The Lie Made Flesh

The Muslim Hijacking of Ground Zero
Daniel Greenfield
The great cities of the world are littered with relics of the Muslim occupation of their sacred places. Jerusalem, Delhi, Constantinople and Alexandria

...the armies of Islam did not just kill or enslave, they robbed their victims of their culture and history—and replaced it with Islam. Ground Zero is their target once more. A hijacking not of planes, but of memory. And their targets are no longer just 3,000 people—but us all.

The Great Lie told and retold over and over again for the last 9 years, is that Islam was not responsible for 9/11. That lie has been repeated over and over again. It has permeated our culture. It has filled our media. The politicians have echoed it. Books and articles are written that treat it as something every reasonable person understands. Islam had nothing to do with 9/11. Not a damn thing.

The Ground Zero mosque is that lie made flesh

It is that revisionist history given physical form, turned into brick and mortar, steel and cement, raised up to the sky, to look down mockingly on the Ground Zero construction site itself, and the people who come there to reflect and remember. It mocks their memories. It mocks the dead.

Its arrogance is the same as that of the Muslim burners of the Great Library of Alexandria, of Hanan Ashrawi claiming there was no Jewish connection to Joseph’s Tomb, or Anwar Al-Awlaki, who had advised the 9/11 hijackers, telling reporters after the attacks that Islam opposes terrorism. It is an act of beheading, not of flesh, but of identity. It takes a blade and saws at the neck of a culture, cutting off its head through lies and deceit.

When Muslims conquer, they begin with massacres and end with colonization. The building they bought, had its value destroyed by their own attack on September 11. Now having bought the building at a loss, they intend to demolish it and turn it into a monument to the very ideology responsible for that massacre. As they have done before in Constantinople and Jerusalem. As they have done throughout the world. First they bomb. Now they occupy. First they kill, then they solicit converts. First they invade, then they rule. It is an ugly and bloody pattern that has held true for over a 1000 years of history. And here it is again.

When the Sudanese Muslim Janjaweed militias go out and rape non-Arab women, this was what they said to their victims. “The government gave me permission to rape you. This is not your land anymore.” That is the Ground Zero mosque, with Bloomberg giving his permission to allow Islam to declare that this too is not our land anymore. It is the rape of a place that has equal stature in American memory to Gettysburg or Arlington. It is a calculated act of cultural brutality, disguised with a fake smile. Its message is that this is not our land anymore. That these are not our memories anymore. That these too have been hijacked by the murderers.

Islam does not just destroy bodies, it destroys souls. It plots to rob entire peoples of their culture, their history and their identity. In order to make them into Muslims or Dhimmis, slaves of Muslims. Mohammed began the process by taking the existing belief systems in the region, combining them into a distorted ideology that he called Islam, which gave him the power to do anything he wanted, that exploded into massacres, ethnic cleansing and a wave of brutality and conquest that covered the globe. But the armies of Islam did not just kill or enslave, they robbed their victims of their culture and history—and replaced it with Islam. Ground Zero is their target once more. A hijacking not of planes, but of memory. And their targets are no longer just 3,000 people—but us all.

Obama Lied No One Died, Yet

TexasDarlin says:

