Thursday, July 24, 2008

So What Kind of Change Can We Expect?

Family Security Matters

How would Barack Hussein Obama govern if elected to the presidency? With less than one term as a U.S. senator, and with most of that time having been spent running for president, it’s a little hard to say but there are certainly some good indicators. There is no question that Obama is very liberal (the most liberal U.S. senator, based on a National Journal vote ranking). With a voting record in line with folks like John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Barbara Boxer et al, an Obama presidency would certainly mean more government “solutions” to our problems. We already have plenty of that now, so the only “change” would be more of the same – except in greater quantities.

What about defending our borders? Millions of illegal aliens are now in this country draining our resources, closing down hospitals that can no longer afford to provide them free treatment, demanding we learn Spanish rather than they learning English, depositing “anchor babies” on our soil who immediately become citizens and “entitled” to gobs of goodies at taxpayer expense. The Bush Administration has done nothing to impede the flow, and it is quite evident Obama – “the agent of change” – will do nothing either. Obama actually agrees with the illegals by the way, and thinks your children should learn Spanish. Sounds like more of the same, only pushed absurdly even further.

What about increasing oil supplies? We could start lifting these restrictions on drilling for our own oil and building refineries, and the price of oil would go down. It has the added benefit of decreasing our dependence on the Middle East. For years, our own government has kept us dependent on OPEC, rather than looking for ways to become self-reliant. Barack Obama is opposed to drilling offshore or in ANWR. Change? Sounds like more of the same to me…

What about out of control judges who legislate from the bench? Courts packed with liberal judges have been pushing liberal causes down our throats for some time now. What types of judges would Obama appoint? He has spoken glowing words of praise for Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David H. Souter. Not exactly my idea of strict constructionists who follow the intent of the constitution. With more of these types being added to federal courts that are already chock full of liberals, we’d be getting, yes – more of the same.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

|

Thursday, May 15, 2008

An open letter to Republicans in Virginia

To all the Republicans in Virginia, including Congressman Cantor,

Why are you lying to us?

"John McCain appeals to almost all Republicans. He also appeals to a wide array of independents and conservative Democrats."

What freaking Republicans are those? When you lose 30% of the vote in already decided primaries, you are not a popular guy.

Rep. Tom Cole, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Democrats have succeeded in running conservatives immune to being tied to the national Democratic Party. He said the solution for Republicans is to work with Mr. McCain to define a new agenda.

A new agenda would be RUNNING AS A CONSERVATIVE, YOU IDIOTS! SEE HOW THE DEMOCRATS DID IT? DO THAT!

"Candidates who hope to succeed must show that they're willing and able to join McCain in a leading movement for reform," House Minority Leader John Boehner, Ohio Republican, said in the wake of Democrat Travis Childer's victory in Mississippi's first congressional district — a seat that had been firmly Republican. In other words, if you don't toe the line, you won't get any help. Guys? What the hell has John McCain ever done for you or the party? If he wants to run as a liberal maverick, let him win it on his own. I'm not sending money or support. He'll be lucky if he gets my vote.

But it is precisely that independent streak that is drawing Republicans to his coattails, hoping he can cleanse them of the stain of gridlocked Washington. Again, what coattails? Cleanse them of a stain of gridlock? Republicans LOVE GRIDLOCK IF IT DEFEATS THE LIBERAL PURPOSES!

Eric Cantor, Republican chief deputy whip in the House of Representatives, told reporters that the McCain brand was healthier than that of his party. Of course its healthier. But, you can consider a leper healthier than the poor bastard dying of the plague. The GOP has shot ITSELF in the head by being LIBERAL, CORRUPT, SPENDTHRIFTS. McCain is popular with the press and "independents." The GOP has NEVER been popular with the press.

"John McCain is a demonstrated vote getter among independents, and his message and what he will be able to do in this election is extremely important." In other words, he can't depend on Republicans to vote for him. What was that about attracting Republicans? C'mon Eric, show some Virginia spine. Stand up for conservatives! You know, the ONES THAT PUT YOU IN OFFICE!

House Republican minority leader John Boehner told Fox News that with McCain at the top of the ticket, his demoralized party might spring a surprise in November. With our luck, he'll pick a Democratic VP.....

"I think that we're going to do a lot better than people think," Boehner said. Better than FUBAR? That's an easy one.

To use a military term that Senator McCain should be familiar with....SNAFU


Look it up.

Oh, and to any actual politicians that want to reply, go ahead and leave a comment

Labels: , , , ,

|

Monday, February 04, 2008

The Three Amigos

Please tell me the difference in the positions of these candidates in regards to illegal immigration.



So, Republican Party, who ARE YOU running for President?

Labels: , , , ,

|