Possible Obama speech found in trash

Highlights in Green are mine. Orange are changes to the speech by....someone.....

Good evening. (LIE! Obama is on the air.)

As we speak, our nation faces a multitude of challenges. At home, our top priority is to recover and rebuild from take advantage of? a recession that has touched the lives of nearly every American to advance my agenda. Abroad, our brave men and women in uniform are taking the fight to al Qaeda wherever it exists with very restrictive ROE to prevent bad press. And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast, where I walked aimlessly about and drank alcoholic girly drinks, to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our citizens. But enough about our war on oil....

On April 20th, an explosion ripped through BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, about forty miles off the coast of Louisiana. Eleven workers lost their lives. Seventeen others were injured. And soon, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the ocean, oil began spewing into the water. Of course, fixing something like this on land, like at ANWR, would be child's play.

Because there has never been a leak of this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology. That is why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge – a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning an ass kicking physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice. Of course, I haven't yet talked to the CEO OF THE OIL COMPANY INVOLVED, THAT'S JUST CRAZY TALK.

As a result of these efforts, we have directed Barack Petroleum to mobilize additional equipment and technology. In the coming days and weeks, these efforts should capture up to 90% of the oil leaking out of the well. This is until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that is expected to stop the leak completely.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced. And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it is not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days. The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years. I can use this crisis FOREVER! Bush had it easy. New Orleans is all fixed, uh, better now.

But make no mistake: we will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long it takes, to pass Cap and Trade. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy. Except keep their most important and vital industry alive. That..we're going to shut down.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward: what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again. (Pssst, Rahm, what was the plan again?)

First, the cleanup. From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been voting present in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history – an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost forty years of experience responding to disasters. We now have nearly 30,000 ass-kicking personnel who are working across four states to contain and cleanup the oil. Thousands of ass-kicking ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf. And I have authorized the deployment of over 17,000 ass-kicking National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, clean beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims – and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible. However, if it fails, its all BP's fault.

Because of our lack of leadership efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been needlessly spilled removed from the water through burning, skimming, and other collection methods. Millions more would have been removed if I had not blocked other countries from assisting the US. Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil. Miles more of boom sit in a warehouse, ignored by the federal gov't, even though it was requested by Gov. Jindal back in May. But he's a Republican.... you know how that goes. We have approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try and stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we are working with Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines. I had to approve the construction of the barrier islands, Gov. Jindal went ahead without me.

As the clean up continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need, as long as it doesn't impact the unions, cost George Soros money, or prevents my agenda from advancing. Now, a mobilization of this speed(speed? Day 57!) and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise. I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip. So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it. If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them. (Um.....dude, suspend the Jones Act and get more damn booms, and remove the moratorium, and uh....cut the paper work.......OH. you meant about advancing Cap and Trade. Never mind.)

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts (That's his BEST effort? We're doomed.), oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no matter how effective our response becomes, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast. Except for the, you know, oil industry......

You know, for generations, men and women who call this region home have made their living from the water. That living is now in jeopardy. That's right! I've completely gutted the oil drilling industry in Lousiana for years to come. Georgie Soros has to make money with Petrobras Oil. I’ve talked to shrimpers and fishermen who don’t know how they’re going to support their families this year. I’ve seen empty docks and restaurants with fewer customers – even in areas where the beaches are not yet affected. I’ve talked to owners of shops and hotels who wonder when the tourists will start to come back. The sadness and anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost. It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost, but the oil industry workers will just have to get new jobs......

I refuse to let that happen. Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and kick his ass on pay per view, that should pay for the spill inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And the US will pay the oil workers that I have ruined..what? And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent, third party. I'm sure the SEIU can do it.

Beyond compensating the people of the Gulf in the short-term, it’s also clear we need a long-term plan to restore the unique beauty and bounty of this region. The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that has already suffered multiple (uh...one) economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation caused by the Federal Government's Army Corps of Engineers that has led to disappearing wetlands and habitats and some of the best hunting and fishing in America. And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment. So, here I go. I'm the man!

I make that commitment tonight. Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, a former governor of Mississippi, and a son of the Gulf, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible. The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists, and other Gulf residents. And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region. Anybody but the oil industry. Or me. I don't want any responsibility, just credit. And Barack Petroleum will foot the bill for the whole thing. Or go broke. I don't care.

The third part of our response plan is the steps we’re taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again. A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe – that the proper technology would be in place and the necessary precautions would be taken. Absolutely, positively, guaranteed safe. This plan comes from the same place that the green jobs and free energy comes from. Someone said that if this had happened in ANWR, that it would have been fixed within days. And if we had kept drilling close inshore, it would have been fixed within a couple of weeks. I'm sure they're wrong. They're not me.

That was obviously not the case on the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to know why.( Because you and yours took money from BP and gave them safety awards LAST YEAR!) The American people deserve to know why. The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion – these families deserve to know why. And so I have established a National Commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place so that no fault is placed on me. Already, I have issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling. I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety, and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue. (Except we haven't bothered to ask THEM and the industry experts stated that the moratorium is unnecessary and will set back the industry for YEARS.) And while I urge the Commission to complete its work as quickly as possible, I expect them to do that work thoroughly and impartially, and keep the blame off of me.

