedly, of the cursed Mainstream Media (MSM), which hates Republicans, conservatives, and all things true-blue American. But this characterization will not withstand the Creigh Deeds for Governor campaign, which has united the commonwealth's newspapers in expressions of distaste."
Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star, October 6, 2009, "Monsieur Mud"

"There you have it then, the Deeds formula for governing, to avoid being wrong by being nothing, to draw lines in the air. He is the political equivalent of the Sandman of 'Spider-man' movie fame. Attempt to squeeze him for definition on an issue and he seeps through the fingers. He takes form only while swinging away at the opposition, but look upon Deeds himself and one sees only the sand shifting."
Waynesboro News Virginian, October 6, 2009, "A candidate absent Form"

"Instead of showing Virginians his plan for how he'll improve transportation and education and ease unemployment without taxing them all into the poorhouse, Deeds has been running one of the dirtiest campaigns in recent memory. There's a reason he keeps muddying the campaign waters. He doesn't want voters to notice the empty suit behind his scurrilous attacks on McDonnell."
Washington Examiner, October 4, 2009, "Dirty Deeds muddies campaign waters"

"It is a rare politician who unites newspaper editorial boards across the political spectrum and across the state of Virginia. Democratic gubernatorial candidate R. Creigh Deeds has done just that: Throughout the state, observers agree that he is running a flatly dishonest advertising campaign that discredits his own claim to be worthy of the office. .... Those are harsh words, but Mr. Deeds deserves every one." The Washington Times, September 30, 2009, "Dirty Deeds"

"His (Deeds) television ads have been below-the-belt and beyond-the-pale attacks. The most egregious was the spot entitled "$300 Million," which has been on a constant loop in Central and Southwest Virginia. The ad outright blames McDonnell for the increase in electricity bills that Appalachian Power Co. customers have seen in recent months, a blatant lie and distortion."
Lynchburg News & Advance, September 27, 2009, "Governor's Race Devoid of Issues, Filled With Fibs"

"The Democratic nominee appears to believe his only hope for victory lies in sliming Republican Bob McDonnell. .......But [McDonnell] has built a record of pragmatic accomplishment, both in the House of Delegates and as attorney general. He has earned a reputation as being willing and able to work across the aisle to solve problems.All politicians attempt to draw caricatures of their opponents. But Deeds is crossing the line. His overwhelmingly negative campaign leaves an especially sour taste given the lack of specifics in his own platform. We are, for instance, dumbfounded by his refusal to make a clear stand on the intersection between taxes and transportation. Apparently, his leadership on the issue would involve signing whatever the General Assembly sends his way. If it means higher taxes, well, that's apparently no problem at all. And we are worried about Deeds' reluctance to take the stage with McDonnell. A governor must be willing to face his constituents and the political opposition. Why is Creigh Deeds so afraid?"
The Richmond Times-Dispatch, September 24, 2009, "Creigh Deeds: Fear and Loathing"

"But 'effective' need not, and should not, be confused with 'credible' or 'believable.' Save for his overriding ambition, Mr. Deeds appears to be little more than the political manifestation of Gertrude Stein's Oakland: There is no there there. Especially when it comes to policy formulations on roads, jobs and the economy that amount to scarcely more than a wink, a nod and an entreaty to 'trust me.'"
The Daily News Record, September 24, 2009, "Change and Evolve"

"The ad in question, which has been shown in our part of the state, outright blames McDonnell, then the state's attorney general, for Appalachian Power Co.'s recent series of rate hikes. It's an outright lie, and the good senator and his campaign operatives know it. APCo, under the law (a law Deeds voted for as a state senator) is indeed entitled to collect certain costs and expenses from its customers. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, but to suggest, as he does in the ad, that there was a dark cabal between the GOP, McDonnell and Big Power (to coin a phrase) is disengenous, at best."
Lynchburg News and Advance, September 20, 2009,"Voters Deserve Details, Specifics From Hopefuls"

"Before customers who have choked on high electric bills break out their pitchforks and go after McDonnell, they should know that Deeds' ad is not honest." ".....to pretend that McDonnell did anything but represent consumers and uphold the law is deceptive. Deeds should be ashamed."
The Roanoke Times, September 18, 2009, "McDonnell Didn't Decide Rates"

