The Cold Hard Facts

Emails! Junk Science! Global Warming! Deniers! Warmists! Global Cooling! The Sky is Falling!


We have all been told that Antarctica is warming at a tremendous rate. Well, one source of the "AGW" scam is the GHCN, the Global Historical Climate Network. And they measured the temperatures in the Antarctic for the last seventeen years at this place, Rothera Station.

THIS ONE PLACE.

FOR THE ENTIRE CONTINENT.

AND ITS NOT EVEN IN THE ANTARCTIC POLAR CLIMATE ZONE.

Its amazing what happens to that "warming trend" when you take location of the sensor and factor in other measurements.....

In case it has escaped those of you that still believe in AGW, this is how big Antarctica truly is:


Would you trust the scientists that based the average temperature of the United States measured by one thermometer in Miami, Florida? Let's add these to the 100 Reasons why AGW is false.

Update!: (Yes, I am that quick)

In case one of you poor, poor deluded fools that still believe that AGW is "settled science" here is what happens when data from MORE Antarctica measurements are reconstructed....

And here is yet a completely different take on the subject of Antarctic warming in the western half: Volcanoes.


Quote of the Decade:

There is a reason why geologists are not included in the IPCC process – we can explain observations using known scientific facts without inventing scientific novelties. The IPCC, by ignoring the geology of the Earth, can then invent novel explanations for the same observations, the existing one being human emission of some CO2.

Original data that started "Global Waming theory" missing, falsified, or unavailable for review.

Global warming is settled science. Everything about it is proven. Just ask them.

Heh. Its not even science......

Imagine you are a climate researcher who has been assembling the data that is used to support claims of global warming. Or imagine you are Phil Jones from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia. Or imagine you are a scientific fraud. Did I write “or”? I meant “and.”

Over at RedState, "BeagleScout" Miller begins his post with the above statement. Its also a summary of the entire thing. Quite a feat summarizing the entire post in your opening paragraph.

Apparently, scientific theories are supposed to be "repeatable" or, at least, "reviewed" by other scientists, using the ORIGINAL data.....who knew?

Over at Watts Up With That, Patrick J. Michaels, of National Review Online, exposes the fraud inherent in the entire global warming theory, in the article, The Dog Ate Global Warming.

The original "scientists" admit to throwing away the ORIGINAL data. And kept only their doctored data. Except when they have it, but refuse to provide it for review.....
Of course the sources for that data have huge problems, also.....

...the weather data that go into the historical climate records that are required to verify models of global warming aren’t the original records at all. Jones and Wigley, however, weren’t specific about what was done to which station in order to produce their record, which, according to the IPCC, showed a warming of 0.6° +/– 0.2°C in the 20th century.

Now begins the fun. Warwick Hughes, an Australian scientist, wondered where that “+/–” came from, so he politely wrote Phil Jones in early 2005, asking for the original data. Jones’s response to a fellow scientist attempting to replicate his work was, “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”

Reread that statement, for it is breathtaking in its anti-scientific thrust. In fact, the entire purpose of replication is to “try and find something wrong.”

Make sure that you read the comment section of the above post. Very, very enlightening about the actual status of climatology....

Global Warming - Explained?

Greenhouse gases are going to kill us all! Or not. Maybe. The science is settled.

This is a primer on The Greenhouse Effect. The author shows how the subject is settled, once and for all....

Except for the 280+ comments that can show otherwise....

Go get your brain tired. Very scientific discussion in the comments about this very interesting topic. Be prepared to learn some science.

And if you haven't exhausted your brain cells after that, Cold Facts on Global Warming, will fill in the science that the press and the advocates leave out of the newspaper. Notice that this was published in 2003. But, of course, there's no money in a "no greenhouse catastrophe" scenario...