Dick Morris Agrees: No Hillary As VP

Here is another angle (Hat tip: Newsmax), different than the one that I took, on why Obama will (should not) have Hillary as his VP. This, courtesy of former “Klin-toon” insider Dick Morris:

“Hillary would add no votes to Obama; she would dog his campaign with scandal; she would be disloyal in office; and her husband would be, at best, a huge distraction. Case closed.”

My favorite quote:

“Voters only credit Hillary with having experience when her record is compared with Obama’s almost total lack of a record.”

Ouch!

While we are on the subject of Hillary’s experience at running the country, let me re-iterate something I have previously said. Hillary has never been president before, yet she touts her foreign policy experience, the bamboozled universal healthcare attempt, and other assorted “favorites” as signs of her experience in office. Hillary, as First Lady, should never have been involved in any foreign policy to begin with. She had no credentials, nor experience to do these things, and was neither hired as a consultant/employee (nor should she have been because of her marital connection to a sitting president), NEITHER WAS SHE ELECTED TO BE involved in such matters. Every time she touts her experience in these areas, she confesses just how involved she was (both in full view, and behind the scenes) in matters she never should have been let anywhere near.

What un-elected “official” would take up the mantle of foreign policy or universal socialist healthcare in a Hillary Clinton presidency this time? Chelsea maybe?