Summary of Obama’s Deception
Barack Obama has misled and deceived the American public about his dual identity, dual citizenship, religious background, and birth records.
He was, and possibly still is, a citizen of Indonesia.
Contrary to Obama’s public statements that he’s “always been a Christian” Obama was at one time a Muslim.
His Hawaiian Birth Certificate reveals the legal name Barry Soetoro. His original Birth Certificate, with the name Barack H. Obama, was sealed.
That is why the Birth Certificate published on his campaign website “FightTheSmears” is fake. Barack Obama does not want you to know about his Soetoro identity.
Obama’s Deception: The Details
The Fake Birth Certificate:The Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) published on the Obama Campaign’s website “FightTheSmears” has been falsified. Two experts with combined experience of more than 60 years in document analysis and computer forensics are willing to testify if necessary. I have seen their professional qualifications; trust me, they would pass the “expert witness” test with flying colors. Their latest reports are provided below.
Indonesian Citizenship:Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, his step-father. He may still have Indonesian citizenship.
When was Obama going to disclose his Indonesian identity to the American electorate? The legal issues related to dual citizenship can be reasonably argued, and possibly will be.
But the immediate problem at this time, on the eve of the Democratic Convention, is that the “presumed nominee” has lied to the American public by intentionally withholding key information about his background and identity.
Religious Background:Obama underestimated the tolerance of Americans to accept his Muslim background. As Lolo Soetoro’s son, Barry Soetoro was a Muslim in Indonesia. But Obama has publicly proclaimed that he’s “never been a Muslim.” This claim is highlighted on his “FightTheSmears” website.
Obama has flat-out lied about this part of his life.
Will we hold him accountable for these deceptions?
Dual Citizenship Could Disqualify Obama from the Presidency
Obama has hidden the truth about his Indonesian identity and citizenship because it could disqualify him under Article II of the Constitution. So he thought he’d just ignore it.
Again, the legal issues can be reasonably argued, but when was Obama planning to tell the truth?
For a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues, see Judah Benjamin’s articles (links below). He lays out a strong argument that Obama is ineligible based on Art. II.
New Theory of Birth Certificate Events
Based on Judah Benjamin’s research, backed up by Polarik’s and Techdude’s analyses, I published my new theory of events on Wednesday in Birth Certificate: Obama, Soetoro, or Dunham?
Theory of Birth Certificate Events:1. Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, with the legal name Barack Hussein Obama II, and Barack H. Obama Sr. was identified as his legal father. [NOTE: an alternative theory, that Obama was born in Canada, is still being researched.]
2. Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii sometime around 1965-1966.
3. As part of the adoption procedure, pursuant to Hawaiian law, Obama’s original Birth Certificate (BC) was sealed, and a new Birth Certificate was issued with his new name, Barry Soetoro, and the name of his new father, Lolo Soetoro.
4. Mother and son joined Soetoro in Indonesia, where Barry Soetoro was registered in school as Lolo’s son, a Muslim, and a citizen of Indonesia.
5. After approximately 4 years, Barry Soetoro returned to Hawaii as a U.S. citizen to live with his grandparents, the Dunhams, and attend private school.
6. At some point before his 18th birthday, he most likely changed his legal name back to Barack Hussein Obama, but his Birth Certificate would not have been modified again unless there was another adoption (by the Dunhams, for example).
Among the questions asked therein:If any or all of these hypothesized facts are TRUE, why has Senator Obama deceived the American public, and will the public hold him accountable for the deceptions?
CONCLUSION
It is theorized that:
Barack Obama has misled the American people about his background and his identity. The deception involves an intentional initiative to conceal records related to his birth and his childhood. These records would demonstrate that he acquired Indonesian citizenship when his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, adopted him; he was a Muslim; his Birth Certificate is in the legal name of Barry Soetoro; and he may still hold Indonesian citizenship today.
Barack Obama has undertaken a concerted and systematic effort to alter, delete, or hide records about his personal and professional life. His secrecy is unprecedented among presidential candidates in American History.
What will our Democratic Party leadership do to ensure that a vetted candidate is nominated for President?
Links

