Saturday, February 06, 2010

Osama As Enviro-Nazi?

An administration run by czars and hippies sworn to Marxism
Welcome to the Osama-Obama Generation

An administration run by czars and hippies sworn to Marxism is capable of most anything as long as it is allowed to operate behind the scenes.

Just one day before the Underwear Bomber emerged as a “national security victory” and a “political vindication for President Obama”, Dennis C. Blair, Obama’s director
of national intelligence put us on notice that Al Qaeda and its affiliates may attempt a large-scale attack on America before July.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Al Qaeda is “certain” to try an attack soon.
What took them so long? The authorities that is, not the terrorists.

The terrorists, building their very own camps for target practice on American soil, have been right under the authorities’ noses all along, in fact they were there even before 9/11.

Without intervention of any kind, terrorists have been actively recruiting for new members on the Internet and among prison populations.

When former President George W. Bush, (George W, The Hated) tried to deal with terrorists, he was slammed with accusations of water boarding and other “cruelties”.

Now they get their Miranda rights read to them, the right to remain silent, and the prospect of show trials in major American cities with the same kind of publicity potential as an O.J. Simpson. The Johnny Cochrans and Marcia Clarks are waiting in the wings.

The story being spun by the new Marxist regime in the White House is that foiled terrorist attacks, nine years in the making, are being stopped by Obama within the first year of his presidency.

According to the spin, all dufus terrorists start to sing like proverbial canaries. Diplomacy is so much better than waterboarding, right?

Even to the present day, a politically correct media and authorities do not name perps. Passengers on airflights who witness “dry runs” are instructed to stay Mum.
It should be a new more terrifying kind of terrorism now that Obama and Osama are singing from the same page of the hymnal and are on the same wave length on UN-inspired Marxist tactics like Global Warming is going to kill you!

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Heritage Morning Bell - Does Zero Realize We Are At War?

Does Obama Realize We Are at War Yet?
Refusing to interrupt his Hawaiian golf vacation for almost three full days after the Flight 253 attack, President Barack Obama finally emerged on December 28th to assure the American people that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was “an isolated extremist” and that he had already “been charged with attempting to destroy an aircraft.” Continuing to treat the incident like a common law enforcement problem Obama referred to Abdulmutallab as the “suspect” five times and promised he would “not rest until we find all who were involved and hold them accountable.”

Perhaps Obama should have stayed on the links for another 24 hours, because by yesterday it had become exceedingly clear that Abdulmutallab was in no conceivable way “isolated” and was instead very much part of al Qaeda’s larger war on the United States. Here’s what we know so far:

  • According to CBS News, as early as August of 2009 the Central Intelligence Agency was picking up information on a person of interest dubbed “The Nigerian,” suspected of meeting with “terrorist elements” in Yemen.
  • According to the Wall Street Journal, the father of Mr. Abdulmutallab warned the CIA of his son’s likely radicalization at the U.S. embassy in Abuja, Nigeria. That led to a broader gathering of agencies the next day, including the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the State Department, in which the information was shared.
  • According to CNN, information on Abdulmutallab, including his passport number and possible connection to extremists, had been sent to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, but it sat there for five weeks and was not disseminated.
  • Also according to the Wall Street Journal, the National Security Agency who had been monitoring former Guantanamo detainees in Yemen had communications intercepts suggesting a Nigerian was being prepped for a terror strike by al Qaeda operatives in that country.
  • And the Washington Post reports that not only did the British government reject an Abdulmutallab visa application this May, but that British Home Secretary Alan Johnson said that U.S. officials should have been told about the rejection and that he believes they were.

Faced with this preponderance of evidence that Abdulmutallab did not act alone President Obama finally admitted yesterday that “a systemic failure has occurred. And I consider that totally unacceptable.” It may have taken Obama four full days to reach this conclusion, after both White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano spent all of Sunday trying to convince the American people that “the system worked”, but his belated acknowledgment of the seriousness of the situation is welcome.Also belatedly welcome is the acknowledgment that al Qaeda is a major force in Yemen that must be dealt with carefully.

The Washington Post describes al Qaeda in Yemen as a ”major new threat to the United States,” but there is nothing new about it. In fact, al-Qaeda’s first terrorist attack against Americans came in Yemen, the ancestral homeland of Osama bin Laden’s father, who had migrated to neighboring Saudi Arabia before the birth of the al-Qaeda leader.

