Friday, May 21, 2010

Victory Through Inveigling

What will it take to convince our rank and file Federal law enforcement agents that radical islamic jihadists don't turn? They will not turn against their core beliefs or allah or mohammed. They are dedicated and resolved to their mission: the destruction of Western Civilization and the imposition of sharia law. They will use that opportunity as a means of continuing the jihad and gaining intelligence.

You cannot flip a "true-believer". I'm watching the FoxNews special "American Terorist". Alwaki, Al Wacky, Al the Goat Humper...either this guy is a freaking genius the way he played the US government like a symphony, or he had some serious help from people in high/low places. Its the second scenario which is most troubling.

They're laughing at us. They're sitting over there, (or sitting here) and howling with glee at the stupidity of Westerners. They know the majority of Americans do not take the threat of jihad seriously; its just a myth; it's a lie concocted to justify actions by Western agencies and governments to eliminate islam; its a continuation of the Crusades; we want to steal their oil.

Here's a newsflash for ya, Pally: Radical islamic jihadists are lying to you about everything. From the imams who encourage and inspire, to the foot soldiers who strap on the bombs or manage to convince others to do it, to the ones who scream brutality (there's irony for ya) when they are captured. They will tell you islam is a religion of peace. That it is no threat to Western society.

THEY ARE LYING TO YOU.

Its part of their operational strategy. The koran tells them to lie to further islam. mohammed is to islam what saul alinsky is to radical socialism. The koran and rules for radicals are identical in philosphy and implementation.

Subjugation of non-muslims, implementation of sharia law and total victory over Western Civilization by inveigling.

Check out this article from Political Islam.

We are all kafirs.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Sunday, February 21, 2010

DCExaminer Editorial Highlights

TODAY'S WASHINGTON EXAMINER EDITORIAL SECTION HIGHLIGHTS

CPAC: Conservatives must avoid complacency

Examiner Editorial
"Conservatives also better not be deluded into thinking Obama and the Democrats won't do whatever they can, fair or foul, to win the coming campaign."

Attack in Little Rock 'like other killings we have'?

Diana West, Examiner Columnist
"I'm not the only one confounded by the prosecutor's inexplicable and highly disturbing decision to follow a see-no-Islam strategy. Muhammad himself recently wrote to the judge claiming he was encountering legal obstacles to changing his plea to guilty."

Another Massachusetts Miracle rising in Hoosier land?

Ken Tomlinson, OpEd Contributor
"All this is a stunning development for the young farmer and businessman who only four years ago was the youngest member of the Indiana legislature. In Washington power circles former Sen. Dan Coats has been all but anointed the GOP nominee for the Bayh seat."

Obama's new envoy to Islam

Mark Durie, OpEd Contributor
"At his most recent post as White House Deputy Associate Counsel, Hussain helped draft Obama s New Beginning address to the Muslim world in Cairo. That speech mentioned human rights, but it emphasized dialogue rather than defending individual liberties."
WORTH A READ, TOO

Want to know how to really astroturf a movement?

Mark Tapscott on Beltway Confidential

John Murtha forgot Semper Fi

Tom Stone, OpEd Contributor

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Monday, November 09, 2009

There Were 14 Lives Taken At Ft Hood

The news reports keep saying 13 people were killed by the asshat moozie jihadi turncoat. They are wrong.

There were 14 lives taken by this worthless piece of excrement in search of its 72 goats in whatever passes for paradise in their twisted little minds.

One of the Warriors who died was pregnant. Two months pregnant.

So this lying piece of scum took a truly innocent life when it decided to load two weapons, pack extra clips, and walk into a building full of unarmed people and start shooting. Some of those killed were shot in the back, BTW.

There is a room in Hell reserved for monsters such as this. There is no room service, no bellhops, no phone, no pool. And if there is justice, there are no windows or doors, once its inside. Just the screams of the souls this terrorist sent to Heaven.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Whitebread Jihadis

You know, I've been watching the developments of the terrorist plots uncovered in recent months, and something just does not compute. I can understand a Muslim extremist wanting to kill Americans, thats what they do.

What baffles me is the seemingly normal Americans, your "white-bread boys" from middle class homes, raised in America their entire lives, enjoying every advantage this great Nation has to offer, unfettered by any restrictions on freedom or liberty, who suddenly pop-up on the scene, accused of plotting with islamic extremists to kill their fellow countrymen.

Not just fellow countrymen, but active-duty Marines and soldiers, according to the reports out of North Carolina. What happend? What incident in their lives set these idiots down a path of destruction?

They made a conscious descision to work with extremists. They could have stopped at any time; or simply chose not to participate and informed authorities. Were they part of some self-proclaimed vigilante group who thought they could stop the extemists and were simply caught in the process of another investigation?

Or are they truly the knuckleheads they appear to be? I doubt we'll ever know the whole truth, but if there are anymore of these wanna-be home-grown jihadis with a death-wish out there, I hope the relevant agencies have the resources to hunt them down and hopefully give them the opportunity to receive their 72 goats in paradise. There's just nothing that can compare to a dead tango.

Senators Have Wires Crossed On Security
By Debra Saunders
October 1, 2009

On Tuesday, Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old Afghan immigrant who was a teenager in Queens during the Sept. 11 attacks, pleaded not guilty to federal terrorism conspiracy charges in New York.

This is a scary story. Police stopped and searched Zazi's rented car on the George Washington Bridge on Sept. 10, as the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks loomed and President Obama was about to join world leaders at a U.N. confab.

According to the U.S. attorney's office, Zazi flew to Pakistan in August 2008 to receive bomb-making instructions, returned to use the Internet and nine pages of handwritten bomb-making notes he had e-mailed himself from Pakistan to purchase and mix triacetone triperoxide (TATP) -- the explosive used in the 2005 London transit bombings that killed 52 commuters.

Prosecutors have announced that they will use communications obtained under the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act that allows for secret wiretapping for national security reasons. The New York Daily News reported that authorities had been watching Zazi for more than a year after a "lucky hit" wiretap caught Zazi communicating with Osama bin Laden's followers.

Meanwhile, in Washington, a group of Democratic senators are working to undermine FISA. Sens. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.; Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; Russ Feingold, D-Wis.; and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; introduced the Retroactive Immunity Repeal Act that would make the country free again for lawyers who want to sue telephone companies for cooperating with the federal government.

As Dodd said in a news release: "We make our nation safer when we eliminate the false choice between liberty and security."

Wrong; it is a very real choice. As Heritage Foundation fellow Jena Baker McNeill told me, allowing lawyers to sue telecommunication companies "would probably chill their willingness to participate in national security investigations" -- which is not good because "the government can't do this without their participation."

McNeill co-authored a Heritage paper in July that reported that 23 terrorist attacks
have been foiled since 9/11. With Zazi's recent arrest -- and that of two would-be bombers in Illinois and Texas -- the number of thwarted attacks today would be 26.
Where does President Obama stand? In 2008, after he won the Democratic primary, Obama flip-flopped on a promise to filibuster any FISA reauthorization bill that granted telecom companies immunity to lawsuits. Obama was one of 69 senators who voted for the FISA bill -- immunity wart and all.

Leahy argued that he opposed that bill because it "stripped Americans of their right to seek accountability for the Bush administration's decision to illegally wiretap American citizens without a warrant."

Where is the accountability in squeezing companies that did what the government told them to do? Especially after Washington passed a law that granted them immunity last year?

With what is at stake, why would any U.S. senator want to give phone companies a reason not to cooperate with law enforcement?
---

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

|