To fully understand the basis of the assertions herein, the following articles should be read in full:
Birth Certificate: Obama, Soetoro, or Dunham by TexasDarlin
The Paper Trail: Obama’s Indonesia Background by Judah Benjamin
Obama the Indonesian: ‘Citizen of the World’? by TexasDarlin
Divided Loyalties: Obama’s Eligibility Problem, Part 2 by Judah Benjamin
Divided Loyalties: Obama’s Eligibility Problem, Part 1 by Judah Benjamin
Obama’s Birth — Questions Remain by TexasDarlin
Obama was likely born in Hawaii — does that mean he’s Eligible? by TexasDarlin
Barack was Born in Two Hospitals, Sister Maya was Born Twice! by Texas Darlin
Forensics Expert: COLB is a Forgery by Techdude
Polarik’s Analysis of Forgery– assorted posts at Polarik’s blog
Other background articles can be read at TexasDarlin
DISCLAIMER/COPYRIGHT: This article presents draft and preliminary viewpoints and information, all of which is subject to change. It is intended to be strictly theoretical and hypothetical, in an effort to examine and vet the background, qualifications, and eligibility for U.S. President of a serious candidate and public figure who is standing for that office. The assertions made herein are believed to be true by the author based on good-faith efforts to research the facts related to a public figure running for public office. In the event that documentation deemed to be reliable by the author comes to the author’s attention disproving one or more of the assertions made herein, corrections will be published.
Nothing herein should be quoted, cited, copied, or otherwise used or shared in whole or part without providing a link to the original source on the TexasDarlin blog, and acknowledging the author, TexasDarlin, which is a pseudonym. Nothing in this article should be used in a way that misrepresents the author’s meanings.

Coincidence? Happenstance? or Enemy Action?

In the James Bond novel "Dr No," Ian Fleming's character Dr. No said "once is coincidence, twice is happenstance, but three times is enemy action." He was referring to the recurrence of similar actions over a period of time involving the same people, specifically the fact that Agent 007 kept showing up in his neighborhood and causing trouble. The novels by Ian Fleming were a staple of my high school years. I devoured them. The movies, while good, did not do justice to the novels they were made from. Casino Royale was one of the best novels, and one of the worst movies. You should read that one. But I digress.

There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning it is civilization suicide. Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful.

Where is our investigative press?

Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe, brings-forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd. Lies and deception behind a master plan - the ingredients for 'The Manchurian Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's White House?
Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist runs for President at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing strides into the United States? Is it mere coincidence this same candidate wants to dis-arm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? Is it mere coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global jihad from Muslim nations?

Change for America? What change? To become another 'Nation of Islam'?

Keeping this to yourself does NOT get the word out to those who need to read it. For THOSE to take over is for us to do NOTHING!!

The rest of this is posted at my blogspot site. You should go read the whole thing.

Background on the origins the philosophies of Obama's church

Just a few quick notes:

Obama's church.

Muslim reaction to Obama's speech on race.

Gays For Thee, But Not With Me

Ok, there's just no way to let the day pass by without posting a genuine laugh, and a snark at Iranian clown "Ma-MOOD" "Ahmadine-junkie."

Most of the statements he made at his "visit" to Columbia University Re-education camp, were totally expected: plenty on evasive non-answers to the questions posed to him.

What we failed to see ahead of time was that "My Mood" really did have a bomb -- and apparently, used it on the Iranian people to eradicate all gays from the face of Iran. He declares that the "phenomenon" that is affecting the rest of the world has no impact on Iran; they have no gays.

The only thing crazier than his answer is the reaction of the Columbia student/faculty/"what ever"audience. A crowd that had previously backed the tiny dictator, suddenly turned offensive and boo-ed and laughed at his statement. Apparently planning to eradicate one of the largest Jewish states from the face of the earth if fine, but declaring there be no more gays just can't be tolerated by the inhabitants of the ivy-league.

What's really funny, is that if "Ma-mood's" stupid story had been correct, the "gay-rights" activists, atheists, and other anti-war loonies who support the gay agenda would have been guilty of aiding and supporting the very regime -- a religious regime -- that had succeeded in doing what their arch-enemy Christianity had never been able to do -- eradicating the gay life-style from the face of an entire country. Maybe one day they will figure it out.

The world is upside down.

Beat up by a girl.......

Hahahahahahahaha!
h/t Jules Crittenden

Head of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice in the Eastern province Dr. Mohamed bin Marshood al-Marshood, told Asharq Al Awsat that two of the Commission's employees were verbally insulted and attacked by two inappropriately-dressed females, in the old market in Prince Bandar street, an area usually crowded with shoppers during the month of Ramadan.