In December 1992, bin Laden’s followers bombed a hotel in Yemen that was used by U.S. military personnel involved in supporting the humanitarian food relief flights to Somalia. And in October 2000, seventeen American sailors on board the USS Cole, were killed in an al-Qaeda bombing in the harbor of Aden, Yemen’s main port.

The Obama administration must stop thinking of al Qaeda and Abdulmutallab as mere criminals. Obama’s blindness to Abdulmutallab’s al Qaeda connections and his insistence on calling him a “suspect” in the “alleged” bombing is the same mindset dictating Obama’s decision to send Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other terrorists to New York for a civilian trial in federal court. Hopefully this incident will prod Obama into revisiting that historically bad decision.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Obama Is A Puppet and a Coward

From the desk of the always to the point Paul Hollrah:

July 20, 2007 – The Obama campaign launched a campaign to capture the conservative Christian vote. The campaign is called the “Joshua Generation Project,” named after Moses’ successor who led the Israelites into Canaan after they had wandered in the Sinai for forty years.
CBN’s David Brody has resurrected the substance of a 2004 You Tube speech by Obama in which he said, “Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.”

Obama criticized the “Christian Right” for hijacking religion and using it to divide the nation. He said, “Somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart. It got hijacked. Part of it is because of the so-called leaders of the Christian Right, who’ve been all too eager to exploit what divides us.”

In spite of what Obama might think, America IS a Christian nation. It was founded by Christians, it was populated by Christians, and it has been governed from the beginning by Christian values. The Founding Fathers were concerned that the United States not become a theocracy so they added language to our Constitution prohibiting Congress from establishing an official state religion, but that was in no way a denial of our Christian roots.

If we are a “Muslim nation,” as Obama suggests, then how should Christians react to the notion that, in matters of marriage, the Prophet Muhammad is the model that Muslims follow. Muslims claim that Muhammad took a girl named 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6, but he didn’t start having sex with her until she was 9. Obama might want to explain to us exactly how we can square that idea with Christian values.

He might also want to reread some of the sermons he heard during the nearly twenty years he sat in the pews of the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, and then explain to us how his and Rev Wright’s brand of “G_ _ damn America” Christianity brings us together.

June 13, 2008 – Obama rejected John McCain’s proposal for 10 joint town hall meetings, offering instead to have just one on July 4.

The Obama campaign said that their candidate offered to meet McCain in five joint appearances between now and November 4, but only one of those would be a town hall meeting, three would be traditional debates with questions selected and posed by Obama-friendly mainstream media figures, and one would be an in-depth debate on foreign policy.

It’s not surprising that Obama, who recently said he would meet John McCain “anywhere, anytime,” would reject the idea of appearing side-by-side with McCain in ten town hall meetings. In recent weeks we’ve been witness to incidents where Obama was called upon to speak extemporaneously. In several instances he simply dissolved into a sputtering mass of “ahs” and “uhs,” incapable of uttering a simple declaratory sentence.

In one such episode, he came to a complete standstill in the middle of a stage, surrounded on all sides by his fawning supporters, pressed a finger against his earpiece… which had suddenly stopped transmitting the words he was supposed to repeat… and said, “Wait a minute, wait a minute, uh, wait a minute, uh, I can’t hear myself.”

Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines a “puppet” as a “small image in the human form… often with hinged limbs, moved by the hand or by strings… as in a mock drama. One acting as another wills; a fool.” It makes one wonder if we might one day find a picture of Obama next to that definition.

June 25, 2008 – The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana, struck down a Louisiana law allowing capital punishment for people convicted of raping children under the age of 12, saying it violates the Constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling spares two Louisiana men convicted of raping girls 5 and 8.

In a two-sentence, seven-waffle reaction, Obama said, “I have said repeatedly that I think that the death penalty should be applied in very narrow circumstances for the most egregious of crimes… I think that the rape of a small child, 6 or 8 years old, is a heinous crime, and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our Constitution.”

But where does Obama really stand? In 1999, while serving in the Illinois Senate, Obama was faced with a decision to support a bill that would have allowed juveniles who had gang-raped girls under the age of twelve, or who had murdered 8 and 10-year-olds in random drive-by shootings, to be tried as adults.

In that instance, Obama was running for reelection in an African American district in South Chicago, so he sidestepped the issue and voted “present.”

