Before You Start Believing the Left Wing Media

You should do your own research and find out who this wacko really was: a flag burning, Marx reading, flaming anti-semite, NOT a member of any group associated with or connected to the TEA Party or 9-12.

As Arizona Shooting Story Unfolds, Media Already Blaming Tea Party/Sarah Palin

Andrew Sullivan of the Atlantic.com was early to attempt to link lunatic killer Jared Loughner to the Tea Party, but he wasn’t the only one. The Washington Post’s Sandhya Somashekhar immediately attempted to color the story as an example of the “militant rhetoric” of the Tea Party movement and Sarah Palin.

Liberals on Saturday blamed the tea party movement’s sometimes militant rhetoric — for example, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin’s advice to her supporters via Twitter, “Don’t Retreat, Instead – RELOAD,” or Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle (R) advocating “second-amendment remedies” for some of the nation’s problems. Palin had also posted a U.S. map depicting crosshairs over the states where she hoped to oust Democratic incumbents. That map no longer appears on the Web site of her political action committee.

Additionally, within minutes of the attack, hard left-winger Paul Krugman of the New York Times asserted that the reason Giffords was shot was because her seat was not turned over to Republicans. Despite that no political motive was at all known, Krugman immediately asserted that it was the fault of the Tea Party and Sarah Palin.
As to Andrew Sullivan, on his DailyDish blog for the Atlantic, Sullivan posted an unconfirmed and anonymous claim from “a reader” who claimed to have heard people in a store callously saying that they were glad that a Republican could be appointed to replace the wounded Giffords. This “reader” also claimed that one of them said, “Well, that’s to be expected when you’re so liberal.”

Sullivan’s disgusting attempt to smear conservatives went on even as it was emerging that the killer’s ideology seems incoherent and not legitimately anchored in the left or the right.

Sullivan’s next idiotic attempt to smear the right was to conjure a connection between a campaign photo for Jesse Kelly — who is a Marine and was Gifford’s opponent recently — to using “violence” to further his political career because his campaign photo showed Kelly as a Marine holding his M16.

How many political candidates hold an automatic rifle in their open crotch in order to demonstrate their ideological bone fides? The conflation of conservatism with the willingness to use violence depressingly deepens.

Then, when this hack finally noticed that the killer’s book list included the Communist Manifesto and Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Sullivan tried to back track a bit saying that Loughner was, “Not exactly a Tea Party purist.”

Not exactly a Tea Party purist? Not a Tea Partier at all, more like.

The propensity of the leftists in the media, and in the government, to immediately blame all violence on the TEA Party, Palin supporters, and Glenn Beck is breathtaking. The speed with which they relaease all manner of false information within hours of the event is the most egregious violation of the public trust and shows a complete lack of any principles and makes me wonder if this was more than just a lone nut wacko.

Infil-traitor

The Tea Party and the 9-12 organizations need to vet their potential candidates a little better.

H/T Bubba at What Bubba Knows

Kokesh for Congress? No thanks, we already have enough immoral narcissists in D.C.

After spending most of the last decade in the company of communists and anti-American groups like CodePink, ANSWER, Moveon.org, SDS and IVAW, Adam Kokesh is now a conservative republican running for congress.

Donkey Doodle!

Adam thinks we are stupid, or more specifically, he thinks New Mexico conservatives are stupid enough to believe that he has changed colors. Does he expect forgiveness for his association with commies, America-Bashers and Troop Haters? If so, he's forgotten to actually ask for it.

» Say NO!! to IVAW's Adam Kokesh, "Republican"?!!!! for Congress?

Note that Kokesh has the endorsement of Ron and Rand Paul? Does that means he's abandoned his old anti-war commie buds to hang with 9/11 truthers and Jew Haters. No way!
Why would he? Truthers and anti-semites mix rather well with communists.

» DPNM: “Who is Adam Kokesh to lecture anyone on corruption?”

» Mullins: "Kokesh’s actions “dishonor the military”

Kokesh has a national base of Tea Party advocates, but Mullins describes himself as an organizer in the Farmington Tea Party movement.

Wrong. Kokesh has a national base of Tea Party Infiltrators and usurpers.
Established on February 10, 2010 : American Patriots Against Kokesh

Oh no! A President with ties to BIG OIL!

Via, BlueCrabBoulevard:
To all of the moonbats that continue to rant about the Bush ties to big oil...here's YOUR buddy. Remember the START of high oil prices...the 70's.....

Who would'a thunk that Carter was in tight with Big Oil? And you can't be bigger oil than this: Saudi Arabia. Oh, but I thought it was the Carlysle group that was secretly running the world through ties with Saudi Arabia. And he's not being "outed" by a conservative. That is, unless Alan Dershowitz has come to his senses.

"Recent disclosures of Carter's extensive financial connections to Arab oil money, particularly from Saudi Arabia, had deeply shaken my belief in his integrity. When I was first told that he received a monetary reward in the name of Shiekh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahayan, and kept the money, even after Harvard returned money from the same source because of its anti-Semitic history, I simply did not believe it. How could a man of such apparent integrity enrich himself with dirty money from so dirty a source?
...The Zayed Centre for Coordination and Follow-up, a think-tank funded by the Shiekh and run by his son, hosted speakers who called Jews "the enemies of all nations," attributed the assassination of John Kennedy to Israel and the Mossad and the 9/11 attacks to the United States' own military, and stated that the Holocaust was a "fable." (They also hosted a speech by Jimmy Carter.) To its credit, Harvard turned the money back. To his discredit, Carter did not. "

And it gets worse.
As BlueCrab says: No wonder Michel Moore and Jimmuh were so buddy buddy.

In the past, I thought that Jimmy Carter was just a weak President. Now I see how corrupt he has been and continues to be. He has never met a dictator that he dislikes. And the current Democratic party has returned to using him as a spokesman. He should be shunned. Unless of course the Democrats don't mind being associated with a corrupt, anti-semitic bigot.