One place we have already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service. Over the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility – a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves. At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight. Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors, and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations. And then my administration continued where they left off, taking bribe, uh, campaign donations for as long as BP supported Cap and Trade.

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency and he failed miserably. But he kept the money flowing. But it’s now clear that the problems there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow. Cap and Trade still isn't passed. And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency – Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General. I wonder if this IG will be as independent as those Obama fired in the financial world. His charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog – not its partner.

One of the lessons we’ve learned from this spill is that we need better regulations, better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling. But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk. After all, oil is a finite resource. We consume more than 20% of the world’s oil, but have less than 2% of the world’s oil reserves. And that’s part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean – because we’re running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water. (Because the environmentalists prevent us from drilling on land and in shallow water. ANWR anybody?)

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we have talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked – not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor. And that's why I'm authorizing the building of 200 nuclear power pla.....wait. What? No way.

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are drilling off our Florida coast in deep water because we won't do it investing in clean energy jobs OH BS and industries that should be here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future. Therefore, I'm destroying the American Oil industry and putting them on welfare. Coal is next. The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that environmentalist wackos cause unintended consequences when the prevent shallow drilling that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash American innovation and seize control of our own destiny. Therefore, I'm authorizing the formation of the Agency for Federal Unicorn-Based Alimentary Resources.

This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels will take some time, but over the last year and a half, we have already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry. As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels. Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient. Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that will someday lead to entire new industries. So those dozens of people can look to a happy future. In China.

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us. As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of good, middle-class jobs – but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation – workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors. We have to hurry! Novemeber is coming and the GOP is going to Kick MY Ass.

When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence. And no one listened! BWAHAHAHA! Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill – a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses, just like the Health Care bill makes health care cheaper and better, too.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And some believe we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy – because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I am happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party – as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels. Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks. Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power. Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development – and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development. I'm happy to look at all other ideas as long as they follow my restricted outlook. NO nukes!

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fear hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction, unless its me. Then its called.........something....oh yes, pondering the complex problems of the day. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is too big and too difficult to meet. You see, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. And that's why I cut the Space Program and I'm killing industries. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is our capacity to shape our destiny – our determination to fight for the America we want for our children, unless it disagrees with MY vision for America. Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don’t yet know precisely how to get there. We know we’ll get there.

It is a faith in the future that sustains us as a people. It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now. (That faith that clings bitterly to guns and the bible, that faith that knows that Presidential terms are only 4 years long....if we can only hang on....)

Each year, at the beginning of shrimping season, the region’s fishermen take part in a tradition that was brought to America long ago by fishing immigrants from Europe. It’s called “The Blessing of the Fleet,” and today it’s a celebration where clergy from different religions gather to say a prayer for the safety and success of the men and women who will soon head out to sea – some for weeks at a time.

The ceremony goes on in good times and in bad. It took place after Katrina, and it took place a few weeks ago – at the beginning of the most difficult season these fishermen have ever faced.

And still, they came and they prayed. For as a priest and former fisherman once said of the tradition, “The blessing is not that God has promised to remove all obstacles and dangers. The blessing is that He is with us always,” a blessing that’s granted “…even in the midst of the storm.”

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face. This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again. I will make sure of that. What sees us through – what has always seen us through – is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it. Tonight, we pray for that courage. We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.

The Seas Have Ceased to Rise

I was told that if Obama was elected, the seas would cease to rise.


And they were RIGHT!



h/t Instapundit

Correct Policy - Disappointing Speech

Barnes: A Disappointing Speech in Support of the Right Policy

President Obama’s speech on Afghanistan was disappointing. Yes, the policy is right: more troops, a counter-insurgency strategy, a stronger alliance with Pakistan. But the personal commitment of the president to pursue the war against the Taliban and al Qaeda until they are defeated was not there. Obama did not take ownership of the war. It’s still the war in Afghanistan, not Obama’s War.

Maybe the president wants it that way. It may keep him from experiencing the fate of Lyndon Johnson, whose presidency suffered -- indeed was all but destroyed -- by his failure in Vietnam. But it will also keep him from gaining the vindication that George Bush has earned for his decision to order a “surge” that allowed America to prevail in Iraq.

I had hoped Obama would declare that nothing will deter him, as commander-in-chief, from prevailing in Afghanistan. But it turns out a lot of things might deter him. He listed a few of them: the cost of the war, its length (if more than 18 months from January 2010), the failure of Afghans to step up to the task sufficiently. He hedged.
Americans and our allies were looking for more, I believe. To have rallied the country and the world, Obama needed to indicate he would lead a fight to win in Afghanistan,
with the help of allies if possible, but with the armed forces of the U.S. alone if necessary. He didn’t say anything like that. He didn’t come close.

The result of the speech, I suspect, will be stagnant but still poor poll numbers here. He may have halted the downward drift of public support for the war for the time being. I doubt he persuaded any NATO countries to deploy more combat troops. Since he didn’t give a number -- 10,000 has been used by his aides -- he must not except very many to be offered.

I couldn’t be the only person who thought Obama once again both scapegoated and slighted George W. Bush. Early on in his administration, Obama recalled that he had agreed to a “longstanding request for more troops” in Afghanistan, implying that Bush had turned that request down. I don’t think that’s quite accurate.

