Saturday, June 20, 2009

Buy Gold or Silver

Washington is unable to call all the shots
By Michael Hudson

Challenging the American empire will be the focus of meetings in Yekaterinburg, Russia, today and tomorrow for Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other leaders of the six-nation Shanghai Co-operation Organisation. The alliance comprises Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajiki-stan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, with observer status for Iran, India, Pakistan and Mongolia.

The attendees (who will be joined on Tuesday by Brazil for trade discussions) have assured American diplomats that dismantling the US financial and military hegemony is not their aim. They simply want to discuss mutual aid - but in a way that has no role for the US or for the dollar as a vehicle for trade among these countries.

The meeting is an opportunity for China, Russia and India to "build an increasingly multipolar world order", as Mr Medvedev put it in a St Petersburg speech this month. What he meant was this: we have reached our limit in subsidising the US military encirclement of Eurasia while also allowing the US to appropriate our exports, companies and real estate in exchange for paper money of questionable worth.

An "artificially maintained unipolar system", Mr Medvedev said, was based on "one big centre of consumption, financed by a growing deficit, and thus growing debts, one formerly strong reserve currency, and one dominant system of assessing assets and risks".

Keen observers of America, if not effective managers of their own economies, these countries argue that the root of the global financial crisis is that the US makes too little and spends too much. Especially upsetting is US military expenditure - such as military aid to Georgia or the presence in the oil-rich Middle East and central Asia - using money that foreign central banks recycle.

Overconsumption by US citizens, US buy-outs of foreign companies and dollars the Pentagon spends abroad all end up in foreign central banks. These governments face a hard choice: either recycle the dollars back to America by buying US Treasury bonds or let the "free market" force up their currencies relative to the dollar - thereby pricing their exports out of world markets, creating domestic unemployment and business failures. US-style free markets hook them into a system that forces them to accept unlimited dollars. Now they want out.

This means creating an alternative. Rather than making merely "cosmetic changes as some countries and perhaps the international financial organisations themselves might want", Mr Medvedev concluded his St Petersburg speech: "What we need are financial institutions of a completely new type, where particular political issues and motives, and particular countries, will not dominate."

For starters, the six countries intend to trade in their own currencies so as to get the benefit of mutual credit, rather than give it to the US. In recent months China has struck bilateral deals with Brazil and Malaysia to trade in renminbi rather than the dollar, sterling or euros.

Many foreigners see the US as a lawless nation. How else to characterise a country that holds out a set of laws for others - on war, debt repayment and the treatment of prisoners - but ignores them itself?

The US is the world's largest debtor, yet has avoided the pain of "structural adjustments" imposed on other debtor nations. US interest rate and tax reductions in the face of exploding trade and budget deficits are seen as the height of hypocrisy in view of the austerity programmes that the "Washington consensus" has forced on other countries via the International Monetary Fund and other vehicles. The US tells debtor economies to sell off their public utilities and natural resources, raise their interest rates and increase taxes while gutting their social safety nets to squeeze out money to pay creditors.

It is no mystery to other countries how the US remains above the law. Foreigners see a financial system backed by American aircraft carriers and military bases encircling the globe. The IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organisation and other Washington surrogates are seen as vestiges of a lost American empire no longer able to rule by economic strength, left only with military domination.

The countries that are gathering today are convinced that this hegemony cannot continue without adequate revenues and are attempting to hasten the bankruptcy of the US financial-military world order. If China, Russia and their allies have their way, the US will no longer live off the savings of others, nor have the money for unlimited military spending.

US officials wanted to attend Yekaterinburg as observers. They were told no. It is a word that Americans will hear much more in the future.

The writer is professor of economics at the University of Missouri

From Gold is Money

Labels: , ,

|

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Obama has declared that the WAR is over.

All actions now will be considered law enforcement. Captured enemy combatants will be given Miranda warnings.

The Obama Justice Department has quietly ordered FBI agents to read Miranda rights to high value detainees captured and held at U.S. detention facilities in Afghanistan, according a senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. “The administration has decided to change the focus to law enforcement. Here’s the problem. You have foreign fighters who are targeting US troops today – foreign fighters who go to another country to kill Americans. We capture them…and they’re reading them their rights – Mirandizing these foreign fighters,” says Representative Mike Rogers, who recently met with military, intelligence and law enforcement officials on a fact-finding trip to Afghanistan.