According to Dr. Al-Marshood, the two commission members approached the girls in order to "politely" advice and guide them regarding their inappropriate clothing.

Consequently, the two girls started verbally abusing the commission members, which then lead to one of the girls pepper-spraying them in the face as the other girl filmed the incident on her mobile phone, while continuing to hurl insults at them.

The Eastern Province's head of the commission also revealed that with the help of the police his two employees were able to control the situation.

Can't you see the police laughing at these poor b@@tards? They deserve it every time. Next time they'll call in swat for backup.

Carter Out Campaigning for Hamas -- Again

Could someone please take Jimmy Carter home and medicate him? How could America have EVER elected a person like this to the White House? Carter’s time in office was, of course, looonnnnnggg before I was old enough to understand politics, but just looking at the crazy things he has said over the last decade and I have to wonder just how he got into office. Here’s his latest:

Hat Tip: LGF

The United States, Israel and the European Union must end their policy of
favoring Fatah over Hamas, or they will doom the Palestinian people to deepening
conflict between the rival movements, former US President Jimmy Carter said
Tuesday.
Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate who was addressing a
conference of Irish human rights officials, said the Bush administration’s
refusal to accept the 2006 election victory of Hamas was “criminal.”
Carter said Hamas, besides winning a fair and democratic mandate that should have entitled it to lead the Palestinian government, had proven itself to be far more organized in its political and military showdowns with the Fatah movement of
Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

Favoring Fatah over Hamas? On any relevant topic, there is almost no difference between Fatah and Hamas! They are both radical terrorist killers who keep their people (what few that are not as radical as they are) oppressed and frightened. They oppress free speech and the free exercise of religion in their “countries” – such as it is.
They are both Jew-hating, Zionist conspiracy wielding, pork-petrified, woman-hating, gun toting, bomb throwing, suicide vest wearing murderers, who are so in love with death that they would murder each other out of existence without the common thread of hate for Israel. And that reaction is only to Carter’s first sentence! Jimmy Carter is so out of line, he should be a circle, and is certainly not someone to be seriously listened to on ANY subject, and certainly not foreign policy.

Charles at LGF says: “Far more organized” = much better at murder, torture, and violence. It’s just astounding that Carter would use a phrase like that to describe the nightmarish atrocities that have gone on in Gaza.”

More Anti-Jew Hatred from Iranian TV

Understatement of the week:

“An anti-Semitic cartoon recently shown on Iranian TV shows a Jewish rabbi planting a Nazi swastika, covering it with dirt, watering it and watching as a giant star of David grows in its place.”

For those that follow any of the blogs that watch the Middle East media, only this particular ad is new. The racist anti-Jew media spots and programs have been going on for years. This one is said to have started its run in Islamic media in January of this year:

“Iran, having vowed to wipe Israel off the map, appears to be fomenting anti-Semitic sentiment through its media.”
“The clip is currently being broadcast on the Web site of the Middle East Media Research Institute's (MEMRI) TV project.
Yigal Carmon, the president of MEMRI, said the message from the cartoon is clear.
"The idea the that they are trying to show is that Zionism [the worldwide Jewish movement that resulted in the creation of Israel] comes out from the seed of Nazism. They're saying that it is the technical Jew who nurtures it and who plants it and who grows it and who irrigates it and all that," Carmon said. "Usually they would say they are not against Jews they are only against Zionists, but here you see they are saying that in fact there is no difference," Carmon said about the cartoon. "It’s the Jew who plants the swastika image and from the swastika comes Zionism."”