And Obama praised the military for the success of the “surge” in Iraq without mentioning the person who -- against the advice of nearly everyone in Washington -- ordered that troop increase, Bush. Obama tacitly acknowledged the surge had worked, though he didn’t seem to remember that he’d insisted that it would worsen conditions in Iraq.

Despite the shortcomings of the speech, Obama made the right policy decision. He deserves credit for that. It won’t go down well with the antiwar, pacifist left wing of his party. That’s not only his base. It’s his political home. Up to now, the president hadn’t done anything to upset any of the constituency groups of the Democratic party. Now he has. Thank heavens for that.

Obama's speech - fisked so you don't have to.....

Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people:
(Well, he's not lying yet.)

When I spoke here last winter, this nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month. Credit was frozen. And our financial system was on the verge of collapse. (And its gotten worse.)

As any American who is still looking for work or a way to pay their bills will tell you, we are by no means out of the woods. A full and vibrant recovery is still many months away. (But you said that we had turned a corner.) And I will not let up until those Americans who seek jobs can find them until those businesses that seek capital and credit can thrive; until all responsible homeowners can stay in their homes. (Then why is Barney Frank still not investigated. Why is ACORN in getting tax money? Why is Freddie/Fannie not audited?) That is our ultimate goal. But thanks to the bold and decisive action we've taken since January, (Bold and decisive? Everything kicks in in 2010 or beyond.) I can stand here with confidence and say that we have pulled this economy back from the brink. (The brink of what? Everything is worse than you predicted. Its still tanking.)

I want to thank the members of this body for your efforts and your support in these last several months, and especially those who've taken the difficult votes that have put us on a path to recovery. I also want to thank the American people for their patience and resolve during this trying time for our nation. (Patience and resolve? Our patience has run out and we are resolved to let Congress know about it. Look at YOUR approval rating. )

But we did not come here just to clean up crises. (Of course not. You have to be able to take advantage of it.) We came here to build a future. So tonight, I return to speak to all of you about an issue that is central to that future -- and that is the issue of health care.

I am not the first President to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last. (PLEASE BE THE LAST) It has now been nearly a century since Theodore Roosevelt first called for health care reform. And ever since, nearly every President and Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, has attempted to meet this challenge in some way. A bill for comprehensive health reform was first introduced by John Dingell Sr. in 1943. Sixty-five years later, his son continues to introduce that same bill at the beginning of each session. (AND IT STILL SUCKS. NO NEW IDEAS SINCE)

Our collective failure to meet this challenge -- year after year, decade after decade -- has led us to the breaking point (So isn't it about time to realize that socialism doesn't work?). Everyone understands the extraordinary hardships that are placed on the uninsured, who live every day just one accident or illness away from bankruptcy. These are not primarily people on welfare. These are middle-class Americans. Some can't get insurance on the job. Others are self-employed, and can't afford it, since buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer (Because the gov't likes it that way). Many other Americans who are willing and able to pay are still denied insurance due to previous illnesses or conditions that insurance companies decide are too risky or too expensive to cover. (Because their are no incentive to do so.)

We are the only democracy -- the only advanced democracy on Earth -- the only wealthy nation -- that allows such hardship for millions of its people.(Yep, the others are worse.) There are now more than 30 million American citizens who cannot get coverage (Where did 17 million Americans go?). In just a two-year period, one in every three Americans goes without health care coverage at some point. And every day, 14,000 Americans lose their coverage. In other words, it can happen to anyone. (5,110,000 per year? So, according to your math, we've only had people lose coverage for the last 6 years?)

But the problem that plagues the health care system is not just a problem for the uninsured. Those who do have insurance have never had less security and stability than they do today. More and more Americans worry that if you move, lose your job, or change your job, you'll lose your health insurance too (Another gov't caused problem). More and more Americans pay their premiums, only to discover that their insurance company has dropped their coverage when they get sick, or won't pay the full cost of care (And gov't rationing will improve this how?). It happens every day.

One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn't reported gallstones that he didn't even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it. Another woman from Texas was about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne (and a rapid heartbeat. Ya think they might like to know about that. Don't lie on an application). By the time she had her insurance reinstated, her breast cancer had more than doubled in size. That is heart-breaking, it is wrong, and no one should be treated that way in the United States of America.

Then there's the problem of rising cost(NOW WE GET TO THE REAL REASON). We spend one and a half times more per person on health care than any other country, but we aren't any healthier for it (Tell that to the cancer survivors). This is one of the reasons that insurance premiums have gone up three times faster than wages (How so? Non sequitur). It's why so many employers -- especially small businesses -- are forcing their employees to pay more for insurance (Its called capitalism, look it up.), or are dropping their coverage entirely. It's why so many aspiring entrepreneurs cannot afford to open a business in the first place, and why American businesses that compete internationally(and our taxes and requlations) -- like our automakers (Unions demand the perks) -- are at a huge disadvantage. And it's why those of us with health insurance are also paying a hidden and growing tax for those without it -- about $1,000 per year that pays for somebody else's emergency room and charitable care (Really? How about trying to end illegal immigration? And making it ALL paid for by the government is supposed to bring down these costs how?.

