DICK Durbin Not Sure If Bloggers Deserve Constitutional Protection
DICK Durbin Not Sure If Bloggers Deserve Constitutional Protection
DICK "guards at Gitmo same as Gestapo" Durbin the Turban, doesn't know if bloggers and people using Twitter have the right of free speech? The 1st Amendment is very specific on this issue DICK: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Perhaps DICK should enroll in some remedial reading classes or maybe a basic course in understanding the English language would be in order.
IIRC the old Soviet Union, the USSR, made it illegal to speak out against the ruling class. We all know where that wound up. You think it can't happen here?
It already is.
On the May 26 broadcast of the Sunday show, Durbin told host Chris Wallace that he wasn't sure if bloggers or "someone who is Tweeting" should be given protections under a media shield law.
DICK "guards at Gitmo same as Gestapo" Durbin the Turban, doesn't know if bloggers and people using Twitter have the right of free speech? The 1st Amendment is very specific on this issue DICK: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Perhaps DICK should enroll in some remedial reading classes or maybe a basic course in understanding the English language would be in order.
IIRC the old Soviet Union, the USSR, made it illegal to speak out against the ruling class. We all know where that wound up. You think it can't happen here?
It already is.
Labels: 1st Amendment, bloggers, Breitbart, Durbin the Turban, foxnews, twitter
posted by concretebob at 6:07 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home