Brits Foil Islamist Plan to Kidnap and Behead Citizens in Brittian

The Brits have foiled a plot by “British-Muslim Islamic terrorists” [my words, not theirs] to kidnap “a British Muslim soldier” hold him hostage and execute him in a “Ken Bigley-style execution:”

Eight people were arrested during a series of pre-dawn raids in the city as part of a major nationwide anti-terror investigation. Sources said it marked a
"new departure" for terrorism in the UK and that a major "close quarters" terror strike had been thwarted.
The alleged plot, said to have been in the later
stages of planning, would have mirrored the kidnappings of Mr Bigley and fellow British hostage Margaret Hassan by Iraqi insurgents. The intended hostage - said to be a young Muslim soldier in the British army who had served in
Afghanistan - would have been filmed, made to plead for his life and ultimately executed, sources alleged.
One of the men arrested in the Alum Rock area was named locally as Amjad Mahmood, 29. His brother, who did not want to be named, told reporters: "The police won't let me know where he is. His wife and kids are very distressed. My mother and father are very distressed. The police
won't tell them where he is." Local councillor Ansar Ali Khan said he had spoken to the father of the arrested man. Councillor Khan said: "He was in shock to know that his son had been arrested." He described him as "a very hard
working local businessman", adding: "He has served the community for 30 years and he is proud to be British. He can not imagine his son having any link to this sort of activity."

Much has been said about how “moderate muslims” wouldn’t attack us and don’t support terrorism. That is probably true. But this can show 1.) just how close radical jihad can be to them and 2.) It can be anyone around them – even the ones they think could not possibly be involved.

The report says this incident “raises the possibility of an individual being randomly snatched off the street and held hostage, with 'demands' issued in return for their release. Such a tactic has not been employed in the UK but is a constant threat for foreigners in Iraq.”

Sorry my friend, what you’re thinking about is called a hostage for ransom. That’s not what the Islamists are doing. This is FAR more sinister. What’s going on here is called “psychological warfare.” Any demands met by the countries of origin or the families of those who have been taken are purely icing on the cake for islamists. Their real intentions are to string out the countries anxiety, get all media attention on them, and then kill the hostage in front of the world. Their whole point is to degrade the will of the people they oppose, and to provide inspiration for those who fight on the jihadists’ side – yes, the terrorist jihadi “holy warriors” find this sort of thing to be very inspirational. Anyway, the long and the short of the story is that for Europe, running from the war in Iraq is looking more like running to the fight, since the Islamists seem to be willing to bring their tactics in Iraq home to them.

*****Update*****

More information on this is available at Michelle Malkin's site including:

• More information from "theSun.com.uk"
• A link to a "British Muslim youth poll" 13 percent 'admired' organizations such as Al Qaeda

Says Michelle: "[This] news is no shock."

*****

Virgil Goode's Office Vandalized: Anybody Surprised?

Virgil Goode's office in the college town of Charlottesville, Va. was vandalized with the word BIGOT painted on the front window according to a Charlottesville weekly, The Hook.

How Do You Write Idiot In Arabic?

There are just so many things about this "project" that are stupid, contemptuous, arrogant and just plain wrong. It sounds like a college prank of some sort but no, some uptight religious types got together and plastered signs in Arabic all over the GRTC buses and on a couple of campuses in the Richmond area. They supposedly translate into silly, innocuous words.


(translation: paper scissors rock )
(what they really wanted to say: stupid infidels ride buses)

From an article at DailyPress.com titled New Virginia Program Aims To Dispel Fears Of Muslim Community.

"As people see Arabic, they immediately make an association with terrorism," said the Rev. C. Douglas Smith, executive director of the Virginia Interfaith Center. "That's probably because since Nine-Eleven, not only is fear overwhelming us, but that's how we're being trained to think."

Hellooooo... I may be mad as hell about what terrorists did to my country on 911, but overwhelmed by fear? No, sir. And I don't know who trained Rev. Smith to think, but my coaches were a good Christian momma, Bishop Fulton Sheen and William Wallace. I win.

"The transit company has already fielded several calls from concerned riders, said Gretchen Schoel, executive director of A More Perfect Union. One woman Schoel described as a well-educated university employee placed a frantic call to the bus company's manager, suggesting the FBI be called in to investigate. Even after the signs' English translations were explained to her, she remained concerned that they might contain secret messages, Schoel said."