Finally, our health care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers. When health care costs grow at the rate they have, it puts greater pressure on programs like Medicare and Medicaid. If we do nothing to slow these skyrocketing costs, we will eventually be spending more on Medicare and Medicaid than every other government program combined. Put simply, our health care problem is our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close. Nothing else. (How are our PRIVATE costs adding to our deficit? NOW the reason surfaces. Our expanding Medicare/Medicaid debt. So, we can't pay a 56 TRILLION dollar debt for Medicare so we're going to add to it by spending almost ANOTHER TRILLION per year on more government run health care.)

Now, these are the facts. Nobody disputes them. We know we must reform this system. The question is how.

There are those on the left who believe that the only way to fix the system is through a single-payer system like Canada's -- (applause) (This proves that the liberals want single payer.) -- where we would severely restrict the private insurance market and have the government provide coverage for everybody. On the right, there are those who argue that we should end employer-based systems and leave individuals to buy health insurance on their own.

I've said -- I have to say that there are arguments to be made for both these approaches (But you are only applying one). But either one would represent a radical shift that would disrupt the health care most people currently have. Since health care represents one-sixth of our economy, I believe it makes more sense to build on what works and fix what doesn't, rather than try to build an entirely new system from scratch (Hypocrite. Lying hypocrite). And that is precisely what those of you in Congress have tried to do over the past several months. (Yep build a new one from scratch)

During that time, we've seen Washington at its best (HA!) and at its worst.

We've seen many in this chamber work tirelessly for the better part of this year to offer thoughtful ideas about how to achieve reform (WHEN?! THEY DIDN'T READ IT OR WRITE IT). Of the five committees asked to develop bills (ALREADY WRITTEN BY SPECIAL INTERESTS YEARS AGO), four have completed their work, and the Senate Finance Committee announced today that it will move forward next week. That has never happened before (WHAT? It happened in July.). Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses; hospitals, seniors' groups, and even drug companies -- many of whom opposed reform in the past (Bribes work wonders). And there is agreement (hopefully only on the Dem side) in this chamber on about 80 percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform than we have ever been. (But they don't agree on the same 80%)

But what we've also seen in these last months is the same partisan spectacle that only hardens the disdain many Americans have towards their own government.(No, what hardens the hearts of Americans was THE DISDAIN SHOWN THEM!) Instead of honest debate, we've seen scare tactics (FROM YOU). Some have dug into unyielding ideological camps (YOU AGAIN) that offer no hope of compromise(PELOSI AND REID). Too many have used this as an opportunity to score short-term political points (ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY), even if it robs the country of our opportunity to solve a long-term challenge. And out of this blizzard of charges and counter-charges, confusion has reigned (NO confusion except on the part of politicians who never expected resistance).

Well, the time for bickering(BICKERING! BICKERING? YOU CALL THE RAGE OF CITIZENS "BICKERING" WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO LECTURE US? YOU, WHO ADVOCATES GETTING IN PEOPLE'S FACES! FUCK YOU!) is over. The time for games has passed. (GAMES? YOUR WHOLE SPEECH IS PART OF THE GAME. THE PACKING OF TOWN HALLS WITH YOUR THUGS IS THE GAME. YOU'RE JUST UPSET THAT WE'RE LEARNING THE RULES.) Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together(YOU HAVE TO INVITE THE GOP FIRST), and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care. Now is the time to deliver on health care. (SHOW ME IN THE CONSTITUTION WHERE ITS LEGAL.)

The plan I'm announcing tonight would meet three basic goals. It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance for those who don't. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government. (So we get better insurance, more insurance, no one can be denied, and its cheaper? You never got off the drugs, huh?) It's a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge -- not just government, not just insurance companies, but everybody including employers and individuals. And it's a plan that incorporates ideas from senators and congressmen, from Democrats and Republicans(Bullshit)-- and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election.

Here are the details (EXCEPT THAT WE SEE NO DETAILS! JUST PLATITUDES!) that every American needs to know about this plan. First, if you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. (LIE)Let me repeat this: Nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have. (Repeating a LIE DOES NOT MAKE IT TRUE - IF THE PLAN CHANGES AT ALL YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT PROCESS)

What this plan will do is make the insurance you have work better for you. Under this plan, it will be against the law for insurance companies to deny you coverage because of a preexisting condition. (And you say it will be cheaper? You are either an idiot or LYING.) As soon as I sign this bill, it will be against the law for insurance companies to drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it the most. They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or in a lifetime. We will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they get sick. And insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies because there's no reason we shouldn't be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives. (SO, LIKE THE COAL COMPANIES, THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS. IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN INSURANCE COMPANY TO ADDRESS INCREASED RISK, THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS. Which is what you want.)

Now, that's what Americans who have health insurance can expect from this plan -- more security and more stability.