Clearly, Obama’s position on any issue depends on whether or not votes are at stake in the next election. He has yet to show where, in his fourteen years in public life, he has ever taken a stand on an issue that might have a negative impact on his own personal ambitions. Barack Obama is not only naïve and inexperienced… he is also a coward.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Michelle Obama Tells Hillary "Run Your Own House"

There is a zinger of a quote over at Kevin McCullough’s blog by Michelle Obama to Hillary:


3:20pm:Michelle Obama says (directed at Hillary): "One of the most important things that we need to know about the next President of the United States is, is he somebody that shares our values? Is he somebody that respects family? Is a good and decent person? So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. So, so we've adjusted our schedules to make sure that our girls are first..." Is "running your house" something you measure your candidates for President by? Should it be? 800.345.WMCA.



Wow! I know that a lot of the pundits were saying that Obama didn’t want to seem like the bad guy for attacking Hillary (male attacking female thing) and that he as well as John Edwards were leaving that to others, but not in my wildest dreams did I think the gloves would come off like this.

But, it does support a belief that I had when Obama was first touted as a candidate for president over/along with Hillary: The Obamas are not going to be brought to the presidency as vice-president without restraining Michelle Obama. I have lived and worked with black women all my life, and the very first time I heard Michelle talk, I knew she does not play second base or “yes-ma’ am” to anyone – and that is going to be A REQUIREMENT to get along with Hillary. Hillary has long been know for her sharp tongue and violent temper – especially when things don’t go her way. A black female is not going to take that from any other female, but especially so from a WHITE female.

BELIEVE ME, I’M NOT PROMOTING STEREO TYPES, I AM TELLING YOU FROM EXPERIENCE.

It won’t take long for Michelle to get tired of Hillary, and president or not, Michelle will at some point, figuratively or maybe literally, hand Hillary her head. The claws will come out, and it will not be pretty. Hillary feels that she is owed and ordained to be president, and she is sure not going to let some upstart pup from “Indie” push her off track. Neither is going to put up with crap from his “Kenya” doll in the white house. She is queen of the roost, and anyone who doesn’t like it can lay face-up in Fort Marcy Park.

If by some chance the Republicans did loose this race for ’08 (God forbid) and an Hillary/Obama ticket gets inaugurated, we WILL have a front row seat to the greatest shows on earth. Look and learn, WWE.

Labels: , ,

|

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Big Brother Hillary Orwell, 1984Ad (Thanks Obama Campaign)

For those who missed the discussion, someone took an old ad from the ‘80s and parodied it as an anti-Hillary ad. The identity of the ad-maker seemed to by a mystery – until now, maybe.

The blog Jammiewearingfool reports that Fox news’ Carl Cameron has identified the makers of the ad as “Blue State Digital,” “founded in early 2004 by four members of the Howard Dean Presidential campaign” who “are involved in providing custom Internet applications and communications strategies to primarily Democratic organizations, political candidates and non-profit organizations.” The real kicker is this: some of the makers of this video that was widely cited as an attack ad by the “vast right-wing conspiracy” have been traced back to the Obama campaign! You can read more on this story here.

I looked at the add, and I don’t see what the fuss was all about. I mean, if you look at it, the ad is actually funny and you know what they say; humor is funny because it contains a touch of truth.

BAAAAHHAAAHHAAAAHAAA!!!!!!

Labels: , , ,

|

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Satire: DNC Unleashes Unstoppable Super Candidate

More great satire form B.L.U. at "Where Have You Gone, Ronald Reagan"

DNC Unleashes Unstoppable Super-Candidate: Oprack Winframa
"If elected, I promise a new car to every American soldier who will cut-and-run."

Labels: , ,

|

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Thar She Blows! No, For Real This Time.

I guess the biggest news of the weekend was Hillary announcing what the rest of us have already known for some time; she was running for President in ’08. I’m sure this was a great shock to all of those on the left who thought that she couldn’t possibly have designs on the White House, after all, she seems so content there in the Senate. (That was sarcasm for all you libs lurking out there.)