Ms. Schoel, are you mocking this woman? Frankly, since the reporter doesn't include any direct information from Greater Richmond Transit, I find no reason to believe the incident happened, much less in the manner described.

In fact, there doesn't seem to be any follow up with passengers or students.

In fact, this reads suspiciously like a *gasp* press release modified to look like journalism! Oh no, that can't be true.

Let's just blame it on the way I was trained to think.

"After World War II, when people saw Japanese script it was scary," she said. "But now we see it and it's fun, it's hip, it signifies a cool culture."
"That's a huge turnaround."

Good grief. That has got to be a misquote. AFTER World War II, when we had DEFEATED the Japanese up one side and down the other, they were anything but scary to Americans. Our GI's in the rehab years came home with Japanese brides and tons of ceramic geegaws. Nowhere is there a recorded incident of an American freaking out after hanging a bamboo calendar in their kitchen.

Bias toward the Muslim community is a continuing problem across the country and in Virginia, said Imad Damaj, president of the Virginia Muslim Coalition for Public Affairs. "There's so many lazy, unexamined assumptions about all of us and how we react to people," Damaj said. "We need to challenge ourselves."

You lost me on lazy, Damaj. Hint: if you want to change the way people perceive you, do not insult them. You go right ahead and challenge yourself all you want, though. It's still a free country.

Hat tip to FreeRepublic.com

"Allahu Akbar," Keith Ellison, And The First "Dot."

Allahu Akbar, Keith Ellison, And The First “Dot”

11/12/2006 6:54 AM
The basic question I get on this [“ ‘Allahu Akbar’ Heard As New Democrat Congressman Gives Victory Speech”] seems to be “So what? What’s wrong with them praising God?” Though not an indictment in-and-of-itself, “Allahu Akbar” in this setting is – and should be – a cause of concern for America:
1) It is the rallying cry for those violent jihadist Muslims and their supporters – the same Islamic radical militants that not only America and it’s allies fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, but the rest of the world struggles with for survival in Africa, South East Asia, Europe, and the continental U.S. As of now we make only the presumption that it was the “moderate, peaceful” Muslims who shouted with joy, and not radicals. It may very well have been radicals. The consequences of being wrong by endorsing the “sunny side” are too dire to ignore.

2) It shows that, without a doubt, there are areas of the U.S. where the support from fellow Muslims and U.S. citizens (Democrats, in this case) is so great that a Muslim can be elected.

3) Now that congressman-elect Ellison’s district has seen an election “first” (first Muslim elected to congress) those trends tend to stay. If Congressman-elect Ellison himself is not sympathetic to the radical jihadist cause, how long before a candidate who IS can be elected there?

4) We as a nation know nothing of Congressman-elect Ellison outside of his conversion to Islam in college, that he is a Democrat, and a professed “politician.” We know nothing of his acquaintances, close ties, or whom he may owe favors/sympathy to. We know nothing of his college connections (favorite recruiting ground for radicals) or current connections to those who we may consider radicals (and you know how much we hate surveillance of radical Muslims and their connections in this country via the Patriot Act.) Congressman-elect Ellison will have access to sensitive information, and with time and politic-ing, be on committees covering military budgets, base closures, financing, homeland security, port security, and – maybe – counter-terrorism efforts.

5) Now that groups like CAIR and the radical Muslim Brotherhood see that it is possible to elect Muslims to federal government office, how tempting will it now be to radical jihadist movements here in the U.S. to field candidates (or have people on the candidates staff) who will be beholden to the radicalist’s view and be willing to supply them with information harmful to us and our way of life. Heck, even Hamas has a “political wing.”

6) Indeed, with CAIR’s own history, their interest in Congressman-elect Ellison should perk up the ears of anyone following homeland security.

Not taking into consideration these facts when noting what some consider to be a small, innocent incident at a victory party, smacks of pre-911 mindset faced away from national security, and may one day constitute a failure to “connect the dots” beginning with the first dot, and you know how the left hates not connecting the dots.

Background on CAIR:
http://www.meforum.org/article/916