Now, if you're one of the tens of millions of Americans who don't currently have health insurance, the second part of this plan will finally offer you quality, affordable choices. If you lose your job or you change your job, you'll be able to get coverage. If you strike out on your own and start a small business, you'll be able to get coverage. We'll do this by creating a new insurance exchange -- a marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to shop for health insurance at competitive prices. (They already have this. Its called the internet.) Insurance companies will have an incentive to participate in this exchange because it lets them compete for millions of new customers. As one big group, these customers will have greater leverage to bargain with the insurance companies for better prices and quality coverage. (Really? One big group spread out over multiple companies? Like we have now?) This is how large companies and government employees get affordable insurance. It's how everyone in this Congress gets affordable insurance. (Its called the Law of Large Numbers and its affected by the type of members within certain groups) And it's time to give every American the same opportunity that we give ourselves. (You can say that again. Just put everyone on the plan that Congress has. If your new plan is so good, why won't Congress use it? Or the unions?)

Now, for those individuals and small businesses who still can't afford the lower-priced insurance available in the exchange, we'll provide tax credits, the size of which will be based on your need (How about just CUTTING TAXES!). And all insurance companies that want access to this new marketplace will have to abide by the consumer protections I already mentioned. This exchange will take effect in four years (WHICH GIVES YOU AND CONGRESS TIME TO GET RE-ELECTED AND THE PEOPLE TO FORGET WHO VOTED FOR WHAT), which will give us time to do it right(Apparently, the "crisis" isn't really all that urgent, you know like the stimulus package). In the meantime, for those Americans who can't get insurance today because they have preexisting medical conditions, we will immediately offer low-cost coverage that will protect you against financial ruin if you become seriously ill. This was a good idea when Senator John McCain proposed it in the campaign, it's a good idea now, and we should all embrace it. (And this is why John McCain isn't President.....)

Now, even if we provide these affordable options, there may be those -- especially the young and the healthy -- who still want to take the risk and go without coverage. There may still be companies that refuse to do right by their workers by giving them coverage. The problem is, such irresponsible behavior costs all the rest of us money (THEN DON'T PAY FOR IT! THIS IS NOT A COLLECTIVE.). If there are affordable options and people still don't sign up for health insurance, it means we pay for these people's (Illegal aliens, part of those 17 million that mysterious disappered.) expensive emergency room visits (NO, IT MEANS THEY DO OR GO BROKE. ITS CALLED A BILL). If some businesses don't provide workers health care, it forces the rest of us to pick up the tab when their workers get sick, and gives those businesses an unfair advantage over their competitors (THE GOV'T MADE THE RULES.). And unless everybody does their part (WHO ARE YOU TO SAY WHAT MY PART IS? YOU WORK FOR ME!), many of the insurance reforms we seek -- especially requiring insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions -- just can't be achieved. (As a father with a diabetic child, I can relate. But there are free market incentives that can be done to fix this. Or state laws. )

And that's why under my plan ( WHAT PLAN? YOU DON'T HAVE A PLAN! WHERE IS IT AND WHERE CAN WE READ IT!), individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance -- just as most states require you to carry auto insurance. Likewise -- likewise, businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the cost of their workers. There will be a hardship waiver for those individuals who still can't afford coverage, and 95 percent of all small businesses, because of their size and narrow profit margin, would be exempt from these requirements. (So its NOT necessary for all of us to "do our part"?) But we can't have large businesses (define "large") and individuals who can afford coverage game the system by avoiding responsibility (like paying for food or shelter, you know, unimportant things.) to themselves or their employees. Improving our health care system only works if everybody does their part. (So you're going to fine me because I don't have health care insurance because I'm unemployed because of Democratic policies that killed my industry. Besides, where in the Constitution does it say that the government has the power to make me BUY anything? Including Car insurance? Just because they do it does not make it right.)

And while there remain some significant details to be ironed out, I believe -- (laughter) (Its not a laughing matter! Congress was supposed to VOTE AND PASS this LAST MONTH AND YOU WERE GOING TO SIGN IT - SIGHT UNSEEN!)-- I believe a broad consensus exists (THAT YOU ARE EITHER LYING AGAIN OR AN INCOMPETENT)for the aspects of the plan I just outlined: consumer protections for those with insurance, an exchange that allows individuals and small businesses to purchase affordable coverage, and a requirement that people who can afford insurance get insurance. (And for this you want to gut and change our existing system?)

And I have no doubt that these reforms would greatly benefit Americans from all walks of life, as well as the economy as a whole (Of course not. YOU can't be wrong.). Still, given all the misinformation (so you're calling citizens that read the bill liars?) that's been spread over the past few months (See all of the above speech and all the other speeches and the information put out by Congress.), I realize -- (applause) -- I realize that many Americans have grown nervous about reform (No joke, Sherlock. What gave you a clue? Oh. Wait. Something about a Tea Party.....). So tonight I want to address some of the key controversies that are still out there.

Some of people's concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost (That would be those that respect the Constitution). The best example is the claim made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but by prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren't so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple. (Except that these non-existent panels were REMOVED from a bill. And, of course, rationing because you're too old and expensive is another way to kill you.)
There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms -- the reforms I'm proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: You lie! (Boos.) (Go Congressman Joe Wilson!)

THE PRESIDENT: It's not true.(Lie)And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place. (Really. Apparently YOU haven't seen the bill.)

Now, my health care proposal has also been attacked by some who oppose reform as a "government takeover" of the entire health care system. As proof (See your own freaking statements, Rangel's statements, and other statements by Democrats), critics point to a provision in our plan that allows the uninsured and small businesses to choose a publicly sponsored insurance option (which will kill all competing plans by not needing to be profitable and therefore become "single payer"), administered by the government just like Medicaid or Medicare (Oh. THOSE paragons of thrift and efficiency. Great. Just what we need....).