Anyway, this can only be good news for conservatives. Hussein Obama’s announcement early in the week that he would assemble an exploratory committee for his presidential bid in ’08 spared us of anymore news reels with Hillary’s coy, “who me, my goodness no” crocodile tear attempt at Shirley Temple modesty as the Manhattan libs and the lapdog lib news media tried to make it seem like she needed coaxing to run for the Oval office. In truth, anyone standing in her way of the office is road kill. Liberal Democrats have believed from the get-go that this job should be Hillary’s in exchange for staying with “cigar Bill” and not putting America through it’s first presidential divorce – as would have been the case if she were a true N.O.W. feminist. Heck, it would have almost been like having a… royal family!

To libs the entire Clinton presidency was a missed opportunity. Liberalism had a chance to show how it could really change the world and Bill peed it down his leg. Conservatives, however, know that the entire Clinton presidency was a true showing of what America would be with these types of extreme left-wingers in charge; a 16 season production of “Animal House” with tax increases, gay weddings, and easy abortions for 9-year-olds between summer re-runs. So Hillary is now off to the White House to seek her ultimate revenge. She’s off to hurt kinda-sorta hubby Bill where it hurts him the most – no, the other place. Keeping him marginalized to the sidelines instead of being in the spotlight.

A sunny-side to a Hillary presidency might be the return of the items stolen from the White House last time she occupied it. Come to think of it, we’d better get contingency plans together now in case she wins. Get me Rent-A-Center on the phone! Everything worth $10.00 or more goes over to the Smithsonian now. Anyway, I digress.

Hillary running for president is great for conservatives.
Obama is the real threat from the Democratic/Liberal side of the aisle. Obama is a talented, fresh new face that has no background noise (so far) to cloud any portrayal that the Democrats could hang on him. He has no “cattle gate” history, no drowning victims or alcoholism (i.e. Kennedy,) no Vietnam baggage (i.e. Kerry) or tort trial séances (i.e. John Edwards.) He can be an every man’s man, with only 1/8th the work needed to fake it. Obama has the added advantage of being black. This gives the libs a chance to one-up Bush, who now has the record for promoting blacks to the highest positions in government history. Unfortunately, he has a snowballs chance in hell of surviving "Hurricane Hillary."
Hillary has Bill’s crack team of political killers who will un-earth everything we have ever not know about Obama’s past, be it political or personal. This will give the American public a good look at the man who wants to be the REAL first black president.
Hillary will be a much easier target for whoever the (probably Republican) challenger will be. She has a bigger history of scandals than Bill has, and I am sure all that she has done in the dark recesses of the congress over the last several years will add new darts of corruption and scandal that can justifiably be sent back at her. Also, Hillary has a huge temper as is verified by Clinton political operative Dick Morris. Over the long stresses of the political race, she will make mistakes and let her alter-ego show and the people will be reminded of who Madame Hillary really is.

Make no mistake. Hillary will be the Dems nomination. She has had her radar locked on that position for some time, she has paid her political dues over time to get in position for it, and she is not about to let some upstart pretty-face kid take what is rightfully hers. She will destroy Obama during the primaries (probably by proxy, through political favor seekers in the media, and those who owe her favors in the media, not to mention her die-hard “Hillary-lovers” who want nothing else but her. She will then take him as her running mate for VP (after some concessions to smooth over the damage to him that she has done and the hard feelings – probably on the side of Mrs. Obama.) Hillary has been VP for eight years already (sorry Al Gore) and she is not about to be someone else’s VP again. So happy “coming out” party Hillary. ‘Bout time you told us what we already knew.

Labels: , ,

|

Saturday, January 06, 2007

MainScreamMedia Has The Hots For B.H.O.

I'm sorry. This is so horribly biased it's funny.
Obama to headline Va. Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson dinner
Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. - Sen. Barack Obama will headline the Virginia Democratic Party's annual fundraising dinner next month.

The charismatic, fast-rising potential presidential prospect is in his first term from Illinois.

He'll address the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner on February 17th in Richmond.

The gala each year showcases key national Democratic figures.

Sen. John Kerry - the unsuccessful 2004 Democratic presidential nominee - has addressed the dinner twice since 2003.

Obama campaigned in Virginia last fall for Sen. Jim Webb.

He received a rock-star ovation alongside Webb and former Gov. Mark Warner at a rally in Richmond.

I've often wondered (not really) which Jefferson-Jackson they are referring to. Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson, perhaps?

This all brings back fond memories of the first Democrat/ic J-J event UCV attended back in '04.


MIB Same Planet, New Mission
Men Intending to elect Bush



No amnesty for these aliens

Labels: , ,

|