We are SO screwed. Can we impeach this son of a bitch yet? For providing aid and comfort to the enemy?

QandO and Gateway Pundit have more.

I'm too angry and disgusted to follow up on this.

Labels: , , ,

|

If Bush had screwed up

this badly, the press would have....oh. Wait. They did even when he DIDN'T screw up.

Obama flunks simple history even worse than I thought..........

Frank J. Tipler:

Almost every advance he attributed to the Muslims in his big speech should be credited to someone else.


Labels: , , ,

|

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Obama mocked in Turkey even while trying to "make nice"

Obama has been apologizing for America since, well, since the beginning of his career. He took it on the road last week. Everyone has heard him apologize for us. His faux pas have made the news every day.

He continues to trumpet his smart diplomacy shtick, most recently during his appeasement of the Turkish muslims. He was met with, suprise!, protests. And mockery. A newscaster in Turkey donned black face while criticising him. To them, I say Fuck Off. While I disagree with our President, and I will mock and disparage him, he is the AMERICAN President. Its my DUTY TO DO SO! And to the President, SHUT THE HELL UP! GET YOUR FRICKIN' A GAME ON OR FIND SOMEONE WHO CAN DO IT BETTER! ITS ONLY BEEN TWO EFF'N MONTHS AND YOU HAVE INSULTED OUR ALLIES, EMBARRASSED YOUR COUNTRY AND KOWTOWED TO THE SOURCE OF OUR WAR! GET A FUCKING CLUE ALREADY!

Labels:

|

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Fascism - the Face of Obama

A NEW ORDER HAS ARISEN!


The Dear Leader has just fired and replaced the head of a major corporation. And now we are hearing that GM may have to declare bankruptcy ANYWAY? Why doesn't Obama and co. get blamed for wasting billions of dollars on a failing corporation instead former CEO Wagoner. The administration was told repeatedly that GM would probably have declare bankruptcy months ago. But Obama and the democrats would not listen. THEY are the ones that are bankrupting the country.


That same Dear Leader has demanded that a major corporation be given to a foreign corporation for free. Chrysler was given 30 day to finalize any deal with Fiat or face the loss of billions in government aid. Fiat will assume a 35% (possibly raising to 55%) stake in the company, debt free. Why Fiat? Simple. Small cars. Supposedly Fiat will share technology with Chrysler enabling Chrysler to market fuel efficient cars. You know, similar to all those Fiats that you see Americans driving today.....Say goodbye to the Ferrari, Maserati, and the Alfa Romeo.......Can you see anyone buying a Chrysler Maserati?
How much of the bail out will be going to Fiat? Supposedly, Chrysler is to pay back the $6,000,000,000 that it will get as a result of this deal prior to Fiat assuming control of the company. (Fat chance.)

“Almost 95% of banks in this country remain well-capitalized. Since that time, many banks have been contacted by regulators, and urged, sometimes forcefully, to participate in the [Capital Purchase Program].”
If this is the case, that means that almost ALL banks will receive a portion of the TARP money, whether they want it or not. So, that means that Congress will control the wages of the executives of these companies also. Yet again, because of greed of Congress, Americans lose. Because Congress set taxes so high, yet allowed bonuses to be taxed at a lower rate, many executives take a low yearly salary and get paid year end bonuses as compensation. Not for performance, but, as a portion of their salary. Now, Congress wants to take this away from them.


Now that the financial institutions have taxpayer's money, certain Congressmen think that these employees should be paid like government bureaucrats. Of course, no Congressman ever gets rich from the taxpayer's money.....

Jon Jacobs:

Taxpayer are now like shareholders of your company. Indeed they are. Therefore it's no surprise to see taxpayers' elected representatives demand "their" management show accountability for major expenditures past and present.

Except that we are truly shareholders in our government, and THOSE employees refuse to be held accountable.