So let me set the record straight here. My guiding principle is, and always has been, that (I WON AND YOU HAD BETTER GET USED TO IT. ITS MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY.) consumers do better when there is choice and competition. That's how the market works. (Where did you read that? I know you don't believe it.) Unfortunately, in 34 states, 75 percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies. (AND THAT'S DUE TO GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE) In Alabama, almost 90 percent is controlled by just one company. And without competition, the price of insurance goes up and quality goes down (See SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE. THANKS FOR MAKING MY POINT). And it makes it easier for insurance companies to treat their customers badly -- by cherry-picking the healthiest individuals and trying to drop the sickest, by overcharging small businesses who have no leverage, and by jacking up rates. (And THAT is Obama's plan on single payer.)

Insurance executives don't do this because they're bad people; they do it because it's profitable. As one former insurance executive testified before Congress, insurance companies are not only encouraged to find reasons to drop the seriously ill, they are rewarded for it. All of this is in service of meeting what this former executive called "Wall Street's relentless profit expectations." (So, you'll do it because of rationing. "Take a pain pill, Grandma.")

Now, I have no interest in putting insurance companies out of business(LIE! Just like you love the coal companies.) They provide a legitimate service, and employ a lot of our friends and neighbors. I just want to hold them accountable. (So, who would hold un-elected bureaucrats accountable?) And the insurance reforms that I've already mentioned would do just that. But an additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange. (Most insurance are already not-for-profit. It was the Fed'l government that let some become for-profit.)Now, let me be clear. Let me be clear. (You couldn't be clear if you were made of glass.) It would only be an option for those who don't have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it (until their insurance changed or their provider went broke, or their employer went to the cheaper gov't plan.), and it would not impact those of you who already have insurance. In fact, based on Congressional Budget Office estimates, we believe that less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up. (So then, we won't get those 30 million, um 47 million, whatever...into cheap insurance? I thought that it was a crisis. Liar. If you are only going to get 1.5 million or LESS into the program, what's the point?)

Despite all this, the insurance companies and their allies don't like this idea. They argue that these private companies can't fairly compete with the government. And they'd be right if taxpayers were subsidizing this public insurance option. But they won't be. (Bullshit. Lie! If one company can safely go into deficit spending, then they win.) I've insisted that like any private insurance company, the public insurance option would have to be self-sufficient and rely on the premiums it collects. But by avoiding some of the overhead that gets eaten up at private companies by profits and excessive administrative costs and executive salaries, it could provide a good deal for consumers, and would also keep pressure on private insurers (you mean, like other not-for-profits?) to keep their policies affordable (by even more rationing) and treat their customers better (better than what, the IRS? You forgot to mention that the IRS is going to be intimately involved in this scheme.), the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities. (Except no one is forced to go to a public college or fined for not getting a degree.)

Now, it is -- it's worth noting that a strong majority of Americans still favor a public insurance option of the sort I've proposed tonight(Bullshit. Rasmussen shows 52% AGAINST). But its impact shouldn't be exaggerated -- by the left or the right or the media (REDUNDANT. He already mentioned the Left.). It is only one part of my plan, and shouldn't be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles (ONE PART! ALL THIS AND THERE'S MORE? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?). To my progressive friends, I would remind you that for decades, the driving idea behind reform has been to end insurance company abuses and make coverage available for those without it. The public option -- the public option is only a means to that end (single payer health care, google Rangel) -- and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal. And to my Republican friends, I say that rather than making wild claims about a government takeover of health care, we should work together to address any legitimate concerns you may have. (THAT is the concern, you statist corrupt Chicago politican!)

For example -- for example, some have suggested that the public option go into effect only in those markets where insurance companies are not providing affordable policies. Others have proposed a co-op or another non-profit entity to administer the plan. These are all constructive ideas worth exploring. But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can't find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice. And I will make sure that no government bureaucrat or insurance company bureaucrat gets between you and the care that you need. (Except those bureaucrats that will need to ration the care.)

Finally, let me discuss an issue that is a great concern to me, to members of this chamber, and to the public -- and that's how we pay for this plan. (PAY FOR THE PLAN? YOU CAN'T PAY FOR MEDICARE! YOU'RE BUYING UP OUR NATIONAL DEBT NOW! LYING POS!)

And here's what you need to know. First, I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits -- either now or in the future. (THEN I GUESS HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH BECAUSE NOTHING IS GOING TO PASS.) I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I'm serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don't materialize. (GOOD BY DEFENSE BUDGET. AND REMEMBER HOW MANY OTHER PROMISES THAT HE'S KEPT! WHY, HE'S, no....OH, HE'S ....no, he broke that one, too.....) Now, part of the reason I faced a trillion-dollar deficit(LIE, IT WAS 453BILLION. HE MADE IT A 1.5 TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT.) when I walked in the door of the White House is because too many initiatives over the last decade were not paid for(LIKE MEDICARE, MEDICAID, FREDDIE, FANNIE, ETC.) -- from the Iraq war to tax breaks for the wealthy. I will not make that same mistake with health care.