"The ads raise questions about whether Deeds even wants to be part of a solution. The Democrat has said he will work to build support for a transportation plan if he's elected governor. He's been unwilling to say how he'd pay for road improvements, but Deeds did commit to signing a package that includes taxes as long as it has bipartisan support. This commercial .....should lead many voters to question whether Deeds has any intention of making the hard decisions necessary to undo a generation of fiscal mismanagement in Richmond. Deeds has spent the summer telling voters why they shouldn't vote for McDonnell, but precious little time explaining why they should vote for him. Deeds has spent a month trying to scare Virginians about McDonnell's past as a cultural conservative, but too little explaining his own vision for Virginia's future..... .....Hampton Roads desperately needs a leader with the vision to recognize the region's most pressing needs and the courage to solve them. Deeds has suggested that he wants to be that leader, but right now he looks like just another politician who cares more about winning than about solutions."
The Virginian-Pilot, September 16, 2009, "Deeds has problem on transportation"

"More to the point, Deeds apparently hasn't noticed the yawning void in the middle of his campaign where vision and ideas ought to be. First, he stammers about abortion, an issue that surely will not win him an election. Then he rolls out a presidential testimonial. What of how the commonwealth might be run? What of transportation? What of job creation? .... .....One might disagree with McDonnell on how he expects to go about governing, but he has provided detailed plans, which is ordinarily just the sort of thing Democrats do, ad infinitum.... .....We know the president likes Deeds. Surprise. But we don't know what Deeds might do if he catches the office he seeks. Hearing nothing from him gives the impression that Deeds is a man without a plan. It is not an image that appeals."
The Waynesboro News-Virginian, August 28, 2009, "Deeds: Man without plan"

Labels: , , ,

|

Monday, October 05, 2009

Last Day To Register To Vote

|

Monday, January 07, 2008

Is this the reason why Virginia is turning blue?

Why is the GOP Losing Virginia? Blame the Republican Party of Virginia: A Case Study in Idiocy

"Here's a case study on why the GOP is failing in Virginia. It has taken me some time to compile this. I wanted to talk to representatives of the various candidates. They confirm what I report below. Likewise, I talked to a Democrat who confirms that the Democratic Party of Virginia did not stoop to the level of jackassery that the Republican Party of Virginia did."

"......Contrast that with the Republican Party of Virginia (go below the fold):"

Check the above out at Redstate and see if you agree.

Labels: ,

|

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Some truths about Virginia

|

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Libertarians challenge the GOP

Conservatives profess to want limited government, to want citizen-politicians. Politicians that hold office for decades do not seem to represent that ideal. So, that said, competition in the field of politics is a good thing.

Apparently, a large percentage of voters in Henrico county appear to think this too. Challengers were consistently successful in reaching double digits in vote percentages. One such challenger, Mr. George Marchenko, of the the Libertarian party, fought a good fight. In an overwhelmingly Republican district, he garnered 21.61 percent of the votes, including over 32 percent in one precinct. This tells me two things. That the Libertarian party, though not as recognizable as the Democratic party in challenging the GOP, is no longer seen as a non-viable party at the local level. And that many voters are tired of career politicians holding office for years at at time.

Principles of small government are popular with conservative voters. And lately, incumbent Republicans are not exhibiting faithfulness to that ideal. The GOP is in danger of having to fight a two front war. One versus the socialism of the Democrats and another against the "small government" principles of the Libertarian party. If the GOP wishes to succeed in the future, it will have to return to the conservative principles of low taxes and minimal government. Like minded Libertarians could use this a jump start into office, if they run as Republicans. Remember, numbers count.

It doesn't matter to which party the GOP loses seats, the GOP will still lose.
This is a win-win situation for both parties. Remember, if a libertarian candidate runs as a Republican, that candidate will still be standing on his libertarian principles. The principles on which you run and govern do not change. If you change the label on a book, the plot inside stays the same.

Mr. Marchenko was able to take 2,332 votes away from his Republican opponent, even though his opponent was a popular, long time supervisor with support from the general Republican organization. 2,332 votes out of 10,787.

I wonder what would happen if he ran in the primary as a Republican?

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Monday, September 17, 2007

Why Tom Davis should NEVER be the Senator from Virginia

D.C. Voting Rights

It's time for the Senate to debate the bill on the floor.

Monday, September 17, 2007; Page A18

SUPPORTERS OF D.C. voting rights have to get 60 votes to advance the bill to the Senate floor for debate and a vote. This cloture motion is technical, but how the senators vote is entirely about principle. It is simply not right that U.S. citizens who live in the nation's capital are denied basic representation in their government. That a procedural gambit would be used to prevent a redressing of this wrong is inexcusable.

That the bill was fathered by a Republican member of Congress from Virginia -- Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, who is horrified by the 200-year injustice of D.C. disenfranchisement -- further burnishes its credentials.

Nuff said?

ITS NOT A STATE! If they are concerned about "taxation without representation," give them a perk. No federal income tax. If they would rather vote, add the citizens of DC to the rolls in Maryland. Gilmore or Cantor!

h/t From On High

Labels:

|