These officials evidently feel banks, once brought under the public umbrella, should be run not like businesses but like public agencies, where salaries are set by published charts rather than managers' discretion - and where bonuses don't exist. A great many voters seem to share that view. It all sounds fair - even logical. Until, that is, you stop to ponder what's the exit strategy. If every banker's pay is effectively subject to congressional review, who will want to work for banks?

I hope these people get good jobs in foreign firms.

Congress is blind. The conceited bastards running the circus evidently believe that being the head clown in the circus enables one to run the business end of it, too......

Please look at the above links and information with open eyes. Search the web for more info. And then come back and show me where I am wrong in believing that Obama and the Democrats in Congress are not, at the very least socialist, if not fascist.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Monday, March 23, 2009

China calls for new reserve currency

A trillion here, a trillion there....pretty soon it starts to add up. And our creditors have noticed. The US dollar is the world's reserve currency. This allows the US to borrow money heavily since other nations want to hold their reserves in our cash. Well, China has started to worry about the value of our dollar. Perhaps monetizing the debt isn't such a good thing....

China is calling for an independent reserve currency.
One not tied to a single country........hmmm, that would be us... Bet this won't make CNN. Or the New York Times.

China’s central bank on Monday proposed replacing the US dollar as the international reserve currency with a new global system controlled by the International Monetary Fund.

In an essay posted on the People’s Bank of China’s website, Zhou Xiaochuan, the central bank’s governor, said the goal would be to create a reserve currency “that is disconnected from individual nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies”.

Analysts said the proposal was an indication of Beijing’s fears that actions being taken to save the domestic US economy would have a negative impact on China.

“This is a clear sign that China, as the largest holder of US dollar financial assets, is concerned about the potential inflationary risk of the US Federal Reserve printing money,” said Qu Hongbin, chief China economist for HSBC.

I think I'll look into that "gold" thing...........

Labels: , , ,

|

Friday, March 13, 2009

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?


General Shinseki, the new Secretary of Veterans Affairs, should be asked to resign if he is even considering implementing this new idea of Obama's: Let Veterans pay for their treatment on service related injuries. President Obama wants vets to use their private insurance to reimburse the VA for treatment. Hmmmm, I ain't got no freaking insurance! His little economic adventures are extending my period of unemployment. So, do I have to pay cash before I get to see a doc?

I can understand that Obama comes from a liberal background with little exposure to the military. But this is ridiculous - he was a Senator. And he campaigned on the promises of improving veteran health care. Not only will this harm veterans financially, it will cause companies to rethink their hiring practices in regards to disabled vets. Those businesses will be holding the bag because their new employee will be an added cost. Insurance rates will rise.

He's sending 900 MILLION to HAMAS but he wants Vets to pay the govt for treatment.

Can we question his freaking patriotism YET?

h/t Hot Air

Labels: , , ,

|

Monday, March 09, 2009

The British Press respond to President Obama's gaffes

The Wonder Kid is overwhelmed. I thought that he was chosen over the Old One because of his youth and vigor, his ability to multi-task. His recent disastrous meeting with Gordon Brown has been critiqued by the Telegraph in the UK. They are SO polite over there. The knife slips in soooo quietly.......

Sources close to the White House say Mr Obama and his staff have been "overwhelmed" by the economic meltdown and have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.

The American source said: "Obama is overwhelmed. There is a zero sum tension between his ability to attend to the economic issues and his ability to be a proactive sculptor of the national security agenda.

President Bush is 15 years his senior and has been running a war. Heck, FDR was old, crippled, and had the Great Depression along with WWI. THIS is overwheming Obama?

Allies of Mr Obama say his weary appearance in the Oval Office with Mr Brown illustrates the strain he is now under, and the president's surprise at the sheer volume of business that crosses his desk.
"I think he can be ready, but right now I don't believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training." Nuff' said on that.

A well-connected Washington figure, who is close to members of Mr Obama's inner circle, expressed concern that Mr Obama had failed so far to "even fake an interest in foreign policy".

Where's the outcry about Bush's, I mean, Obama's lack of interest in foreign policy? Wasn't this the President that was going to engage the world?

The real views of many in Obama administration were laid bare by a State Department official involved in planning the Brown visit, who reacted with fury when questioned by The Sunday Telegraph about why the event was so low-key.