Second, we've estimated that most of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health care system (GUTTING MEDICARE. THAT'S THE ONLY SYSTEM THE GOVERNMENT HAS.), a system that is currently full of waste and abuse (AND YOU THINK INCREASING THE SIZE AND COMPLEXITY OF THE SYSTEM IS THE WAY TO FIX IT? FOOL.). Right now, too much of the hard-earned savings and tax dollars we spend on health care don't make us any healthier (YOU KNOW, EXCEPT WHEN IT SAVES OUR LIVES.). That's not my judgment -- it's the judgment of medical professionals across this country. And this is also true when it comes to Medicare and Medicaid. (RATIONING ALERT)

In fact, I want to speak directly to seniors for a moment, because Medicare is another issue that's been subjected to demagoguery and distortion during the course of this debate.

More than four decades ago, this nation stood up for the principle that after a lifetime of hard work, our seniors should not be left to struggle with a pile of medical bills in their later years. That's how Medicare was born. And it remains a sacred trust that must be passed down from one generation to the next. And that is why not a dollar of the Medicare trust fund will be used to pay for this plan. (so what health care system will the government "find saving within" if not the ONLY government plan." Its IN THE BILLS! READ THE BILLS.)

The only thing this plan would eliminate is the hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and fraud (DO THAT FIRST AND THEN WE'LL BELIEVE YOU), as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare that go to insurance companies (YOU MEAN LIKE MY MOTHER'S SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH CARE PLAN FOR THINGS THAT MEDICARE WOULDN'T PAY FOR AND SHE COULDN'T AFFORD?) -- subsidies that do everything to pad their profits but don't improve the care of seniors.(Tell that to my mom who had an emergency bypass at 73. YOU would prescribe a pain pill!) And we will also create an independent commission of doctors and medical experts charged with identifying more waste in the years ahead.(LIKE BYPASSES FOR 73 YEAR OLDS?)

Now, these steps will ensure that you -- America's seniors -- get the benefits you've been promised. They will ensure that Medicare is there for future generations. (THIS IS WHY WE'VE HAD TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THIS. ITS ALL ABOUT "SAVING MEDICARE WITHOUT LOSING VOTES.") And we can use some of the savings to fill the gap in coverage that forces too many seniors to pay thousands of dollars a year out of their own pockets for prescription drugs. (We already have that. Its called the Prescription Drug Plan.) That's what this plan will do for you. So don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut (since that makes you vote for the GOP!), especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past and just this year supported a budget that would essentially have turned Medicare into a privatized voucher program (Which was supported by many.). That will not happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare. (Except when you gut it.)

Now, because Medicare is such a big part of the health care system, making the program more efficient can help usher in changes in the way we deliver health care that can reduce costs for everybody. We have long known that some places -- like the Intermountain Healthcare in Utah or the Geisinger Health System in rural Pennsylvania -- offer high-quality care at costs below average. So the commission can help encourage the adoption of these common-sense best practices by doctors and medical professionals throughout the system -- everything from reducing hospital infection rates to encouraging better coordination between teams of doctors.

Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan. (56 TRILLION IN UNSECURED DEBT! THAT'S ALOT OF WASTE AND INEFFICIENCY.) Now, much of the rest would be paid for with revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies that stand to benefit from tens of millions of new customers.( NOTHING. GOV'T PAYOUTS AREN'T HIGH ENOUGH. THAT'S WHY DOCTORS ARE NOT ACCEPTING MEDICARE.) And this reform will charge insurance companies a fee for their most expensive policies, which will encourage them to (PASS ON THAT FEE TO CUSTOMERS) provide greater value for the money -- an idea which has the support of Democratic and Republican experts.(NAME ONE.)And according to these same experts, this modest change could help hold down the cost of health care for all of us in the long run.

Now, finally, many in this chamber -- particularly on the Republican side of the aisle -- have long insisted that reforming our medical malpractice laws can help bring down the cost of health care. Now -- there you go. There you go. Now, I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I've talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs. So I'm proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine. I know that the Bush administration considered authorizing demonstration projects in individual states to test these ideas. I think it's a good idea, and I'm directing my Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on this initiative today. (So its ok to transform our ENTIRE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, but tort reform is going to be small demonstration projects in individual states...... Why don't we reverse that....)

Now, add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (except THOSE are part of the duties found in the Constitution.), and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration. (Its their money.) Now, most of these costs will be paid for with money already being spent -- but spent badly (by the same government that says it can spend wisely- See the Cash for Clunkers pro...no wait....the Stimul....nope, not that, TARP!, ...nope. Post Off.....still, no...) -- in the existing health care system. The plan will not add to our deficit. (LIE)The middle class will realize greater security, not higher taxes (LIE). And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year -- one-tenth of 1 percent -- it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term. (WHOSE HEALTH CARE COSTS? SHOW THE NUMBERS AND THE SOURCES.)

Now, this is the plan I'm proposing. It's a plan that incorporates ideas from many of the people in this room tonight -- Democrats and Republicans (LIE). And I will continue to seek common ground (HUGE FREAKING LIE!) in the weeks ahead. If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen (AND LAUGH WHEN YOU LEAVE). My door is always open (I'M JUST NOT THERE).

But know this: I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better politics to kill this plan than to improve it. (SO HERE IS THE PROOF THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE IS A LIE. WHAT IF WE DECIDE YOUR POWER GRAB IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL? In other words, "everybody that disagrees, PISS OFF!") I won't stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. (you mean, the citizens?) If you misrepresent what's in this plan, we will call you out (Bring it bitch. Why not read it this time?). And I will not -- and I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now. (Wish you'd talk this tough to our enemies. Oh, wait, those are your buddies......)

Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing. Our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it the most. And more will die as a result. We know these things to be true. (All of this will happen as long as you are in office. What was that about "scare tactics?")

That is why we cannot fail. Because there are too many Americans counting on us to succeed -- the ones who suffer silently, and the ones who shared their stories with us at town halls (the ones that demanded that you STOP?), in e-mails, and in letters.

I received one of those letters a few days ago. It was from our beloved friend and colleague, Ted Kennedy. He had written it back in May, shortly after he was told that his illness was terminal. He asked that it be delivered upon his death. (Yep, his idea of health care was walk home after running off a bridge and leaving someone to die.)

In it, he spoke about what a happy time his last months were(cracking jokes about Mary Jo Kopechne), thanks to the love and support of family and friends, his wife, Vicki, his amazing children, who are all here tonight. And he expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform -- "that great unfinished business of our society," he called it -- would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that "it concerns more than material things." "What we face," he wrote, "is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country." (Ol' Teddy could care less about that. He was a low down piece of crap.)

I've thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days -- the character of our country. One of the unique and wonderful things about America has always been our self-reliance, our rugged individualism, our fierce defense of freedom and our healthy skepticism of government. And figuring out the appropriate size and role of government has always been a source of rigorous and, yes, sometimes angry debate. That's our history. (And THAT'S WHAT HAS TO CHANGE! according to you)

For some of Ted Kennedy's critics, his brand of liberalism represented an affront to American liberty. In their minds, his passion for universal health care was nothing more than a passion for big government. (No, his passion for big government, including universal health care was an affront. Actually, HE was the affront to American liberty. )

But those of us who knew Teddy and worked with him here -- people of both parties -- know that what drove him was something more. (Good scotch, cheap hookers.) His friend Orrin Hatch -- he knows that. They worked together to provide children with health insurance. His friend John McCain knows that (Not a good source if you want Republican help.). They worked together on a Patient's Bill of Rights (Which will never make it across your desk.). His friend Chuck Grassley knows that. They worked together to provide health care to children with disabilities.

On issues like these, Ted Kennedy's passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick. And he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance, what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent, there is something that could make you better, but I just can't afford it.

That large-heartedness -- that concern and regard for the plight of others -- is not a partisan feeling. It's not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character -- our ability to stand in other people's shoes; a recognition that we are all in this together, and when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand; a belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgment that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise. (That's called CHARITY. NOT GOVERNMENT DEPENDENCY)

This has always been the history of our progress. In 1935, when over half of our seniors could not support themselves and millions had seen their savings wiped away (By FDR's mismanagement and incompetence), there were those who argued that Social Security would lead to socialism ( It is. Its being used as the precedent.), but the men and women of Congress stood fast (AND WE WENT BROKE FASTER AS THOSE SAME DEMOCRATS STOLE THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND AND PUT IT INTO THE GENERAL FUND.), and we are all the better for it. In 1965, when some argued that Medicare represented a government takeover of health care (It was. It killed the market for "gasp" medical insurance for seniors), members of Congress -- Democrats and Republicans -- did not back down. They joined together so that all of us could enter our golden years with some basic peace of mind.

You see, our predecessors understood that government could not, and should not, solve every problem. (Yet YOU and the liberals keep trying.) They understood that there are instances when the gains in security from government action are not worth the added constraints on our freedom. (Yet that doesn't stop you.) But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy (is that the same "wise policy" that deepened this and the Great Depression?), markets can crash, monopolies (like single payer health care?) can stifle competition, the vulnerable can be exploited (like the blacks, hispanics, and the poor?). And they knew that when any government measure, no matter how carefully crafted or beneficial, is subject to scorn; when any efforts to help people in need are attacked as un-American; when facts and reason are thrown overboard and only timidity passes for wisdom, and we can no longer even engage in a civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter -- that at that point we don't merely lose our capacity to solve big challenges. We lose something essential about ourselves. (True, so compromise. You go first. Stop seizing powers that are not found in the Constitution.)

That was true then. It remains true today. I understand how difficult this health care debate has been. I know that many in this country are deeply skeptical that government is looking out for them. I understand that the politically safe move would be to kick the can further down the road -- to defer reform one more year, or one more election, or one more term. (Well, as long as YOU aren't the President........)

But that is not what the moment calls for. That's not what we came here to do. We did not come to fear the future (I fear the present. We can only affect the present.). We came here to shape it. I still believe we can act even when it's hard. I still believe -- I still believe that we can act when it's hard. I still believe we can replace acrimony with civility, and gridlock with progress. I still believe we can do great things, and that here and now we will meet history's test.

Because that's who we are. That is our calling. That is our character. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.


Whew! O.M.G. he's a bloviating sack of crap! I thought Clinton was bad....