The official dismissed any notion of the special relationship, saying: "There's nothing special about Britain. You're just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn't expect special treatment." The apparent lack of attention to detail by the Obama administration is indicative of what many believe to be Mr Obama's determination to do too much too quickly.

Oh. My. God. And this is from the "smart diplomacy" crowd.....


We're doomed.

Labels: , , , ,

|

Friday, February 13, 2009

Obama Surrenders in the War on Terror?

There are two main exporters of terror in the world. One of them is a state. The theocracy that runs Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism and insurgency.

US policy, since 1979, has been to treat Iran as a hostile country because Iran conducted acts of war. Despite protestations of innocence, Iran continues to develop nuclear weapons and delivery systems. The only thing that has slowed Iran's progress in achieving nuclear weaponry has been sanctions against that that country.

The man who was recently elected President of the United States, the one who has claimed that he will talk with the enemies of the the US with no pre-conditions, was insulted and told that HE had to meet Iran's pre-conditions in order to meet with THEM. So much for diplomacy and making "nice."

The President has said that he will draw down the troops in Iraq regardless of conditions; close Camp Delta at GTMO; dropped the charges against a killer in the USS Cole bombing; waived sanctions against another terror supporter, Syria, a country that was secretly building a plutonium factory with North Korean help; and is pondering the removal of restrictions against Cuba. Is he now going to drop the sanctions against Iran? Is this what President Obama calls "diplomacy?" Going with a carrot only approach to influence Iran?

Liberals are offended that conservatives are calling for the failure of Obama's policies. Conservatives are offended that Obama has these policies AT ALL.

Labels: ,

|

Sunday, February 08, 2009

What would all of you liberals say if Bush had done this?

Obama to centralize more power in the Executive Office. NSC to take on domestic issues.

Hmm, let's see.....

Rahm Emmanuel to take over the Census.
Kind of un-Constitutional....(of course, that does not seem to matter to Obama....)

From Samizdata:

In Article I, Section 2 the US Constitution orders that "The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct."

The Congress, by law directed that:

"The Secretary [of Commerce] shall perform the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title, may issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out such functions and duties, and may delegate the performance of such functions and duties and the authority to issue such rules and regulations to such officers and employees of the Department of Commerce as he may designate."

As I read it, the Director of the Census must, by law, be within the Department of Commerce and under the direction of the (Senate approved) Secretary of Commerce who then reports to the president. Am I missing something?

Correction: From reading through Title 13, Chapter 1 it appears obvious to me that the POTUS has no role in the census whatsoever beyond, with Senate approval, selecting the Secretary of Commerce and, also with Senate approval, selecting the Director of the Census who " shall perform such duties as may be imposed upon him by law, regulations, or orders of the Secretary." Hhmmm... No president mentioned.

The Secretary of Commerce is the only authority the law recognizes. Since as commenter Laird points out, the Constitution did not place the census function in Article II - the Executive branchArticle I - the Legislative branch, it is not at all within the President's reach unless the legislature places it there.


Nationalization of major parts of the economy.

Appointment of not ONE, not TWO, but THREE tax cheats to high position.

Appointment of Attorney General with ties to terrorists....

Colossal spending to shore up the Democratic power structure against the advice of the CBO.
and everyone else: Well, two experts. Which is two more than Obama's team is using....:

Robert Barro
This is probably the worst bill that has been put forward since the 1930s. I don't know what to say. I mean it's wasting a tremendous amount of money. It has some simplistic theory that I don't think will work, so I don't think the expenditure stuff is going to have the intended effect. I don't think it will expand the economy. And the tax cutting isn't really geared toward incentives. It's not really geared to lowering tax rates; it's more along the lines of throwing money at people. On both sides I think it's garbage. So in terms of balance between the two it doesn't really matter that much.

and

Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital.
Schiff scoffs at the notion the economic decline is starting to level off and concedes no government action means a "terrible" recession. But the path of increased government intervention will lead to "unmitigated disaster," says Schiff, who gained notoriety in 2007-08 for his prescient calls on the housing bubble and U.S. stocks.

Labels: , , , ,

|